Judicial activism

High school
Essay
Law
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
Judicial activism and restraint are points of controversy for politicians, general public and the Supreme Court itself. Judicial activism refers to the court's willingness to become involved in major issues and the extent that it makes decisions based on constitutional grounds…

Introduction


In Roper v. Simmons, a seventeen year old by the name of Simmons confessed that he plotted the murder and burglary of an older woman. This case placed the question before the Courts as to whether or not a person younger than eighteen years old should be punished with the death penalty when convicted of crimes that would typically mandated capital punishment. The seventeen year old was originally sentenced to death for his crimes. This decision was later overturned by the Missouri Supreme Court and the defendant's sentence was converted to life imprisonment. The Missouri Supreme Court stated that although there were cases that illustrated that there was a precedent set that allowed for capital punishment for those persons under the age of eighteen, that a 'national consensus has developed against the execution of juvenile offenders'(2005). This case has since been heard by the United States Supreme Courts. Judicial activism and restraint are concepts that can be readily viewed in the Roper v. Simmons case when it was decided by the Supreme Court in March 2005.
The majority opinion addressed both the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments when considering the affirmation of the Missouri Supreme Court decision. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Judicial activism of the European Court of Justice
In spite of this, the ECJ tends to take a cautious approach in adopting the policy. It is worth noting that the ECJ has a constant need to develop general principles for procedural purposes, which can sometimes be interpreted as activism (Kelly 315). Unlike federal states, there is no hierarchy relation between European community laws and national laws. Therefore, these two sets of laws coexist in…
Texas v. Hopwood
In many instances, the Supreme Court plus other federal judicial bodies not only have surpassed their constitutional limits, but have disputed the principle of federalism that ought to safeguard the balance of power between the national government and the governments of the states. Hopwood v. Texas Hopwood v. Texas remains one of the most intensively litigated cases featuring the long battle over…
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM BY EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
In case of ambiguities in the text of the Treaties, ECJ has to employ its creative talents so as to accomplish an acceptable elucidation and application of Community law. ECJ has filled in the gaps and removed the imprecision in the provinces of Community law thereby removing the barrier of restricted jurisdiction and is able to develop its authority and role. The main aim of this research essay…
Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism
Below is another case of judicial activism, in which a school district had its policies overturned by the court. This should be considered to be activism, as the school district is not allowed by the court to pass policies for itself that would help remedy individual cases of discrimination. However, since this case cases involves reverse discrimination, this case would not be decried by the…
Judicial activism
In Roper v. Simmons, a seventeen year old by the name of Simmons confessed that he plotted the murder and burglary of an older woman. This case placed the question before the Courts as to whether or not a person younger than eighteen years old should be punished with the death penalty when convicted of crimes that would typically mandated capital punishment. The seventeen year old was originally…
Judicial Review
Who will then protect the ordinary citizen from suffering from the wrath of the angry Queen of Hearts and give them a chance to have their cases reconsidered and to achieve procedural and substantive justice…
The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent
The doctrine of judicial precedent has undergone profound transformations from Eighteenth century onwards in accordance with the changing world. It is not a static concept but constantly evolving. Hence, the difficulty to grasp the relevance and scope of the doctrine of judicial precedent within the English legal system arises. In other words, since the doctrine of judicial precedent is a dynamic…