Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

law of tort (problem question) - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Masters
Essay
Law
Pages 6 (1506 words)

Summary

Law of Tort: Traffic Accident Law Name: The Issues in the Case Jack Roberts and Laura Coombs lived together, but they never had new legal documents ascertaining their relationship. Therefore, following the death of Laura, it would be difficult to compensate Roberts following his psychiatric condition prompted by that death…

Extract of sample
law of tort (problem question)

Kevin Browning was drunk or drinking while driving and he should take all the liabilities that followed the accident. Following the police investigation, Kelvin knocked Laura Coombs on the pavement as opposed to on the road. However, he claims that he will not take full responsibilities of the ill health of Robert, whose health deteriorated because of witnessing accident since Robert did not actually see the accident happen. Moreover, according to Norris J. Roberts will not be compensated since he did not have any relationship with Laura. Additionally, Kelvin is appealing the cause not to take any liability of Laura’s mother’s ill health following the death of her daughter facilitated by kelvin’s reckless driving. According to Kelvin, Clare was not at the scene of accident; thus, she is not a witness to the accident. Moreover, she did not see the major body parts of Laura, so she cannot give accounts of what the accident did to her daughter. It is also worth stating that there is not point she appeared shocked on learning that her daughter got involved in an accident and subsequent death. Clare suffered health problems following the death of her daughter and demands that Kelvin should take of her psychiatric medical bills among other attached responsibilities a crewed by the same. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Injuries and losses during the 2012 Olympics
This essay discusses that since the Olympic site has been opened to visitors and athletes for ticket sales and athletes’ training, the persons at the site are presumed to be lawful visitors to the site. As a result the rights of the various athletes and visitors at the site, and the duty toward the safety of those lawfully at the site are covered by the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. By virtue of Section 2(1) of the 1957 Act, occupiers owe a “common duty of care to all his visitors” unless that duty is restricted or waived “by agreement or otherwise”. To this end it is first…
10 pages (2510 words)
Economic Considerations Should be the Basis of Tort Law.
Intentional torts on the other hand refer to harm or injury caused to a person or persons by the intentional misconduct of another or others. Theft, assault, arson and fraud are good examples of causes of intentional torts. Liability torts tend to focus on the damages resulting from a person's act rather than the intention. This means that if an action causes harm, the performer of the same is liable regardless of whether they exercised the expected degree of care or not or whether the action was maliciously done or was a result of an accident. The economic framework states that each society…
9 pages (2259 words)
TORT LAW- PROBLEM QUESTION
This was the original negligent act, so the analysis must stem from this. Below is the analysis of the situation, with a conclusion that outlines the probable outcome. Since this action is one that is based upon negligence, the scenario will be analyzed using the elements of negligence – duty, breach, causation and damages. Duty The first element that must be examined in this action, and any other negligence action, is duty. As far as duty goes, there does not need to be privity between the parties – anybody who might be harmed because of the actions of the person causing the negligence is…
8 pages (2008 words)
Tort Law
However, in the two cases, the complainant (the person harmed) has entitlement to compensation by the offender (accused). In the later, the acts that lead to such an injury or loss are not intentional or expected. Nevertheless, there are some torts, which involve accidents that would have been prevented with care and as such does not constitute torts of negligence. Normally negligence torts involve parties that share four elements including, where one party had the responsibility of protecting the other(S) and or the party fails to exercise such care as expected. Moreover, there exists a…
10 pages (2510 words)
Tort Law Question: 'the law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinction
In White V Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others1, it stated by Lord Steyn that “the law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinctions which are difficult to justify.” Clearly, this view of the Judge acknowledged the complication and challenges of defining psychological injuries and offering damages for them. One of the core areas that psychological damage occurs is where a person does not go through any physical damage but sues on the grounds of pure psychiatric harm or psychological injury. This is problematic and…
10 pages (2510 words)
The Law of Tort
Ancillary claims are founded on accusations of intentional infliction of emotional distress.4 The discussion that follows examines the development of the Tort of Trespass and the available defences to such claims.…
20 pages (5020 words)
British Tort Law
For any one party to be held responsible for violation of the tort law, the claimant must establish that there is a duty of care and that there has been a breach of that duty to cause damage or loss to the claimant that needs to be compensated by an award of damages. There is a breach of the duty-of-care principle if the defendant is proven to have failed to do what a reasonable person will do in the situation presented.…
10 pages (2510 words)