There are some cases that will be identified and included in this research to fully discuss the true meaning in behind what is considered legally and illegally permissible in medical cases where the patient is terminally ill. Also an emphasis is given as to when medical treatment can be legally withdrawn due to the futility of the medical illness. In the conclusion this research points out that although there are legal restraints preventing doctors to engage in treatments that result in the patients' life being taken, there are numerous ethical considerations that have to be taken into account as well. Within cases like these, nothing is ever easy, especially when it involves someone who is terminally ill and has no hope of survival.
Euthanasia has been in heated debate for a good while now within the UK. However, there have been numerous changes taking place within it's concept but one must ask do these changes go along with the old idea that insinuates any doctors or family members who engage in treatment regimens that are ultimately meant for ending the patients life should still be held legally liable in a court of law and from there face criminal charges from prosecution
Unfortunately, within the UK there are still legal grounds that are enforced in regards to anyone who ends another's life regardless of whether it was for a medical reason or whether the individual wanted assistance in ending their life period. It is not legally permissible or ethical to carry out medical cases such as these but it is being done anyway. However, those who want to die will search for any means possible such as with cases where patients have traveled to Switzerland to have doctors there perform assisted suicides or euthanasia procedures because it is legal in that country (Spinney 2005). The point is that no one wants to have to suffer unbearable and excruciating agony with an illness that has no hope of a cure or adequate treatment program available. In this regard the UK needs to realize that its citizens deserve to have the right to die in a dignified fashion when they deem it is appropriate, not when the government states it is logical. In this case there is no fallible reason found in the statement that medical treatment should be legally impermissible if it is being carried out in correlation with the patients' right to die.
One specific case that gives emphases on how patients are considering the country of Switzerland as an option for allowing them to have the right to decide when to end their life is in regards to Alayne Buckley and her disease of amyotrophic sclerosis (Spinney 2005). There is no cure for this disease and it results in severe pain throughout the body for the patient. Mrs. Buckley feels that hers is a medical necessity because in her case there is no way to ease her pain and prevent her loved ones from having to suffer through such a horrific illness alongside of her if she remains in the UK. This case refutes the fact that Euthanasia should be