Copyright and Creativity Introduction Under the US law, copyright protects the expression of an idea, but not the idea itself, that can be established in a tangible medium. Thus, this protection includes the rights to use, copy, distribute and perform, in the case of the performing arts, certain works and is exclusively granted to the copyright holder of the work alone…
It is purported that copyright primarily serves the end of encouraging creativity, because of the inspiration it provides to authors/writers/creators and would-be authors/writers/creators that will see creativity as an opportunity to gain economic advantage as well as an acknowledgment of their talent. This claim, however, is being contested by those who argue that artists have been churning out great works of arts for centuries without the benefit of copyright protection. Worse, there are those who perceive copyright protection as an unwitting tool for stifling creativity as illustrated by recent cases where works have been prohibited from seeing publication on the ground that they infringe the copyright law. The question that is being contemplated by this paper, therefore, is whether or not copyright protection encourages or stifles artistic creativity. Background The US Copyright Law has its roots in the 1710, Statute of Anne, an English law that ended the monopoly of the Stationer’s Company by vesting exclusive right of books to their authors for fourteen years, subject to renewal. After the American Revolution in the 18th century, several states their own copyright laws that took after the Statute of Anne, but the Constitutional Convention decided that a unifying law on copyright should be enacted nationally and thus, attached a clause mandating such passage in Article 1 of the proposed Constitution. The subsequent Copyright Act of 1970 copied the 14-year period of exclusive right to authors renewable for another 14 years and was made applicable solely to books, maps and maritime charts. Eventually, however, the US copyright law was broadened to cover other original works as well. In the Copyright Act of 1909, the coverage of the grant extended to all written works not only in the US but to various written foreign works as well. In addition, it extended the period of the exclusive right to 28 years, which is renewable for another 28 years. The next copyright law, i.e. Copyright Act of 1976 is the precursor of the present US copyright law. This Act eliminated many of the earlier features as well as added new ones. For example, it established a single period of exclusive right for all kinds of works, which is the life of the author plus 50 years, dismissed the formalities and made the right applicable the very moment the work becomes a concrete medium of expression. 1 Before the present consolidated US copyright law came into being, the Copyright Act 1976 went through various amendments and supplementations. These include the following: the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992, which added copyright grant to digital audio recordings; the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998, which extended the exclusive right to 20 years, and; the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, which deals with high-technology works. 2 Features of the Present US Copyright Law Under the present US Copyright Law, which is denominated as Title 17 of the United States Code, the exclusive rights to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies, perform, display publicly and use in a digital audio transmission of works, are granted only to their authors or creators.3 The copyright grant covers only 8 kinds of words, and their respective derivatives, namely: literary ...
Cite this document
(“Copyright and Creativity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/journalism-communication/49692-do-you-think-that-copyright-encourages-or-stifles
(Copyright and Creativity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 Words)
“Copyright and Creativity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/journalism-communication/49692-do-you-think-that-copyright-encourages-or-stifles.
Today, most people see copyright laws as a form of restricting what individuals can do with other’s creative work. It is understandable that copying the work of another creative expert and terming it as own is illegal. Bodies that regulate the usage and protection of an artist’s work use copyright laws to ensure safety of these artist’s work.
It has rather evolved from one meaning into another. Earlier in the Greek period it was related to copying of a specific work and incorporating it in a different manner to create another (Pedley, 2005). Recently, the term has been considered solely as “taking inspiration” from other works by means of adding the selective portions of other’s copyrighted work to form a different work (Craig, 2011).
.Thus , intellectual property will in general parlance include copyrights , trademarks , patents ,plans ,logos, trade secrets ,ideas and other guises of artistic or creative expression despite the particular laws administering each such form may be distinct and separate.
The reason is that the criteria set by legislators for the protection and the recognition of rights are often not clear, being open to different interpretations depending on the conditions of each case. In current paper emphasis is given on the criteria set for awarding a specific type of rights: the copyrights rights.
More often than not, the two coincide, not only because employee legal infringements adversely impact upon a company's public image but because the violation of laws from within the organization, even if they are the independent action of single employees, places companies in questionable legal positions.
In the conclusion part the internet safety issues especially with respect to children and parents are also discussed.
Copy right protection is given for original works and it is not associated with a common idea, process, practice, methods and innovations.
One main contention is that the use of a sampling of previously composed music be permissible in the creation of new music. However, present copyright laws make this illegal. In the mid- to late 1980s, hip-hop artists had a very small window of opportunity to run wild with the newly emerging sampling technologies before the record labels and lawyers started paying attention.
In this fast digital age where Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V are used extensively, the copyright laws of all the photographers are ignored who are attached to their photographs emotionally or consider them as potential source of income. This is mainly because internet these days is considered as "free", which to its users means that everything published on the internet is free for downloading, using and sharing.
of internet, copyright was much common, and in many of the cases the offender violated the notion of copyright without any feel of accountability, rather the offender use to term his action as contribution or propagation of resources and knowledge. It was never too late, never