Media Law and Ethics [Supervisor’s name] Media Law and Ethics Media plays an electable role at every part of the world and it is found in varied form in different countries. The Great Britain history of media laws have been reformed as the country move towards the formation of liberal domestic government…
In today’s modern world where there is the rule of information, Media holds a huge responsibility in the aspect of State politics, culture and economics. The role of media cannot be separated from masses living out in a multi-cultural system. In UK, where media holds a distinctive position, have a close relationship with customs of the State. Media which exercise the right of freedom of speech, uncovers all the special events taking place in the general public, in the parliament or in the secretariat office (Kieran, 1998). It automatically becomes the responsibility of journalism and journalists to deliver the right message and right information to the public, in order to avoid any misinterpretation or create big misunderstandings. The role of media in UK has always remained under criticism, as there had been events in the past which portrayed the negative image of journalism and journalist’s rule in the region. There had been stories which brought curiosity into the public (Kieran, 1998). Princess Diana before her death had been a continuous target for media intrusion in her life to which she confronted to the British press that she wanted privacy in her private life of her sons and herself. The press was anxious to take pictures of Princess Diana with Dodi Fayed who was the son of Mohammad Fayed, a wealthy owner of Harrods. Princess of Wales had claimed before that she had been harassed by freelance photographers who would sell photographs to media and then they would leak their picture which was clear intrusion in her private life. Even after the divorce from Prince of Wales, Princess Diana did that entire she could do to appeal from journalist to leave her and her children alone to get along with their lives. Princess Diana was so irritated with journalists’ intrusion that she jumped out of the car and took the ignition key from the journalist bike from preventing them from following. Even in the night when Princess Diana died, the reason for her death was the chasing of the media journalist of her car. The presence of Paparazzi in the place of the incident and tried to take photographs of Princes Diana raised concerns over privacy laws and freedom for press in Great Britain (Crook, 2010). The case of Milly Dowler, a thirteen year old girl, who got kidnapped and murdered, is one of the main incidents which can never be forgotten. The story raises a lot of questions that never had been answered by the journalism’s community in the true essence (Peck, 2010). An investigation made by the Surrey police in 2002, reported strict involvements of journalists in the murder of the 13 year old girl, Milly Dowler. After Dowler’s disappearance, her phone got hacked, and nobody knew where the girl was and she was not even answering the phone (Leigh, 2012). News of the World Journalists became part of the story, when Surrey Police identified them as distracters of the ongoing investigation. There were many journalists who were found guilty on the hacking of Dowler’s phone and the deletion of instant voicemail messages (Get Surrey, 2012). It brought a serious questioning on the face of media of that time and still today has been set as a weird example for the rest of the journalism community (Leigh, 2012). The deliverance of ...
Cite this document
(“Media law and ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/journalism-communication/11589-media-law-and-ethics
(Media Law and Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 Words)
“Media Law and Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/journalism-communication/11589-media-law-and-ethics.
This inevitably means that the media as the public’s source of information is at liberty to attend and report on public trials.1 However, in practice there are often conflicts between the underlying principles of the right to a fair hearing and the underlying principles of the media’s right to freedom of information.2 The fact is, there are practical difficulties in remaining true to both human rights at the same time.3 For instance, can the right to a fair trial be sustained when the jurors or any tribunal of fact receives information from both the court and the media?
This becomes problematic in areas where objectivity is of utmost necessity such as in court proceedings that determine the guilt of an accused. In the UK jurisdiction, this problem is solved through the passing of the Contempt of Court Act 1987 where individuals or entities are proscribed from publishing materials that tend to influence the jury and the courts during the pendency of proceedings.
Abu Ghraib Photos: Issues in Media Ethics Abstract This paper is a conference-length case study examining a recent or historical issue of media ethics. The particular historical issue of media ethics that it will discuss is a case study Abu Ghraib Photos.
The events in the local community, nation and world are achievable from newspaper and this is why it is a pivotal source of information. In olden times newspaper was the main form of information about events to people. It gives information about all segments of community like social, political economical and entertainment.
In essence, media press has been at the core of these controversies and debates given that it is the major means of communicating to the public. Generally, press freedom refers to the liberty and free choice granted to various communication outlets such as electronic and print media to communicate and express events, news, information, criticism and opinions (Barendt, 2009).
This can be said to be the main issue that the courts will deal with as they try to determine whether Mr. White’s actions fall under free speech and the boundaries that have been set for it. Once in trial, the defense will no doubt attempt to argue that the accused was just practicing his right of freedom of expression and simply offering his opinion on a subject to those who would listen to him thus he has done no wrong (Rosen).
Amendment IV of the United States Constitution provides for defense against awkward search or arrest, in addition to calling for a judicially issued warrant that is also sustained by probable cause. This part of the bill of rights that regulates on invasion of privacy is, however, only applicable to searches or arrests conducted by the government but not those done by private organizations or individuals.
Will Espinoza be successful in her defense? Why or why not? 2. Analyze YouTube’s argument that it has complied with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Remember to provide any legal precedent or other evidence that YouTube can use in its defense. Will YouTube be successful in its defense?
People use reason as a main tool to choose a course of action in a scale of options for a single virtue. It is through this that people decide their satisfaction and pleasure. The individual is the center of this ethics model.
Kant's stand on ethics is that reason directs the actions of a person (Patterson and Wilkins, 9).
tion is at liberty to attend and report on public trials.1 However, in practice there are often conflicts between the underlying principles of the right to a fair hearing and the underlying principles of the media’s right to freedom of information.2 The fact is, there are
20 Pages(5000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Media law and ethics for FREE!