StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

PUBLIC/PRIVATE DIVIDE/STANDING IN JUDICIAL REVIEW - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
PUBLIC/PRIVATE DIVIDE/STANDING IN JUDICIAL REVIEW

Sources of power, private law, and public law issues, order 53 and Locus Standi should be discussed gradually.
This question raises some issues from public body, private and public law issues, and locus standi. In order to answer this question, it is necessary to have a clear knowledge about pre-1977, S 31(1) of Supreme Court Act 1981, O .53, and situation after reform. It is also necessary to explain the background to this development and decision of O'Reilly v Mackman 1, public body, private and public law issues, sources of power and the exceptions of O'Reilly v Mackman. Prior to 1977, people were likely to use private law for its advantages. The problems were short time limit, requirements of LS, unavailability of discovery, and inflexibility regarding remedies.
However, the decision of the Architectural Academy (AA) regarding the subject of scholarship will be amenable to claims for judicial review if it is public body and the issues are public law issues. Four weeks before the beginning of the coming academic year, the trustees of the AA decide to cease offering financial scholarships with immediate effect.
JR is only available against public bodies, not private bodies. The sources of inferior bodies power is the traditional approach to determine a public body. In R v Panel on take-overs and Mergers ex parte Datafin Ltd 2, the CA held that the Panel was amenable to JR despite the fact that it was a self-regulatory body operated by the City whose powers derived neither from statute nor the prerogative. This functional approach can be illustrated bellow. Section 6(3) provides that public authority will include 'any person certain of whose functions of a public nature' and s6 provides they uphold convention rights [Poplar Housing v Donoghue], [Leonard Cheshire Foundation] 3.
In R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board ex p Lain 4, the board should be subject to review as if it was set up under statute. In Harriot 5, an ad hoc committee and in Scott v National Trust 6, the national trust could be public body. Hoffman LJ observed in ex p The Aga Khan 7 felt that Jockey Club was not to be subject to JR because it did not form part of a system of governmental control. Court adopts sources of power test. The Aga Khan is to taken as indicative of the correct approach in determining reviewability. However, form the question it is clear that AA would be amenable to claims for judicial review, if court adopt sources of power test, because the powers derives from statutes.

In Cocks v Thanet DC 8, HL held that an action against local authority for breach of statutory duty is abuse of process. It would only be allowed by way of JR. In Ali v Tower Hamlets LBC 9 CA held that determination of suitability of accommodation also fell within the public law. Clarification finally came in British steel PLC v Customs and Excise Commissioner 10

1) If litigation touches only on public law issue, the complaint must generally seek remedy by way of JR.
2) Where the complaint enjoys a ...Show more

Summary

The citizen when seeking to challenge the powers of the state is fundamental principles in the process of judicial review. The essence of judicial review is that an 'inferior body' (other expressions employed include subordinate body; administrative body, or administrative agency) has acted outside the scope of its power…
Author : reinholdkrajcik
PUBLIC/PRIVATE DIVIDE/STANDING IN JUDICIAL REVIEW essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"PUBLIC/PRIVATE DIVIDE/STANDING IN JUDICIAL REVIEW"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Judicial Review
The traditional meaning of judicial review was illustrated in two instances. First is in Federalist No. 78 and second is in the case of Marbury Vs. Madison (5 U.S. 137). “Laws which are contrary to the Constitution are therefore void because the interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts (Federalist No.
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Analyse the extent to which the rules of standing and the grounds of judicial review have struck the right balance between helpi
It is the duty of the law makers to make sure that everyone should seek justice in time and in accordance with the laws in vogue since justice delayed amounts to justice denied. Victims have the fundamental right to approach certain legal channels that exist within the UK legal system, the subordinate courts, High Courts and the Supreme Court as the case may be1.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Literature Review on Culture in Public and Private Preschools
According to the report the idea of organisation culture has become relevant in varied field and it has continued to change. This is because of rapid changing environments since organisations are rethinking in order to accomplish their objectives in the contemporary global competitive working and learning environment.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Judicial Review
.. Once the Osmosis of the above scenario clears in the reader's mind it is possible to discern a pattern where as the Queen of Hearts (later rhetorically referred to as "nothing-but a pack of Cards" by Alice) is equivalent to the Modern Executive with its unfettered discretion to use and abuse its powers, lock up and detain people at its own will, apply legislation in an oppressive manner and the list goes on.
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Constitutional & Judicial Review
13470/87) to find out whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach of law according to Article 10 of the Human Rights Act. This is a private association with legal personality under Austrian law. On 23rd August 2004, The Court, in accordance with Article 43 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("The Convention") about a film showing religious blasphemy with direct attack on Pope, ruled that Article 10 has not been violated and supported Austrian Government's move to ban the film because 'interference with expression is necessary where a large section of the community finds the views expressed offensive.'
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Judicial review
formed; prohibition, which orders that an action should not be undertaken as it is unauthorized; a declaration, which defines the legal rights or obligations or an injunction. In short, judicial review is that power of a court, which empowers it to scrutinize a law or an
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Judicial Review- public law
The justification for such interference was elaborated upon by Lord Hoffmann in R (ProLife) v. BBC. In this context, he had stated that there was a deferential relationship between the judiciary, and the executive and the legislature. However, was unwilling to
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Administrative Law Judicial Review
incorporation of the European Convention of the Human Rights (the Convention) (implemented through the Human Rights Act 1998) requires judicial review to ensure that public authorities do not “act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right4”. Furthermore,
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Literature Review on Culture in public and private preschools
This concept may affect the way community or groups of people interact; thus, culture is highly taken into consideration in any organisation to avoid creating
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Judicial Review
2. The claimant herein was suspended through the decision of the head teacher, The Gladbury Grange School, Mr. D J Carey via a letter dated 22nd December 2014 and under Section 51A of The Education Act, 2002. The said Head Master expelled her on the grounds that the
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation