In effect of globalization, industrial nations have come across various alterations, specifications, developmental needs and sustainability concerns. Among these, the issue of cultural imperialism has gained immense significance in the worldwide arena …
As connoted by Sarmela, “Cultural imperialism is the economic, technological and cultural hegemony of the industrialized nations, which determines the direction of both economic and social progress, defines cultural values, and standardizes the civilization and cultural environment throughout the world” (Sarmela 13).
Hence, considering the instability and struggle of the various nations to understand and thereby react resourcefully towards the accreditations as well as criticisms made by foreign cultures, it can be affirmed that the aspect of cultural imperialism indeed plays a vital role. Contextually, it can also be regarded that forethought to the criticality of the concept (i.e. cultural imperialism), has been argued by various experts associated with different professional dimensions as a means to elaborate homogeny within humankind (Hawksley, “Conceptualising Imperialism in the 21st Century”). A philosophical explanation to the aspect also encourages the arguments on behalf of cultural imperialism, describing it as a fundamental aspect to energize human communication, harmony and socio-economic progress (Gilbert, “Cultural Imperialism Revisited: Counselling and Globalisation”).
However, rather than being well thought-out in every industrialized nation, the concept of cultural imperialism has been mostly related with the philosophies considered by the United States of America in relation to its socio-economic progressive initiatives. ...
itiative of ‘Americanization’, especially when relating to the socio-economic relationship between the US and the Middle Eastern Islamic countries. This particular concern can be critically analyzed with concern to the study conducted by Rauschenberger (1-35). According to Rauschenberger, many industrialized nations today have been inevitably influenced by the technological developments as well as the philosophical aspirations of America and other developed western countries, which are somewhat impulsively re-shaping the cultural rudiments of those developing nations. The examples include China, Saudi Arabia, France, Iran and Iraq among others. The rudiments of the alterations happening within the national contexts in effect of cultural imperialism, which is also referred as ‘Americanization’ can be identified with reference to the rapid progression of American retail chains, film industry as well as the channelization of societal paradigms in the international podium. It is worth mentioning in this regard that not all the nations have been convivial with such alterations, disregarding their ancient heritage and cultural rudiments for the sake of cultural imperialism (Rauschenberger, “It’s Only a Movie – Right? Deconstructing Cultural Imperialism Examining the Mechanisms Behind U.S. Domination of the Global Cultural Trade”). It is in this context that Islamic nations have often been disparaged in the international context as a major adversary of the US. Even a few of the terrorist attacks on America have been deliberated by the groups as fundamentally motivated by the “perceived American cultural imperialism” (Rauschenberger, “It’s Only a Movie – Right? Deconstructing Cultural Imperialism Examining the Mechanisms Behind U.S. Domination of the ...
Cite this document
(“Concept of Cultural Imperialism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/journalism-communication/81271-concept-of-cultural-imperialism
(Concept of Cultural Imperialism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Concept of Cultural Imperialism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/journalism-communication/81271-concept-of-cultural-imperialism.
It is becoming more common that people come across efforts by these corporations to infiltrate into their cultural experiences. The consumer is seemingly losing the fight for control as these transitional corporations are not only selling their products and technologies but are also trying to pervade capitalist values and to some extent venerate the Western or American lifestyles; the value system of many developing economies gets suppressed by global capitalism and/or Western value systems in this process.
While theories of modernization or development envisioned an ‘evolution’ from undeveloped to developed society, or from traditional to industrial, it is often argued by proponents of universality than non-Western cultures will slowly progress which will raise the status of the universalist principle of human rights (Bruun & Jacobsen, 2000).
Such illustrations share an obsession with new communications and information technologies, such as the Internet. As argued by intellectuals, such as David Harvey, modernity and postmodernity embody two distinct stages of capitalism. The transition from one phase to another has not been a transition from capitalism to a certain ‘post-capitalist’ period, and the underlying principle of capitalist accumulation remains alive.1 This essay analyses David Harvey’s theory of new imperialism.
For him, the real estate investors, the oil companies, and many companies were busy exploiting the rest of the society and there was need to protect the society against this. For many, the industrial revolution would eventually be strong enough to ensure that the benefits were actually well distributed in the society.
The author analyzes the dominant cultural discourse originating from the United States and other imperialist metropolises and spreading through the new media. He revises the cultural imperialism thesis without loosing its original vigour, from the standpoint of such earthshaking changes confronting the global media culture.
After the breakdown of the U.S.S.R, the fast emerging independent nations felt a need for unified solidarity. The experience of colonialism had unified masses of the colonized states, which was theoretically referred to as the Third World. The Bandung Conference of 1955 was held in the interest of the 'Third World' countries.
Aside from these value-laden, extravagant representations of abuse and mistreatment, the issue of imperialism deserves a dispassionate look into what it means (both in the past and in the present) for a state to be an imperial power:
e says, “It is one of the oldest known political institutions, characterizing relations between peoples in ancient Mesopotamia, China, and Rome through modern Europe” (7232). While defining imperialism, scholars often are found to be blindfolded by its negative impacts. For
Social-imperialism is a term typically used in an offensive approach to describe people, states that are "socialist in manner imperialist in deeds". The expression is originally used in Leninist circles during the 20th century discussions on the position of the international workers' movement towards the war in European.
Most colonizers imposed their cultures on the colonies because it was seen as a tool to strengthen commerce, political influence, and trade in abroad. There emerged various forms of imperialism including
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Concept of Cultural Imperialism for FREE!