Please boost your Plan to download papers
Case Study sample - Comparative Company Law
Pages 10 (2510 words)
One of the most important principles of the European Union (EU) is to establish a common market amongst member States as it enables EU to compete globally with other giant economies, such as that of US. A single market can be achieved only by allowing freedom of movement of people, services and goods…
Following that we will look at relevant case law to see where ECJ standing is in this issue.
Article 48 states: "'Companies or firms formed in accordance with the law of a Member State and having their registered office, central administration or principal place of business within the Community shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, be treated in the same way as natural persons who are nationals of Member States.'
The treaty clearly states that a legal person, such as a company or firm, must be treated in the same way as a natural person, therefore a company must be able to move between member states without any restrictions. Saying that, it should be pointed out that the case of a company is more complicated, as unlike a natural person a company can stand at two different places simultaneously. Matters complicate even further when we consider that a company should be formed in accordance with the law of a Member State. Across Europe recognition of companies differs from Member State to Member State. Broadly speaking Member States take two approaches at recognising a company as having a valid legal personality. Most of them follow the real seat theory, others follow the incorporation theory.
A country which follows the incorporation theory, such as United Kingdom, recognises a company as a legal personality providing it is incorporated in any of the Member States. ...
Not exactly what