StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Law Master - Case Study Example

Nobody downloaded yet
Over a period of time, it is creating problems over the ownership of the house when the sharer dies or leaves the shared home for another place (Sharing Homes, The problem).
The discussion paper sources these problems to the ambiguity of the current law guiding these shared homes. The present law is not very clear on payments made by the sharer on behalf of the owner. For instance, mortgage payments made by the sharer are enough for staking a claim on the home. But, sometimes, the sharer regularly pays the household bills enabling the owner to pay the mortgage instalments. Sometimes, the sharer may look after the household work like
As per the law detailed in the discussion paper, a person who is not a legal owner but sharing the shelter in a home can claim an interest on it only when there is an equity arising by proprietary estoppel, when a resulting or constructive trust has arisen in his / her favour or when the sharer becomes a beneficiary under an express declaration of trust. In any of these circumstances, the sharer has to prove his / her right with sufficient proof. Because of these limited options available to the sharer, the law is termed as complex, arbitrary and uncertain in application. It is also ill suited to determining the proprietary rights of the home sharers. The discussion paper is of the opinion that the rules of implied trusts and proprietary estoppel are not as clear as they should be (Sharing Homes, Part I, introduction).

Trusts and proprietary estoppel

An express trust arises when a person expressly declares that he or she holds property on trust for another or transfers property to another expressly subject to a trust. A resulting trust or constructive trust is part of an implied trust. A resulting trust arises when a person purchases property in somebody's name or makes direct financial contribution to the acquisition of property in somebody's name. A constructive trust arises with an agreement, arrangement or


understanding between two people with a common intention that a property should be shared beneficially through which one person relies to his or her detriment. Proprietary estoppel arises when a person is encouraged or allowed to believe by an owner of land that he or she has certain rights in or over it and the former acts in that belief to his or her detriment (Sharing Homes, Part II, the current law).

Case studies

Several case studies relating to the shared homes highlight the ambiguity in the law. For example, let us discuss the case, Burns Vs Burns in which the plaintiff's claim to stake a beneficial interest in the house on grounds of constructive trust was dismissed by the court. The facts of the case are as follows (Facts and 2.75). Valerie Burns, the plaintiff and Patrick Burns, the defendant lived together for 19 years , 17 years in the disputed home, without a marriage. Defendant bought the house in his ...Show more
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Law Master Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Law Master Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Law Master Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times


The Law Commission Discussion Paper on Sharing Homes, first published online on July 18, 2002 and presented to the Parliament of UK in November 2002, points out the complex nature of the law guiding the Shared Homes (Sharing Homes, a discussion paper). Covering a broad range of people including married and unmarried couples, friends, relatives or others who share homes for any reason, the discussion paper closely examines the difficulties experienced by the partners in money matters or by the banks or financial institutions in recovery of loans in relation to shared homes where there are no registered agreements between the sharing couples.
Author : stephanmarquard
Law Master Case Study
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
"Law Master Case Study"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Tort Law Master Case Study
Brown which would have been "different from [the damage] suffered by the general public,"2 which would constitute a wrong that is identifiably a crime under torts law. Mr. Brown's case is indeed special because he was allowed to find a document not available to the general public.
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Company Law Master Case Study
In accordance with the above provisions Madona can inspect the register of members of Posh Cars Limited containing the names, addresses, and the details of shareholding of all the members of the company at the registered office of the company. In case any regulation has been enacted specifying the maintenance of the register of members by the Secretary of state then the register of members can be expected in such place.
12 pages (3000 words) Case Study
Criminal Law Master Case Study
'(Rahee,(1866)Unrep Cr C6)' The fact that the death of a human being is caused is not enough. Actus reus and Mens Rea both should be proved by the prosecution. "The general basis for imposing liability in criminal law is that the defendant must be proved to have committed a guilty act whilst having had a guilty state of mind.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Consumer Law Master Case Study
The work will be based on the Consumer Credit Act 2006, Unfair Contract Terms Act and Trade Descriptions Act 1968. There are the two basic documents for consumer protection within the UK, which provide the buyer with the right to receive the goods he buys in good condition, without any misleading trade descriptions.
7 pages (1750 words) Case Study
Employment Law Master Case Study
Since there has not been a proper procedure undertaken by Biosynth to establish whether Parveen and Joshua's behaviour or actions were minor acts of misconduct or grave acts of misconduct, the two employees remain as such until a proper termination and dismissal occurs.
7 pages (1750 words) Case Study
Property Law Master Case Study
With the facts of the case given in the above cited case of Amy and Brian with regard to their purchased house in the name of Brian, hereto are the grounds for the claim of Amy in the aforesaid property to wit: Based on the decided case Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset1 of the House of Lords which re-affirmed the essential elements of the establishment of a constructive trust it stated that, "(1) That the parties must share a common intention to share the ownership of the land concerned which may be either expressed or implied from the conduct of the parties; (2) That the party claiming beneficial intention by way of a constructive trust must show proof that she significantly altered her position
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Family Law Master Case Study
She came back and made an effort for reconciliation in her marriage by coming back to live with Michael after three months separation, after a strong dispute and quarrel, when she moved out to stay with friend.. And within this period was confirmed about the disharmony in their marriage with mutual verbal abuse and bickering.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
PUBLIC LAW Master Case Study
Geoff Daniels, in protest against the visit of the Zimbabwean government delegation to GDXS plc. The party plans to utilise this opportunity to publicly undermine the workings of the Zimbabwean government and voice the ideologies of the Party. Under the provisions of Section 14, the chief officer is at liberty to impose certain conditionalities on a public assembly, if it is deemed necessary to do so, in the interests of public order and to reduce risk of damage to property and the lives of the commuters, due to the public assembly.
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Corporate law Master Case Study
26). Nowhere is there an intention indicated, tacit or explicit to involve in the corporation people who are not related to them by blood. Instead, we can read from the minds of the spouses Paul and Mary, the intention to maintain control of the corporation by family-related stockholders to the first degree of consanguinity.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
BUSINESS LAW Master Case Study
On the 15th of November,2008, the partnership agreed with John, the manager of Inky Town F.C. to manufacture 5000 bottles of premium lager commemorating the club's 100 years in the football league. Under the terms of the contract Supercool would provide a large glass show case for six months, which would be both stocked and maintained by employees of Supercool in Inky's bar located at the football ground.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Law Master Case Study for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us