First Amendment Essay example
Undergraduate
Essay
Journalism & Communication
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
The First Amendment Protects Free Speech Name Instructor Class Date The First Amendment does protect free speech. More precisely, it protects a person’s legal right to express their opinions freely without fear of government intervention. The Constitutional right extends solely to government attempts of suppressing speech not corporations, organizations or individuals…

Introduction

Speech, as defined by the Constitution is not limited to the spoken word. It can be an expression or idea. Symbolic speech, as it is often referred to, includes various types of nonverbal communications such as peaceful protests, campaign signs in the front yard and burning the American flag. Yes, burning the flag is a legal expression of free speech. The Supreme Court, through years of rulings, has clearly defined the parameters of free speech. For example in 1969 Brandenburg v. Ohio case the Court ruled that government could not forbid speech that encourages subversive or illegal activity unless that “advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969) Using Brandenburg as precedent the Supreme Court ruled the government could not prosecute a Vietnam draft dodger who said “if they ever make me carry a rifle, the first man I want in my sights is L.B.J.” in Watts v. U.S. (1969). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Book Review
Allen& Jensen (1995) Pg 5-8, claim that freedom of speech is not supreme in any country and is subject to restrictions such as slander, libel, incitement or obscenity. In this regard, this paper aims to review a book that deals with the First Amendment and some aspects of freedom of expression, the overarching themes and key points made in the chapter, as well response grounded on what I have…
An Analysis of the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission Ruling in the Context of Equal Right
By way of brief background, the case takes root in 2008 when a non-profit corporation, Citizens United, released a documentary entitled “Hillary” that was made to target the former Senator who was at the time vying for the nomination of the Democrats. The Supreme Court ruled that electioneering communications fell under the protective ambit of the First Amendment. It therefore overruled the…
CSU Sacramento Essay
In that regard, this paper aims at explaining an ongoing controversy regarding the freedom of expression and the First Amendment in terms of news media on music and censorship and internet censorship, the argument being whether censorship is essential in maintaining moral standards. It will also identify government and repressive laws and abuses of freedom of expression. Additionally, it will also…
Campaign financing is protected under the First Amendment and is a form of free speech
The sources include bodies like companies in the possession of the state or those that are independently held. The event of funding campaigns comprises of variant views from scholars. There are people who support the actions whereas others refute this idea. Funding campaigns is an exceedingly freewill to corporations and entities (Hudson, 2011). This has explanations in the idea that corporations…
First Amendment Hypothetical (LAW & ETHICS OF DIGITAL MEDIA)
On the other hand, the prosecution will attempt to prove that the actions of Mr. White went past his rights in the first amendment due to the nature of the information that he dealt with and therefore he should be punished in accordance to the law. The other legal issue that may be faced in this trial has to do with the matter of jurisdiction. This is to say that whether the prosecution can prove…
United Food & Commercial Workers Union
United Food & Commercial Workers Union …
Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v FCC, 518 U.S. 727 United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S.
In this Act, section 10 (a) and (c) allowed television program operator to forbid or deny broadcasting a program that it practically trusts portrays sexual activities or organs in a patently offensive way. On the other hand, section 10 (b) required the operators to distinguish a “patently belligerent” programming, block it and unblock it within 30 days of the viewer’s request (Breyer et al.…