Bluechester City Council v Doncaster Wagons Ltd

Masters
Case Study
Law
Pages 6 (1506 words)
Download 0
The topic of the advice is the occupancy and position of the land. The 1925 land act states that the members of public can exercise their right of their use of metropolitan common land. The land or free state mentioned in the case is not metropolitan common land and the free exercise of the right of use shall be restricted…

Introduction

If any building or a fence is erected or any construction is done, it cannot be lawful without the consent of the minister. They will order inquiries as are directed by the commons act 1876. The county courts are entitled to convict the person or the organisation that constructed the fence or any erection has been done. The order mentioned above is subjected to appeal in the higher court according to section thirty of commons act, 1876. These are the conditions that apply to the land which is declared common before the possession of it was given to a person, lord, manor or to an organisation for any purpose of public or private interest. In such conditions the parking of vehicles, erection of cabin, construction of fence by Doncaster wagons can be considered illegal and can be complained to the country court or any relevant government agency. The problem lying here is that the Blue Chester city council did not take any legal action the 12 years of duration. Now the legal question arises that after this much term of negligence towards occupation does the Bluechester city council do have any legal right to take action on Doncaster Wagons ltd. (Swarb.co.uk, 2007)
There is every chance for the risk of Doncaster acquiring the possession rights as the title to the land is not registered. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816.
8). Cane (2011, p. 15) explains that as a legal maxim, the rule of law implies that decisions made by the government should be based on the existing legal principles; it insists that law should govern the society. The proponents of the rule of law argue that it is the foundation of society’s order and freedom since it treats all citizens as equals and therefore none is above the law, not even…
Keegan v Newcastle United Football Co Ltd
2million in addition to interest which will be assessed if the parties do not agree. In the United Kingdom, Constructive dismissal is covered under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (Prichard, 2005, p. 15) Facts Mr Keegan was appointed the Manager of the Club (for the second time) under a written Contract signed and dated 16 January 2008. The then Chairman of the Club, Chris Mort, had approached him…
Narni Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Limited [1998] VSC 146
The conduct of National Australia Bank Limited clearly shown there was an agreement to exceed the overdraft Limit hence creating an implied term in the contract which barred the bank from terminating the extended overdraft limit without a notice. Narni suffered losses from the dishonor of the cheques hence had to sue the bank for damages. Implied term of arrangement and why significant for Narni…
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The hearing took place at eight thirty in the morning on the eightieth of September 2012. The regulatory matter/item of the hearing was the motion over amending subsection (a) of Section 21.30 of the Los Angeles Municipal Policy (Jobs and Business Development Committee 3) The council had a crucial debate over the matter of the amending subsection (a) of Section 21.30 of the Los Angeles Municipal…
Critically evaluate the Court of Appeal decision in Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 361 with particular ref
With the terms and conditions of service being directed by Regus, Epcot Solutions Ltd expected to be given the best service as the contract form outlined the same. With many cases of inadequacies especially with the pertinent issue of air conditioning that was defective, Epcot raised concerns on the same. However, Regus did not make any amends to ensure that the issue of the faulty air…
Case Brief: LONG ISLAND CARE AT HOME, LTD v. COKE, 551 US 158 (2007)
Coke is a reversed and remanded case. The rule of this case further involved “filling of a statutory gap”, as per Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion. Long Island Care had employed Coke as a healthcare attendant for its elderly home services and thus had an employer-employee relationship amid them. Eventually, Coke filed a case against the employer on the grounds of minimum wage and overtime…
Bluechester City Council v Doncaster Wagons Ltd
If any building or a fence is erected or any construction is done, it cannot be lawful without the consent of the minister. They will order inquiries as are directed by the commons act 1876. The county courts are entitled to convict the person or the organisation that constructed the fence or any erection has been done. The order mentioned above is subjected to appeal in the higher court according…