human right act 1998

High school
Case Study
Law
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Download 0
-1 The situation that Heather and Len are in is not an unusual one, as retirement homes are notorious for their human rights violations against the elderly. At various times throughout history, however, they have gotten away with these violations if they were a private sector company that was providing a public service…

Introduction

This is a violation of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act of 1998. Secondly, this is in violation of Article 2, as Heather and Len are not being given medical attention without their lives being at risk, which they feel will happen if they are apart. Finally, this could be viewed as a violation of Article 3, as they are being degraded by not being able to live their lives in the manner that they wish. Married couples should be permitted to live together and these circumstances are preventing this from occurring. Heather and Len should receive immediate legal help in order to address this situation. They must be taught exactly what their rights are because people tend to take advantage of those who are not sure exactly what their own rights are. Heather and Len have every right to pursue the life that they desire and should use the Human Rights Act to do so.
Figuring out action that can be taken against Helpful Borough Council is a complicated process, especially given the age and the situation of Len and Heather. In previous times, the Human Rights Act did not expand into private companies that provide a public service, which meant that retirement homes were essentially exempt from these laws. That has changed recently, however, as the elderly have been given more rights with which to fight back. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

"The Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake". Discuss.
Thus, HRA has altered the style in which the UK courts would approach the domestic legislation. Further, the opponents of the HRA vociferously argue that since the rights violation is already covered under the common law, there is no need to legislate separate law namely HRA. The critics argue that the Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake." This essay will discuss why there is a need…
Human Rights Act 1998
However, the Government also declared that there was no intention to provide a basis for striking down any portion of it. Nevertheless, the judiciary has been empowered to rescind secondary legislation that does not comply with the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights.2 Exceptions to this principle arise when the parent statute does not permit such repealing. Legislation has to be…
Ombudsman and Human Rights Act 1998
The Human Rights Act 1998 came into force on October 2000 band made it far easier to enforce the European Convention on Human Rights in British courts. It has been observed that the HRA is one of the most revolutionary pieces of legislation to be passed in the UK, to rank alongside the Bill of Rights, the Acts of Union and the European Communities Act 1972. Before this Act, in the late…
human right act 1998
This is a violation of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act of 1998. Secondly, this is in violation of Article 2, as Heather and Len are not being given medical attention without their lives being at risk, which they feel will happen if they are apart. Finally, this could be viewed as a violation of Article 3, as they are being degraded by not being able to live their lives in the manner that they…
Human Rights Act 1998 6(3)(b)
This pigeonholing of information meant for the common people of a democratic country only serve to increase ambiguity about the nature and extent of their existence and most importantly the essential function they possess to help the citizen of the state. Statutory interpretation of Section 6 of the Act makes the understanding of two types of "public authority" seemingly quite clear-cut within the…
Functions of a public nature under a provision of the Human Rights Act of 1998
Those courts or judicial bodies shall act accordingly when an individual applies for that relief or remedy. Thus, if one perceives that any government authority exercises its powers illegally, he (the aggrieved party) may file or apply to the Administrative Court for judicial review. This means that the petitioner or applicant will be asking the Administrative Court to quash or set aside the…
Human Rights Act 1998
Who will then protect the ordinary citizen from suffering from the wrath of the angry Queen of Hearts (the executive) and give them a chance to have their cases reconsidered and to achieve procedural and substantive justice…