The United Kingdom has several important libel laws: defamation act is nevertheless the most important one. However does English libel legislation has Sullivan defense Whether there is any provision that resembles Sullivan method! In order to answer this question one should recall the main features of Sullivan defense, and recall this case in order to understand the meaning of the Sullivan defense.
Sullivan a policeman from Montgomery, Alabama, sued New York Times for alleged untrue facts about him in the ad of New York Times. Alleged false information consisted of several minor inaccurate details about the protests at Alabama State College. Most of them were of minor character (for instance the names of songs were confused or some other minor facts were stated).
Supreme Court found that newspaper really misrepresented some facts, yet it nevertheless held that public official who sued for the damages must prove first of all, that untrue information was intentionally presented as such or that no attempt was actually made to find out whether this information was false or untrue and thus gross neglect to the verification of the truth occurred. However, in the opinion of the Court no such intentions were evident in the actions of New York Times, and thus the case of the Sullivan collapsed. 1
However, is Sullivan defense present in current libel laws of the United Kingdom In order to answer this question one has to study the law that regulates libel and defamatory. Let us consider the most important features of UK libel law.
First of all, one should distinguish between slander and libel. ...
Libel is the statement in print; whereas slander is statement in spoken form (however statement made by radio and TV broadcasters or by some performers can be regarded as libel as well). Libel can b presented in any form, it can be written on bulletin boards, websites and emails 2. As far as the broadcasting is concerned, defamatory statements are regulated by Broadcasting Act of 1990 3, and this act protects broadcasters especially if they make true, honest statements without malice. However, the broadcasting is a unique type of media, as the sound as well as visual materials is transmitted, and a broadcaster might wrongfully point out, or give the impression that they target some persons or companies. As the result of it some people may believe that they were especially targeted and singled out whereas they were not
Also some allegations in defamation can be made when particular text can be on top of some pictures that might induce persons to make some conclusions about particular person or event.
2 Libel, < http://www.media-solicitors.co.uk/libel_Section.htm>
3 Broadcast < http://www.media-solicitors.co.uk/Broadcast_Section.htm>
The same pertains to the radio that can mix music with particular text and thus can give particular impression about the event or another person. 4
If the statements induce person to evince hatred toward particular individual, might entail isolation of the person mentioned (the person can be avoided by some group of people as the result of the libel), damage his reputation and entail some financial difficulties or losses either for business or some groups of people, then the statements can be denoted as defamatory ones5.
However, if the statements might induce people to hate or consider with contempt Royal family, Government, ...
Cite this document
(“Media Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/law/291636-media-law
(Media Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
“Media Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/law/291636-media-law.
The author was a journalist who wrote a book entitled "Bent Coppers: The Inside Story of Scotland Yard's Battle Against Police Corruption" which was published by the publisher Orion Publishing Group Ltd. The author had been an officer in the Metropolitan police until his resignation upon a finding of an internal disciplinary panel.
Furthermore, the same article stated it was up to the judge to decide whether to exclude evidence in a criminal case in that it would be unfair to the accused(1). So the general view is that evidence obtained illegally was justifiable as long as it did not interfere with the accused rendering the trial unfair.
This paper reviews the principles that have to be considered when conducting an investigation. In addition, this paper will explore the need to conform to those principles and what consequences might flow from any failure to follow these principles.
As labor law and judges have become more stringent in reviewing cases, they have also become more biased in favor of the employee in cases where there is any doubt of the case presented by the employer.
1). The same Act also provides that "every person who shall monopolize, or combine, or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among several states, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony  (codified in 15 U.S.C., sec.
Jenny McSwindle has to use Mr. Finbar's children songs and got the publicity requires for more of the songs. Due to some loss in finance Ms. Jenny McSwindle cancels the order but it was a bit late as Mr. Finbar had already sent the songs. In the forth writing it is all about the Irish law.
The plaintiff, GM Studios had also sued Grokster Ltd, Stream Cast and a number of other peer-to-peer file-sharing companies to shut down their peer to peer file sharing activities. The case finally went to the Supreme Court to decide whether MGM and other copyright owners could sue these companies where it was held that they had the power to sue these companies and halt their activities.
The courts must consider which principles should be applied to the circumstances suffered by Davies & Jones against Sporting Sunday and whether they are appropriate to be invoked in acquiring an interim injunction.
The claimants can obtain an injunction by stating that Sporting Sunday has breached the law of confidence by its disclosure of private information, an act, which according to Lord Nicholls,1 constitutes an 'invasion of privacy.' In granting an injunction, the judges have to consider whether the claim is reasonable or subject to the restrictions of the law.
Three people were later on pronounced dead from the incident. Investigation into the bombings commenced immediately with investigators closely examining the footage captured in the surveillance cameras. Two
Bantz mailed the altered photograph, depicting Kiesau’s breasts, to several recipients. After first ruling in Kiesau’s favor, she mentioned alleged negligence by Buchanan county and Leonard Davis, the sheriff,