StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Burden and Standard of Proof - Case Study Example

Nobody downloaded yet

Extract of sample
Burden and Standard of Proof

Accordingly, the claimant usually bears the legal burden (and by necessity an evidential burden) of proving all the elements of his claim. Similarly, the defendant bears the legal (and evidential) burden of proving any defence and/or counter claim against the claimant.
The burden of proof in criminal cases: The basic rule was laid down by Viscount Sankey LC in Woolmington v DPP3, 'Throughout the web of the English criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen, that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoners guilt4'.
It would be possible to justify the rule as part of a policy to avoid embarrassing criticisms of the administration of justice by minimising wrongful convictions. These are more likely to be avoided if the burden is fixed in this way then if an accused person has to prove his innocence. It is also possible to justify the rule by appeal to principle. For example, it would be a necessary feature of the law if it were accepted that, in Dworkin's words, people have a profound right not to be convicted of crimes of which they are innocent.
Viscount Sankey said that the rule was subject to exceptions in the case of the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception. But there have been Challenges to the idea that it is ever just to place a legal burden of proof on defendants.

Standard of Proof of civil and criminal cases: In criminal cases the standard of proof to which the prosecution must prove its case has been variously described as 'beyond reasonable doubt' (Woolmington v DPP5). In Miller v Minister of pensions6, Denning J described the standard of proof in civil cases as follows:

If the evidence is such that the tribunal can say; 'we think it more probable than not,' the burden is discharged, but, if the probabilities are equal, it is not. There are, however, some exceptional cases where the criminal standard of proof is required:

(a) Contempt of court (Re Bramble vale Ltd7; Dean v Dean8)
(b) Where a person's livelihood is a stake (R v Milk Marketing Board, ex p Austin the Times, 21 March 1987).
(c) Allegations of misconduct amounting to a criminal offence in disciplinary hearings (Re A Solicitor9, R (on the application of s) v Governing Body of YP School10).
(d) Where statute requires the criminal standard of proof (Judd v Ministers of Pensions and National Insurance11).

Presumption of innocence:
Legal burdens on defendants may have to be considered in the light of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is now incorporated into English law Under the Human Rights Act 199812. The ECHR, Article 6(2) provides that every one with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until provided guilty according to law.

The leading authority is Attorney-General's Reference (No 4 of 2002)13, from which the following principle may be distilled.

a) The Defendant has a right to a fair trial,
b) The Presumption of innocence is an important but not an absolute right and so derogations from the principle are permitted.
c) The ECHR require a balance to be struck between the rights of the individual and wider interests ...Show more


In order to answer this question it is necessary to discuss the burden of proof in civil and criminal cases, Standard of Proof of civil and criminal cases, and relevant case laws. The law recognizes two principle burden these are legal burden and evidential burden…
Author : demetris57
Burden and Standard of Proof
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
"Burden and Standard of Proof"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Carnival Cruise Lines
The terms & conditions of Passage Contract Ticket specify: in No. 3 (a) that acceptance of ticket is deemed agreement to the terms and conditions thereon; and in No. 8 signifying agreement between passenger and Carrier that all disputes arising from the contract ticket shall be exclusively litigated before a court in Florida.
3 pages (750 words) Case Study
Business and law
This is because the written law that provides for the application of the principles of common law and equity in these the countries does not expressly state that these principles are in force. 1It however provides that the High Court or the Supreme Court, and the Magistrates Courts exercise their jurisdiction in accordance with these principles, but subject to such modifications as local circumstances render necessary.
14 pages (3500 words) Case Study
In such a case if one party, without the mutual consent of the subsequent party, fails to perform his obligation, the aggrieved party has the right to seek redress for the breach of the contract through normal enforcement procedures - civil court. There are two major types of contracts: contracts by deed and simple contracts.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Contracts forming
Sec. 11 of Sale of goods Act 1979 clearly specifies that "where there is an agreement to sell specific goods and subsequently the goods, without any fault on the part of the seller or buyer ,perish before the risk passes to the buyer, the said agreement is avoided."And in this case the buyer can not seek cosequential damages because the contract is void,but he
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
The Role of Utmost Good Faith in Insurance Law
Insurance law is based upon the law of contract, whereby the contractual duties are primarily upheld by courts as they represent the freedoms between individuals concerning business dealings. In addition, the elements of a valid contract are so tightly defined that to override them would make a mockery of an individual’s right to deal.
12 pages (3000 words) Case Study
Law of Tort Master Case Study
In this particular case, we note that Betty was not employed by any of the three companies; it is her husband Harry who was employed by the three companies. The companies therefore do not owe Betty a duty of care directly. The duty care was established by Donoghue V.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Consumer Law Case Study
Judge made law is the law decided by the Judges while pronouncing the judgments in deferent cases in different circumstances. The judges while dealing with different cases make some guidelines in adjudication of the offence. Statue law is the basic law, which is superior to the judge made law.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Business law
It was evident that the injury was caused due to the negligence of the shop owner, and that Henry could sue the management of The Learned Wig for damages under the existing English Law. The warning put by the management would in no way was
5 pages (1250 words) Case Study
Data provides critical insights on children in the age groups 1-4 and 5-14 taking asthma consultations, the number of which was 275 per 10,000 in England in 2005 and 462 in Wales respectively. Incidentally, in 2006, 45 and 23 per 10,000 aged between
13 pages (3250 words) Case Study
Standard War:Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD
In Toshiba’s point of view there were a series of analysis that are meant to discover the factors that influenced the failure of HD-DVD in the 2005-2008 standard war. These included flaws in the technology used, allies
7 pages (1750 words) Case Study
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Burden and Standard of Proof for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
Join us:
Contact Us