Tort Law Ph.D. - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Tort Law Ph.D.

Prior to the regulations on electronic music equipment, which were introduced in 1990's the present music equipment was very sensitive to electro-magnetic interference. After 1990's it has to comply with specific standards that make it more immune to this sort of interference, that the problem experienced by Mr Morris would not be encountered with guitars produced according to these regulations.
The interference is due to the sensitiveness of the recording equipment the foreseeing of nuisance by the Railways does not arise. It would arise if the interference were caused because of the sensitivity of the TI 21. "Railtrack could not reasonably have foreseen that these track circuits could have caused problems of electromagnetic interference at a distance of 60 to 70 meters."
The court believed that playing the guitar with sensitive electric and electronic music instrument such as an amplifier is not an abnormal but an ordinary enjoyment of property, it is feature of modern life and it is material for many younger generation's pleasure and also a vital part of the modern music generation.
The trial court believed the fact that electromagnetic interference was caused not only to the complaint alone but it caused to other users of such instrument also well before the track circuit was installed within that vicinity. ...
Download paper


2. Railtrack was incorporated in April, 1994 pursuance of Railways Act 1993 for the purpose of taking over the provision of track access to train operations from the British Railways Board, and was later renamed Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd. The functions of the Railtrack include provision, installation, testing and maintenance of signaling systems and track circuits on the railway lines…
Author : aiden34

Related Essays

Tort Law
In essence, tort law is applicable in circumstances where an individual’s or a group’s negligence, carelessness, and/or failure to take precautionary actions results in other parties’ to incurring pain, losses, discomfort, harm, incapacitation and/or death3. Although they may cause losses and pain to their victims and their loved ones, it should be clear from the onset that not all tort cases are criminal acts. It is therefore imperative that the victim of another’s negligence or carelessness seeks compensation for the loss or pain suffered. In case a victim dies, his/her loved ones or...
8 pages (2008 words) Essay
Tort Law Case Study
‘ACE sports’, as the organisation, was responsible for building the brand new backboard and rim in the school playground where the accident took place. It can be ascertained as one of the potentially liable entities in this scenario as depicted a significant extent of negligence in preparing the backboard and especially rim. The rim had small loose metal prices which can be a result of a lack of focus on product quality by the company. It should have given top priority towards ensuring and building a safe and a secure sporting arena. Also, the topmost priority should have been given to the...
3 pages (753 words) Case Study
Tort Law
However, in the two cases, the complainant (the person harmed) has entitlement to compensation by the offender (accused). In the later, the acts that lead to such an injury or loss are not intentional or expected. Nevertheless, there are some torts, which involve accidents that would have been prevented with care and as such does not constitute torts of negligence. Normally negligence torts involve parties that share four elements including, where one party had the responsibility of protecting the other(S) and or the party fails to exercise such care as expected. Moreover, there exists a...
10 pages (2510 words) Essay
Law of Tort Master Case Study
Stevenson (1932). It is well established that an employers owes a duty of care to his employee. In a negligence action, the employee will have to show that the employer's conduct fell below the standard that could be expected of reasonable employer. Because of the indirect relationship between Harry's wife and the three companies, the neighbour test should be considered. The courts will consider the interests of the victims whilst being fair to the said negligent parties. This brings in the question of sufficient relationship of proximity between the plaintiff and the defendant. 1...
8 pages (2008 words) Case Study
Tort Law Case Study
Ms. Smith did not have vehicle insurance at the time of the accident and, consequentially, had been convicted on 12th July 2006 (two days prior to the date of the accident) of having no insurance according to section 143 of the Road Traffic Act of 1988. Ms. Smith suffered a broken left fibula and three cracked ribs. She was in pain for three months and was unable to go to work for four weeks. Ms. Smith turned 21 yesterday....
10 pages (2510 words) Case Study
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!