Please boost your Plan to download papers
Book Report/Review example - Sociology of Mass Communication: Theses on Media Deregulation
Journalism & Communication
Pages 3 (753 words)
McChesney’s “Theses on Media Deregulation” generally poses an important argument on the ideal role and objectives of both the media and the government. The author’s concern for the public’s right is obvious; yet, it is indeed evident that McChesney’s perspective on the issue appears to be on the more ideal side of the spectrum and rather living in the traditional part of the history…
Extract of sample
Sociology of Mass Communication: Theses on Media Deregulation
According to McChesney, any form of market regulation is highly-dependent on government laws and policies. He also mentioned furthermore that public policy is established first before the construction of media system and this is what he calls regulation. On the other hand, he argues that the deregulation is an unacknowledged regulation done by the government on behalf of powerful self-interested private parties. This, according to him, lessens the democratic public’s involvement in policy making. This argument further leads into his certain bias on the ideal ways of how things work. It implies the author’s belief in maintaining the government’s main purpose, that is, to serve the majority of the public and not the private sector. More so, “the problem lies less with evil owners than with the failure of democratic policy-making”. Everything, in his belief, should be for the sake of the people and this present a very subjective view considering the fact that the economic factor plays an important role in the development of a country not only in the national aspects but also in the global competition.
Another argument that signifies McChesney’s ideal belief is that, “the media system is not simply an economic category; it is responsible for transmitting culture, journalism and politically relevant information… even as economic entities, most media are public goods.” (McChesney). ...
Not exactly what