You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Locate and read the following cases. Briefly identify each by full name, including citation describe its judicial history and gi
Journalism & Communication
Pages 3 (753 words)
Student Name: Tutor’s Name: Subject: Date of Submission: Case Review The case, Edmund Goppelt, the Appellee vs. City of Philadelphia Revenue Department, the Appellant, was argued from 24th June 2003 and decided on 9th January 2004. The appellant, City of Philadelphia, appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County requiring the appellant to grant the Appellee, Goppelt, to have access to the register of felonious real estate tax payers.
Additionally, the appellant appealed that the court had blundered by noting that that the off-site mailing addresses are “public records”. In its previous history, Goppelt, the Appellee had channeled a request to Appellant under the “Right to Know Act” Act of June 21, 1957, P.L. 390, as revised, 65 P.S. §?66.1-66.9. The Appellee had petitioned for data linked to unsettled real estate felonies. As the Act requires, the appellant failed to reply the appellee’s written request. The appellee then went to the court after the appellant failed to respond and alleged that the appellant’s failure to respond to their request was observed as a denial under the Act (Friedman et al 1). The appellee served the appellant with a letter that required the appellant to provide the appellee with the required information. However, the appellant noted that the letter had not specified the information to be provided. When provided with the files, the appellee noted that some parts of the files were missing and that some of the mailing addresses were not accurate and differed from those of “off-site mailing addresses” for real estate tax bills. ...
Not exactly what you need?