Burden and Standard of Proof - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Burden and Standard of Proof

Accordingly, the claimant usually bears the legal burden (and by necessity an evidential burden) of proving all the elements of his claim. Similarly, the defendant bears the legal (and evidential) burden of proving any defence and/or counter claim against the claimant.
The burden of proof in criminal cases: The basic rule was laid down by Viscount Sankey LC in Woolmington v DPP3, 'Throughout the web of the English criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen, that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoners guilt4'.
It would be possible to justify the rule as part of a policy to avoid embarrassing criticisms of the administration of justice by minimising wrongful convictions. These are more likely to be avoided if the burden is fixed in this way then if an accused person has to prove his innocence. It is also possible to justify the rule by appeal to principle. For example, it would be a necessary feature of the law if it were accepted that, in Dworkin's words, people have a profound right not to be convicted of crimes of which they are innocent.
Viscount Sankey said that the rule was subject to exceptions in the case ...
Download paper

Summary

In order to answer this question it is necessary to discuss the burden of proof in civil and criminal cases, Standard of Proof of civil and criminal cases, and relevant case laws. The law recognizes two principle burden these are legal burden and evidential burden…
Author : demetris57

Related Essays

Insolvency Law: Wrongful and Fraudulent Trading
Insolvency Law: Wrongful and Fraudulent Trading ...
8 pages (2008 words) Essay
Principled Investigations Essay
Further, if a serious violent incident has taken place, the police can stop and search suspects without having reasonable grounds for suspecting they will find the items. (Schmalleger, 2002) The police must however provide suspects with the following information before the search can begin: proof of their warrant card, information on police powers to stop and search, information on your rights, the police officer's name and police station, the reason for the search and what they think they might find when they search you. When the suspects are arrested the police can search them for anything...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Equity and Trust Law Essay
The inflexibility of the no conflict rule and the no profit rule seems hardly fair in field where discretion requires the utmost flexibility in decision-making. The no profit rule has also been segregated from the no conflict rule6 and the rationalization of the no profit rule makes sense. In Swain v Law Society Oliver LJ stated that no profit rule is predicated on the distinct principle that obtaining a profit without authorization is a breach of fiduciary duties because the profit itself is actually trust property.7 The no profit rule is therefore not entirely inflexible as trustees may make...
8 pages (2008 words) Essay
Are court and tribunals in the English legal system now indistinguishable in all important respects?
The content of the law here include things like criminal offences and civil wrongs. Here the distinction between a crime and civil wrong cannot be stated as depending upon what is done because what is done may be the same in each case. The true distinction lies therefore not in the nature of the wrongful act but in the legal consequences that follow it. The instances above thus are addressed, heard and determined at very different places which bring us to the court system of the English legal system. This court system is divided or subdivided into either the criminal court system which...
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
Evidence Burden
A defendant charged with murder could claim diminished responsibility or insanity1 permitting prosecution to adduce other defence and the same applies to unfitness to plead and stand trial. Woolmington ruling places the burden of proving on defendant2 and at times, had been questionable....
10 pages (2510 words) Essay
Reversing the Burden of Proof
The International Covenant on Civil, Cultural and Political Rights (ICCPR) contains iron-clad guarantees to protect the rights of the accused facing trial for a crime. Articles 9, 14 and 15 spell out these rights in great detail - from the presumption of innocence to the right against self-incrimination to the right against double jeopardy and to the famous Miranda doctrine. Closer to home, under Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights, an accused enjoys a presumption of innocence. (Keane, 2006) At a time when human rights advocacy for the accused has been made unpopular by the...
8 pages (2008 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!