StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Doctrine of Mistake in Common Law - Case Study Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Doctrine of Mistake in Common Law

In some other cases even when the contract is valid in law, it may be rendered voidable in equity on the ground of mistake.
The general thinking used to be that mistakes could not be operative in law until in case of Kleinwort Benson v Liverpool City Council3 when the House of Lords declared that this rule is not part of English law. Treitel4 has considered the laws relating to mistake under five headings: Common Mistake; Mutual Mistake; Unilateral Mistake; Mistake as to Identity; Mistake Relating to Documents.
While commentators are not agreed as to the classifications of Mistake, Treitel5 in his book; The Laws of contract, 11th edition, deals with Mistake by contrasting Mistake nullifying consent (Parties reach agreement which is based on a fundamental mistaken assumption) with Mistake negativing consent (Where mistake prevents the parties from reaching an agreement e.g. where they intend to contract about different things).
Some commentators have gone on to divide mistake into two parts, that is, common mistake shared by the parties, and mistake in communication. In a common mistake shared by both parties, although both parties apparently in agreement, have entered into the contract on the basis of a false and fundamental assumption. It is called common mistake since both parties make the same mistake. The contract is not necessarily void at law in these circumstances.
In the case In the case of Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd.6, definition of common mistake in contract law was made. During March of 1929 the Niger Company, which dealt in trade in the western African area, was merging with a rival company and wanted to get rid of two employees Mr. Bell and Mr. Snelling, who were hired as chairman and vice-chairman of the company. Chairman D'Arcy Cooper on behalf of Lever Brothers7 made a deal with Bell and Snelling to leave the company in exchange for a sizable compensation (a "Golden handshake8"). At the time of the agreement both parties believed that the employment contract had not been breached and thus the company would not have been able to terminate Bell and Snellings' employment under any other circumstances. It was later revealed that there was in fact grounds for termination at the time of the agreement as Bell and Snelling had used their positions to make a secret profit for themselves.
Lever brought an action claiming recission of the compensation agreement because of mistake of fact.
At trial the jury found that Bell and Snelling's illicit dealings breached the employment contract and that if the Lever Brothers had known they would not have entered into the agreement. Furthermore, the jury found that at the time of the agreement Bell and Snelling did not have in mind their illicit acts.
Lever Brothers pursued the case vigorously as it considered the behavior of Bell and Snelling simply unacceptable. To appreciate this legal battle you have to understand the background of the personalities involved. Francis D'Arcy Cooper - a senior partner with his uncle's accountancy firm Cooper Brothers and staunch Quaker9 - became chairman of audit client Lever Brothers in the early 1920s. He was hired by Lord Leverhulme10 when the banks were threatening to call the loans on the company due to devastating losses incurred by the newly acquired Niger Company that crippled Lever Brothers. Cooper arranged financing from Barclays Bank under the ...Show more

Summary

This piece is looking at the doctrine of mistake in common law and support Ewan McKendrick 's position that the Great Peace Shipping v Tsavliris Salvage Ltd1 case has reduced the doctrine of mistake to a vanishing point.
Caveat emptor ("let the buyer beware") is the basic underlying principle in the law of contract…
Author : stantonwilson
Doctrine of Mistake in Common Law essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
"Doctrine of Mistake in Common Law"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Unconscionability doctrine in contract law
Unconscionability doctrine in contract law Unconscionability doctrine in contract law, allows a court not to accept or enforce a contract whose terms seem to favor one party. The contract is seen to be unfair and exploitative to the party who ha not understood the terms of the agreement that have been put in the contract: it protects against duress and fraud.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Contract law
The parties should be able to rescind the contract under mediated caution. Rescission of a contract, based on mutual mistake, involves both legal and ethical considerations that should be made in justifying it. A legal approach to the issues identifies termination of a contract under mutual mistake because this makes a contract void per se.
3 pages (750 words) Case Study
The common law and equity
Equity is uniquely conscience based and is a discretionary regime which has its own set of principles .Sometimes it can be more powerful than common law rights, because when common law fails to provide adequate remedy, equity may come into force to provide remedy.
14 pages (3500 words) Case Study
The Main Aspects of Criminal Law
The mens rea which will suffice is the intention or subjective recklessness. Intention can be categorized into direct intent or oblique intent. Direct intent will be present if it is found that the act caused was the purpose of the actor. Oblique intent on the other hand is where the jury may find the result intended even if it was no the actor's purpose, this is found if the jury finds that i) the result is virtually certain consequence of his act; and ii) he knows that it is a virtually certain consequence (R v.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Different Aspects of Evidence Law
But these facts may make the court reluctant to the complainant's denial or consent in the instant case.2 Consent has to be freely obtained not by force or by means of threat or intimidation or fear of harm. Consent given because of exhaustion after persistent struggle and resistance would appear to be no consent.
9 pages (2250 words) Case Study
Contract law mistake essay
It will compare the decision of the court in Bell v Lever Bros. Ltd [1932] AC 161 as against that in Solle v Butcher [1950] 1 KB 671. By looking closely at the commonalities of the 2 cases, what becomes apparent will be the ramifications of its reconciliation in the Great Peace case.
9 pages (2250 words) Case Study
Agency,innkeepers doctrine,and liquor licensing law
If a principal is disclosed and named, and the agent acts out outside its actual or apparent authority, then only the agent is liable to the third party. Hence, Worf cannot enforce the contract against Picard.(b) No, the answer would still be the same even if the agent had not informed the third party of the name of the principal because the agent acted outside its actual authority and against the instructions of the unnamed principal.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Contract Law Degree Case Study
Rupert has completed the work to the full satisfaction of Herbert and he has evidently accepted the fact too. But he paid Rupert only 25% less of the cost of the listed items as interim payments instead of 10% less. There arises a breach of contract on the part of Herbert since he did not pay as he had agreed to at the beginning of the contract.
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Contract law, Doctrine of consideration
It seems highly probable that when the courts first used the word "consideration" they meant no more than there was a "reason" for the enforcement of a promise. If the consideration was "good", this meant that the court found sufficient reason for enforcing the promise.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Common law and economics
Civil law is open to flexibility. This is because changing scenarios necessitate the dynamism in laws to address contemporary issues. This is unlike common law whose facts do not change as decisions are made from a distinct basis. Besides, in a common law proceeding, a trial is usually a unique hearing lasting for a comparatively short period.
1 pages (250 words) Case Study
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation