Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Comparative Company Law - Case Study Example

Author : emueller
Download 1

Summary

One of the most important principles of the European Union (EU) is to establish a common market amongst member States as it enables EU to compete globally with other giant economies, such as that of US. A single market can be achieved only by allowing freedom of movement of people, services and goods…

Extract of sample
Comparative Company Law

Following that we will look at relevant case law to see where ECJ standing is in this issue.
Article 48 states: "'Companies or firms formed in accordance with the law of a Member State and having their registered office, central administration or principal place of business within the Community shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, be treated in the same way as natural persons who are nationals of Member States.'
The treaty clearly states that a legal person, such as a company or firm, must be treated in the same way as a natural person, therefore a company must be able to move between member states without any restrictions. Saying that, it should be pointed out that the case of a company is more complicated, as unlike a natural person a company can stand at two different places simultaneously. Matters complicate even further when we consider that a company should be formed in accordance with the law of a Member State. Across Europe recognition of companies differs from Member State to Member State. Broadly speaking Member States take two approaches at recognising a company as having a valid legal personality. Most of them follow the real seat theory, others follow the incorporation theory.
A country which follows the incorporation theory, such as United Kingdom, recognises a company as a legal personality providing it is incorporated in any of the Member States. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

The Corporate Veil in the UK and US
The paper tells that corporate Governance principles have a big effect on the aspect of the corporate veil. The company structure which separates the power contained by directors in their managing roles and the ownership in the hands of the shareholders has caused problems as to how the corporate veil can affect corporate governance. How can directors be made properly accountable to the shareholders, and does this improve corporate governance? Davies terms this as “the quest for stockholder democracy”, and says the apparent simple solution of improving levels of democracy and increasing…
15 pages (3765 words)
The Company Act 2006: Promoting Corporate Governance and Protecting Minority Shareholders
The intention of this study is the UK Company Act of 2006. Its major purposes are to protect shareholder rights, to ensure directors’ responsibility, to promote corporate governance – all of which will, in the end, facilitate a better policy environment for commerce and trade. The Companies Act – previously known as the Company Law Reform Bill - received its second reading in the House of Lords on January 11, 2006, and received Royal Assent on November 8, 2006. As stated by Lord Sainsbury, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at DTI, the purpose of the Act is to “to constantly update…
10 pages (2510 words)
company law, study case
1 Thus, in Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation the disputed transaction was not held to be void. The court came to this decision as the transaction was not wholly beyond the capacity of the company.2 The directors of a private company with just one class of shares are permitted to allot the same class of shares. In addition, they can convert securities into such shares. 3 Moreover, such directors can grant rights to subscribe to such shares. However, these share allotment activities are subject to the prohibitions of the Companies Act 2006. 4 In all other…
19 pages (4769 words)
A New Legislative Structure for Company Law in UK
Both the section 31 and 39 of the CA 2006 of UK chiefly diminish the applicability of the doctrine of ultra vires to the company law, especially in the United Kingdom. However, the doctrine of ultra vires is still applicable to Charity Companies in UK. Thus, an injunction can be applied by a member of a Charity Company, in advance only, to hamper an act which is supposed to be ultra vires1. The acts that were ultra vires the competence of the company, and that could not be approved by seeking its member’s approval were first time differentiated by an English court in 1875. The phrase…
10 pages (2510 words)
Company Law
This manifest prominently amid the utilization of any assets, opportunity, or information and fails to link to a clash of interest flowing from a transaction or pact with the company or in the events in which the subject has been permitted by the company’s directors (Davies 2012, p.8). Highlighting conflict of interest impacting on the director demands exploring whether the director engaged will obtain a substantial gain from the manifest conflict of interest. Background The decision that the directors’ duties should be codified was accompanied by the debate centring on the “stakeholder…
8 pages (2008 words)
Company Law
However, under certain circumstances, it has been identified that courts may disregard this principle. Correspondingly, corporate veil is a legal notion that separates the characteristics of a business from that of the characteristics of its shareholders, which further defends the shareholder from becoming liable for the debts and other legal obligations associated with the company. It simply signifies that the creditors of the company cannot claim personal assets of the owner; instead, they could claim only for the assets related to the entity2. In this regard, lifting the corporate veil is…
12 pages (3012 words)
Company Law
Scholars denote that because a business organization is incorporated, then the assets of these people are protected from seizures by creditors of the company. That is, the owners of the business under consideration are not liable for the liabilities of the company2.…
8 pages (2008 words)