Criminal Law - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Criminal Law

Intention leads the guilty party to have prior foresight of consequences that will take place should the act be carried out.
It is different from recklessness since on a subjective basis, there remains foresight without the hope of actually bringing about results. The problem in the courts of law is that the borderline between intention and recklessness is too vague. The court has to decide the extent of the desire to carry out the act and convert recklessness into intention. In DPP v Smith (1961) AC 290, the test was that the individual was taken to foresee and intend to bring about the likeliest actions if he carried out his intentions.
One, 'subjective' recklessness; In this case the defendant understands that a risk may occur if a certain action is carried out, still despite knowing this he still chooses to take that action ignoring the results of his actions. This is often seen when the guilty party decides to drive under the influence knowing full well that his actions could cause an accident.
Two, 'objective' recklessness arises when it is apparent to everyone apart from the defendant that there was a risk. Therefore the risk is so apparent that despite the defendant claims not to have considered the risk this is irrelevant.
Intention has many different levels at the most serious intention can lead to murder. ...
Download paper


To make a charge stay currently requires to find the party guilty of recklessness or intent. Currently intention is a central requirement of criminal law since prosecution requires the party to be found guilty of intent. If the party is found not to be guilty of intent a serious crime could be committed and the guilty party could walk away without punishment…
Author : nmills

Related Essays

Law Essay - Criminal Law
Therefore in respect of the facts at hand unless a case beyond reasonable is made in respect of John he would be deemed to be innocent. (Woolmington v. DPP)1 (Oremond et al, 2011) On the basis of the above discussion it is important to bear in mind that criminal liability would accrue if the offence is proved beyond reasonable doubt and the burden of proof vests with the prosecution. An important principle that is also laid down is that the actus reus and mens rea of the offence must coincide, however the courts have adopted a broad approach in respect of the same. (Clarkson et al, 2010) In...
9 pages (2259 words) Essay
Criminal Legal Principle
The legal principle regulating criminal liability for omissions consists of special duty, contractual duty and dangerous situations. In English Law the legal principle for omission rests upon these three principles, and the omission on the part of the individual to act upon any one of these attracts a criminal liability. The set of principles regulating criminal are extremely rigid and have not ben explained properly in the ambit of English Law. One of the most crucial cases governing this principle is R v. Miller (1982) UKHL 6. This case outlines the legal jurisprudence behind the act of...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
The liability of secondary parties in homicide in the UK
This research paper explores the liability of secondary parties in homicide in the UK as per common law and as per the existing criminal laws in UK.The operation of Western Legal Systems shows that the Criminal Law exhibits two separate paradigms of responsibility. One, where individual justice is paramount. Much devotion in this research paper will be given to the standard that is to be perused at common law for foresight of outcomes at common law where homicide has happened due to joint criminal enterprises and the involvement of a secondary party in such offences. This research paper will...
21 pages (5271 words) Essay
Criminal Law Master Essay
Jurors influencing others could damage the fabric of justice defeating the very purpose of majority verdict. The veil of secrecy sometimes is very thinly maintained. The popular belief that jurors represent all sections of society need not be right at all times.
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
Criminal Law
This paper will present issues related to which crimes terrorists can be charged with, how defendants who commit crimes in other countries can be charged in the United States, and how we can prevent terrorism both inside and outside the United States. The agencies of the federal government define terrorism in several different ways. This lack of consistency may raise difficult legal questions when the government starts investigating and processing terrorist suspects under different legal procedures than it applies to other The Justice Department’s Executive Office for United States Attorneys...
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Problem essay - law - criminal law
To understand and assess the question, it is necessary to know about the doctrine of common purpose or joint enterprise where two or more people embark on a project with a common purpose that results in the commission of a crime. However, Australian law takes a similar approach to English law with respect to the mens rea requirement for complicity.
8 pages (2008 words) Case Study
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!