Restorative Justice Restorative Justice According to Camp and Wemmers (2013), restorative justice is a procedure where the parties within the conflict in a precise crime jointly resolve how to compact with the outcome of the crime and its upcoming implications for both parties…
Restorative justice according to some scholars is the opposite of retributive justice since they differ in terms of characteristics, values, and outcomes of the legal process (Daly, 2002). Unlike retributive justice, restorative justice encourages offenders to take responsibilities for their wrongdoing and help them address the causes of their behavior and gives them an opportunity to make the rights their wrong. Miller and Iovanni (2013) supports that restorative justice is presented as a forward-looking problem solving approach to crime that involves the parties themselves and the community in active relationship with various agencies that help solve the crime. It brings victims and offenders in contact with each other thus giving victims an opportunity to get answers to questions that are direct concern to the parties in the disputes. Restorative justice process presents the offenders with the opportunity to offer an apology to their victims thus giving offenders chance to make amends for their wrongdoing. Restorative justice applies as a single set of principles that allows victims, offenders, and communities to have participatory roles in matters that are of direct concern to them. ...
According to Miers (2004), the restorative justice system places all at the mercy of the judicial process unlike retributive justice that only places the victim at the mercy of the judicial system. Stubbs (2007) also adds that the potential advantage of utilizing the restorative justice system is that it allows a victim empowerment and input as a means of addressing the harm caused to the victim. In restorative justice models, the victims have a voice and participate fully hence enable him or her to address all the issues surrounding the case (Daly, 2002). The offender may get to participate fully in the process unlike in other trials where he just sits in the dock to answer questions arising from the charges raised against him. The environment in restorative justice also differs with the environment in other forms of justice. The environment is restorative justice is more communicative and flexible than the courtroom environment making both parties feel comfortable during justice delivery system. According to Rodriges (2007), the direct engagement with the harm caused through communication with the victim has a greater potential for resolution and restoration in the dispute. He adds that through a less formal environment, the process allows for more individualized approach to the needs of the victims while offering a less threatening environment that may interfere with the justice delivery process. The restorative model of justice delivery is a very flexible model for the victims can choose to have a direct role in the restoration process. The results is that the process is less victimizing than the courtrooms and the offenders find themselves in the face with the direct ...
Cite this document
(“Restorative Justice Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/law/110961-restorative-justice
(Restorative Justice Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Restorative Justice Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/law/110961-restorative-justice.
Body Statement I: A crime has the power to hurt its victims, offenders, as well as the community which require a variety of justice needs, and which can be met with the help of restorative justice, thereby reducing crime rates in the future. Body Statement II: Revenge is what an individual cultivates in the form of anger and hatred in his soul, that his consciousness is overcome by the inner demon; Justice’ is the “act of ‘setting things right’ and the ‘restoration of social equilibrium’, which is equivalent to 'forgiveness'.
In other words, the future management issues and trends regarding language interpretation should be tantamount to the prevailing criminal justice system in the US. Thus, the proponent identifies the current and future issues facing courts and court administrators today in the US criminal justice system.
These are some basic similarities to the elements for crimes in both jurisdictions. Beyond this, there are similarities in the systems themselves. Both systems treat mentally disordered offenders similarly, although England appears to have more options for this type of offender.
This would particularly hold much in juvenile justice system where children are active in reading and assimilate what they perceive in the society. To respond to Mrs. I, it would be best to note the best kind of juvenile justice system that may help her child, for example, early youth reforms schools mostly utilized corporal punishment, confinement, and other devices of humiliation as elements to ensure the youth is not only controlled but develops morals (Reader, 1996).
ive principle gains support from many great spiritual traditions’ which include the restoration of the broken bonds of the people who engage in hurting others.
The way we treat others speaks of our background and values that we were brought up with. Having a good
It provides opportunities for all those who are most affected by the crime to be directly involved in responding to the harm caused. All these individuals are known as “Primary Stakeholders”. (Maiese, 2003)
The objectives of Restorative
All these parties are active partakers in the justice system. In most cases, restorative justice programs are defined by mediation between victims and offenders, restorative community services, community decision making and other activities normally intended to enhance
It is evident that in what we call justice, two wrong things make the right. This paper would discuss the competing paradigms of punitive “net widening” policies and restorative justices.
In the system that we have now, a crime
Also included will be some basic comparisons between the elements of crimes in both jurisdictions. In the end, however, the systems are very similar, and the differences between the systems of each country are subtle.