One recent instance of conflict and negotiation in the political world is the partial shutdown of the US government. The conflict originated from lack of consensus on political issues but wrecked not only the political but also the social and economic fabric of the US. The primary parties to this conflict were President Obama with the Democrats on one side and the Republican House of Representatives on the other side. The issue arose on October 1, 2013 during a budget discussion session in the Congress due to a disagreement over a particular healthcare reform law. The Republicans were not in favor of passing the reformed healthcare law and looked forward to a delay or repeal in the legislation. But President Obama strictly asserted that he wanted the bill to be passed clean and without any amendments or unnecessary delays. The resulting concord between the parties led the Republicans to declare a partial shutdown of the government operations in the US. This primary issue of the healthcare reform bill further got entangled with another vital issue regarding the debt ceiling for government borrowings. Obama requested a relaxation of the debt ceiling as the deadline for the same was approaching soon, i.e. on October 17, 2013. Not extending the debt limit would lead to a fiscal impasse as the nation will be unable to repay its debts and clear its bills. This would affect not only the US economy but also the global economy and the secondary parties such as the financial agencies, stock markets, federal workers and general public. The 16-day-long impasse in the US was primarily born out of a policy deadlock over the spending bill in the government budget. President Obama had suggested the inclusion of a healthcare reform law, Affordable Care Act, which offers a range of healthcare and welfare facilities for the US citizens. But the Republican-led House of Representatives refused to pass it and showed intentions to repeal or delay it by the span of a year. They called for a House-Senate Conference Committee to resolve the matter. But the Democrats refused to this idea, saying that the House was just trying to defer the new healthcare law using the pretext of the budget process. Owing to this unresolved conflict, the House declared a partial shutdown of the government on October 1. While the Republicans insisted on a delay in the implementation of the healthcare reform, Obama remained immovable on his stance that “Obamacare” is non-negotiable and that he wanted a “clean bill” devoid of any conditions or amendments. (CNBC, 2013) This shutdown very soon raised an alarm amongst the secondary parties to the conflict. Wall Street officials expressed their concern over the present shutdown and the future prospect of a financial default. The US government was fast approaching its debt ceiling of $ 16.7 trillion which it was about to hit on October 17 (Jackson, 2013). James Clapper, Director of the US National Intelligence, shared with the media his grave fears regarding the severe impact of the shutdown on their ability “to support the military, to support diplomacy, and to support the policymakers.” (Cornwell, 2013). Owing to the shutdown, 70% of the federal intelligence personnel had been sent on unpaid leave. Lloyd Blankfein, Chairman and CEO of the Goldman Sachs Group, apprehended over the aligned and perhaps more critical issue of a financial default arising from the shutdown. Saying that America had seen a precedent
Negotiation & Conflict Resolution: The Shutdown in the USA appended between Obama and the Congress Change is most constant ingredient of life, in fact the essence of life. And change gives birth to conflict; conflict between those who advocate change and those who oppose it…
Litigation involves a lawsuit. The downside of litigation is that it will take a long time to reach a solution. However, as Ge (1996) points out, the benefit of this alternative is that it offers a chance to present extensive document evidences and elaborate arbitrations; and the decision reached in this way will be fully legal and the option of appeal is still open.
This identifies the significance of conflict resolution. In this paper, I review a work related situation that involved a conflict, explore the scope of the conflict, its resolution approach, and an alternative resolution approach. Overview of the situation Organizations realize conflicts in different forms and at different levels.
In this situation, my landlord and I were primary parties and there were no secondary parties. Our common friend, co-incidentally a lawyer, served as a constituent party. The relationship between the two primary parties was that of landlord and tenant. There had been no negative interactions or conflict of interests between us in the past.
From the Boulder city hospital it is evident that the conflict between workers and the hospital was resolved in court, however it was possible to resolve the problem through negotiations. There are a number of techniques involved in the case and they are as follows:
The theory is that teachers are relying on their tenureship and seniority, such that securing these, their employment is assured no matter the quality of performance. The rationale of the reforms is that teachers who perform well should be commensurately compensated, much
Further, the era of globalization had started to gain prominence with the opening up of former closed economies such as China and India (David Shambaugh, 2008). The opening up of these new liberal markets further spearheaded the need to understand and evolve a concerted
My second action following the individual interviews is to meet with the rest of the employees of the department as a group without the presence of the three employees involved in the conflict. The idea behind interviewing the
A person offering additional payment for a piece of land in asking for possession of the land can be taken as an example of offering incentives. This move is appropriate when related parties have financial or social concerns to a deal and they show
Conflict is an unhealthy practice capable of undermining and compromising the nursing profession. It may involve a state of power struggle at the workplace. Efficiently managed conflict by the nurses leads to personal and organizational growth; this forms a positive
7 pages (1750 words)Essay
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org