StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Law of tort (problem question) - Essay Example

Nobody downloaded yet

Extract of sample
Law of tort (problem question)

Kevin Browning was drunk or drinking while driving and he should take all the liabilities that followed the accident. Following the police investigation, Kelvin knocked Laura Coombs on the pavement as opposed to on the road. However, he claims that he will not take full responsibilities of the ill health of Robert, whose health deteriorated because of witnessing accident since Robert did not actually see the accident happen. Moreover, according to Norris J. Roberts will not be compensated since he did not have any relationship with Laura. Additionally, Kelvin is appealing the cause not to take any liability of Laura’s mother’s ill health following the death of her daughter facilitated by kelvin’s reckless driving. According to Kelvin, Clare was not at the scene of accident; thus, she is not a witness to the accident. Moreover, she did not see the major body parts of Laura, so she cannot give accounts of what the accident did to her daughter. It is also worth stating that there is not point she appeared shocked on learning that her daughter got involved in an accident and subsequent death. Clare suffered health problems following the death of her daughter and demands that Kelvin should take of her psychiatric medical bills among other attached responsibilities a crewed by the same. Law: The laws to be regarded in this case are those that are related to the road accident and to what extent should be the accused (Kelvin) should be responsible to the persons affected following the accident. Application: In this case, Kelvin is noted to have problems or have refused to take care of duty owing to the psychiatric harm he caused to both Jack and Clare. Additionally, Norris J. also, for the first time, dismissed Jack’s claims that the accident and subsequent death of Laura had led to his health problem. According to Norris, Jack is not in any way a primary victim of circumstances. Moreover, he lacked all grounds that Jack could be treated as a secondary victim. Law: However, according to the Road Traffic Accident, any witness who suffers any recognizable psychiatric disorder including post stress disorder due to the accident can file claims for damages for persons that have caused the accident. Application: In this case, it is a fact that Jack has suffered psychiatric disorder following the death of Laura from the accident caused by Kelvin1. Therefore, it would be prudent if Kelvin pay all the damages caused on Jack following the accident and death of the Laura. If such is considered, the Jack will be treated a road traffic accident witness. Notably, had it not for the death, it can never be ascertained beyond any reasonable doubt that Jack could have suffered such health problems. When Jack went out and saw what happened to Laura, he might have suffered from nervous shock. Jack’s case can be related to the Hambrook v Stoke2 and or Bros Dulieu v White3 cases where in both cases, the victims were awarded the damages caused to them by accidents they witnessed. Just like it may be in any other case that nature of Jack’s injury was reasonably foreseeable and was never in any case caused by his own negligence. He had to have been in the scene of accident by the virtue that Laura was her partner, she came to his place, and by his own doorsteps, the accident happened. Therefore, he had to be there and follow her to the hospital4. Therefore, if Norris never wants to compel Kelvin to pay all health damages he has went through ...Show more


Law of Tort: Traffic Accident Law Name: The Issues in the Case Jack Roberts and Laura Coombs lived together, but they never had new legal documents ascertaining their relationship. Therefore, following the death of Laura, it would be difficult to compensate Roberts following his psychiatric condition prompted by that death…
Author : tsmitham
Law of tort (problem question)
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Law of tort (problem question)"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

A detailed discussion in respect an occupier was provided in the decision of Wheat v Lacon1. In respect of the facts at hand it is evident that Eric is the owner of the museum and has sufficient control over the premises to be considered as an occupier. Occupiers Liability Act 1957 deals with lawful visitors as described in s.1(2) whereby a common duty of care is owed to such visitors.
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Economic Considerations Should be the Basis of Tort Law
Tort law covers most of civil lawsuits. The law is usually split into three basic categories. Negligent torts refer to harm and injury caused to people when the torfesor fails to exercise the level of care expected of them. Such negligent torts include accidents.
9 pages (2250 words) Essay
In brief, the driver of the police car, PC Swift, was driving recklessly. Ahmed, the driver of the ambulance, was not. Because of the collision, Sheila suffered brain damage that would not have occurred if the ambulance had arrived at the expected time. While it appears that the collision would break the chain of causation, therefore Kent Ambulance would not be liable, the facts are complicated by the fact that Ahmed had made the decision to arrive 10 minutes late.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Tort Law
However, the classifications of the wrong as committed are done over a wide range of considerations in order to verify such a claim. For instance there are torts which result from an intentional motive by a person to harm another (intentional torts) while there are others that result from one’s faults but are not intentional.
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Tort Law Question: 'the law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinction
However, unlike physical injury which is witnessed physically and can be identified through medical reports and other things, psychological injuries are emotional and individual-based. A person who goes through them cannot show much proof. Thus, there is a challenge in defining the extent of psychological damage or injuries that a person goes through.
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Irish tort law
After knowing the limitations the same will be evaluated on the basis of the comment stated earlier. In making the evaluation, we will conclude whether there is basis to make a proposal with corresponding reason, if any.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Problem question in the law of tort
inciple for determining the existence of a duty of care was laid down in Donoghue v Stevenson1 where Lord Atkin said that a duty of care is owed to one’s “neighbour”-i.e. persons who are so closely and directly affected by one’s actions that one should reasonably foresee
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Tort Law
Mike must prove that the police have been negligent in performing their duty and he must equally prove that the police owe a duty of care to him. He will begin by proving causation. It should be noted
9 pages (2250 words) Essay
The extracts of the article claimed to be defamatory are the following: “Ninety years ago the Poppy Appeal devised a symbol that was appropriate to their aims. Back in the 1920s most Britains had uncles
7 pages (1750 words) Essay
1.Economic considerations, and not justice, should be the basis of tort law. Critically discuss, limiting your analysis to these three theories of tort law: deterrence, corrective justice and distributive justice
Such negligent torts include accidents. Intentional torts on the other hand refer to harm or injury caused to a person or persons by the intentional misconduct of another or others. Theft, assault, arson
9 pages (2250 words) Essay
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Let us find you another Essay on topic Law of tort (problem question) for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
Join us:
Contact Us