Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341; Rita Miller V. Clinton County, 544 F.3d 542 - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Masters
Author : hesselericka
Essay
Journalism & Communication
Pages 4 (1004 words)

Summary

Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA), Defendant, Appellant, was argued from June 15 1998 and decided on December 10 1998. The defendant, SORTA, which is a state…

Extract of sample
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341; Rita Miller V. Clinton County, 544 F.3d 542

enged SORTA’s decision to reject the planned wrap-around advertisement, which they (SORTA) termed as aesthetically unpleasant and too controversial. Among SORTA’s commercial ventures is the sale of advertising space on the buses and bus shelters it owns. However, UFCWU’s proposed wrap-up advertisement, which portrayed protesting union workers fleeing from the police and boarding a bus belonging to SORTA was rejected. In its ruling, the district court concluded that UFCWU was favored by the balance of equities and, therefore, granted the preliminary injunctive relief (Moore 1).
Case number 07-2105, Rita Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Clinton County; Honorable Richard Saxton, Appellant, was argued from May 13 2008 and decided on October 1 2008. The civil rights action was brought against Richard Saxton, the Court of Common Pleas’ President Judge, by Clinton County’s former probation officer, Rita Miller. It was asserted by Rita Miller that Richard Saxton violated her right to free speech (First Amendment) and right to due process (Fourteenth Amendment) by firing her after she wrote him a complaint letter claiming hostility and intimidation from her supervisor. Miller appealed against Saxton’s decision to fire her, and a district court permitted the wrongful termination case to proceed. However, the case was dismissed by a federal appeals court, effectively reversing the ruling made by the district judge. Miller had alleged that her supervisor had acted unprofessionally by stating the probationers were a scum and did not merit the money spent on them by the probation office. In his move to dismiss the claims, Saxton wanted to be granted a summary judgment motion and alleged to be immune to suit.
In the UFCWU v. SORTA appeal case, the court stated that a preliminary injunction aims to avert irreparable injury and uphold a court’s capacity to deliver significant decisions based on merit in reference to Canal Authority of State of Florida v. Callaway, 489 F.2d ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Online V/S Traditional Education
These enhancements to education are clear benefits to their recipients, and the adoption of technology in the classroom (or even complete replacement of the classroom) poses questions for the future. The internet has revolutionized the educational system with online classes becoming popular among students. With options of time management, personal attention and activities, students are more inclined to experience the college atmosphere. Technology results in changing perspectives of the functions of education at a very fundamental level. On one level, it empowers students to take charge of…
4 pages (1004 words)
J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District and US v. Michael Anthony Marcavage, Appellant
Michael Anthony Marcavage. The case was first filed in 2007 then the final decision took place in June 2010 in The Third Circuit. Michael Anthony filed an appeal against the Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia. In the first case two students from Blue Mountain School District were suspended. They had created a fake profile of their principal on MySpace. The eighth standard students did not mention the principal, James McGonigle’s name on the profile but they included his picture which they took from the website of the school district. They also identified this profile of a…
3 pages (753 words)
H - L, P: Scheetz v. The Morning Call, 946 F.2d 202 Walker v. Pearl S. Buck Foundation, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17927
From the case’s details, the email aimed at communicating to the fans who had bought the tickets of an upcoming match that it had been cancelled. However, the email was met with a fury, which was, asserted in the countersuit, as having been directed to the perceived sender of the email, Joseph Krause. The defendant did not send the email and had nothing to do with informing the fans that a match had been cancelled, and had not authorized or allowed the AFC Philadelphia to use his email address (Baylson 1). The Plaintiff had sued the defendant for trademark violation, copyright violation,…
3 pages (753 words)
National Football League v. Primetime 24, 211 F.3d 10 WNET, Thirteen v. Aereo, Inc., 712 F.3d 676
In the case’s previous history, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 636(c), National Football League took a legal action against Primetime 24 for copyright violation and sought for an injunctive relief and statutory damages. National Football League accused Primetime 24 of going beyond their statutory license offered for certain U.S. retransmissions by the Satellite Home Viewer Act by transmitting patented NFL football game telecasts to Canada (Van Graafeiland et al 1). The Plaintiff had argued that though the Satellite Home Viewer Act approved the transmission of the program to only “unserved…
3 pages (753 words)
Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v FCC, 518 U.S. 727 United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S.
In this Act, section 10 (a) and (c) allowed television program operator to forbid or deny broadcasting a program that it practically trusts portrays sexual activities or organs in a patently offensive way. On the other hand, section 10 (b) required the operators to distinguish a “patently belligerent” programming, block it and unblock it within 30 days of the viewer’s request (Breyer et al. 1). The appeal’s court held that the three sections were coherent with the First Amendment. The ruling was acknowledged in part and reversed in part. The court issued the opinion resolving that §…
3 pages (753 words)
The Inaugural Address of John F. Kennedy
This paper analyzes the speech of President Kennedy’s activity using words, which exemplified his main goals of uniting the two opposite forces. Through the speech, he communicated his determination and his preparedness in striving for peace, and more importantly, includes everyone in the role of pursuing the goal. His metaphorical diction demonstrated the appealing nature of his leadership among the audience, where he encapsulates poverty and the liberation of Americans in well thought-out metaphors. Through his diction, he evokes a sense of justice, emphasizes the importance of national…
4 pages (1004 words)