StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Jurisprudence - Case Study Example

Nobody downloaded yet
For philosophers like Plato there is a very close connection between law and morality as true justice is indispensable to human well-being. The field of ethics has often criticised legal arrangements and how the mechanical application of law provokes ethical and moral injustice.1 The discussion that follows will centre around and discuss the above mentioned conflicting themes in this area.
Firstly it has to be seen whether the existence of unjust laws shows that law and morality are a gulf apart. Secondly whether the existence of laws that serve to defend basic fundamental rights like laws against murder, rape and defamation are a testimony to the compatibility of law and morality. Thirdly that the law only identifies offences and prescribes punishments for crimes and does not take into account the motives and morality behind a defendants actions no matter how noble they are. The fourth theme which is going to be tested in this regard is the internal or habit like nature of morality as opposed to law, as it is said to govern law without compulsion or fear of punishment. Fifthly whether morality can form the basis of making several laws illegal because they are immoral, no matter how procedurally valid they may seem. Last but not the least this essay explores whether the law can be a public expression of morality enshrining the basic principles of acceptable conduct with in a society.2

The statement in the question above comes from the very controversial case of Re A 3 (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation) where the parents of six week old Siamese twins, Mary and Jody,(M and J) appealed against a court order granting the NHS the authority to perform an optional surgical separation .The twin M had severe brain abnormalities, no lung tissue and no properly functioning heart and depended for her blood supply upon J which was her healthy ,normally functioning conjoined twin.4 It was held at first instance that the operation would serve the interests of both the twins by offering J a chance of a normal life and giving M the opportunity to avoid the last few painful months of her life.5 The parents of the conjoined twins appealed and their appeal was dismissed on the basis that ,respect for the wishes of the parents notwithstanding the court was obliged to determine the issue on the basis of the welfare of the children.6It was how
The appellate court concluded that the operation was in the interests of one child, and that a balancing exercise would be required to find a way in between for both the children's interests.7 The justification the court gave for this surgery not being a murder was that it satisfied the parameters of the doctrine of necessity i.e. that
The act was required to avoid inevitable and irreparable evil;
It required no more than would be reasonably necessary to achieve the end8
The evil to be inflicted was not disproportionate to the evil avoided9.
The case is a classic example of the Dworkinian notion of hard cases making bad law which will be subsequently discussed. In this tragic case all three Appeal Court judges accepted that J's interests should prevail over M's
However Ward L.J and his companion judges seemed to accept the inevitable dilemma that they had to face in refusing the appeal and ...Show more


This question requires the discussion of the historical and judicial tussle between law and morality which goes right back to the Roman times with ancient writings suggesting that the law givers and the judges of a society should determine what is right and wrong…
Author : gradyprosacco
Jurisprudence essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Knowledge in the Natural Law
"'Prudentia,' meaning "knowledge" in Latin, translates directly to English as "prudence." The native English word is "wisdom," which also originally meant "knowledge." In either case, one behaves prudently or wisely because one has knowledge of the possible consequences of a particular action",
5 pages (1250 words) Case Study
The Republic of Zakville (Jurisprudence)
Every country possesses and adheres to its own rules of law when punishing offenders. In many cases, appropriate punishment is dealt for the severity of the crime committed. The more brutal the crime, the harsher the punishment. But there are nations that impose extreme retribution for even minor misdemeanors, China being a case in point.
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Immigration and Asylum Law
Nationality is a relationship between a person and their state of origin, culture, association, affiliation and/or loyalty. The law of nationality is related to two terms jus soli and jus sanguinis i.e nationality is established at birth by a child's place of birth or bloodline.
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Trust in a law
Without any monetary consideration from Bill. This was done without the intention of any beneficial ownership to Bill. 1 ch. 269 it suggests that it is not correct to talk in terms of equitable title remaining with the settlor.3 However quoting Mergarry J, he distinguished that there are two major categories of resulting trust which can be distinguished between automatic and presumed resulting trust , as follows to wit:
8 pages (2000 words) Case Study
Medical Malpractice
Liese before the statutory deadline, we affirm.1 Description: Is it reversible error to permit a jury to decide a case based on an instruction that is neither supported by the evidence, intended by the trial court, nor
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Business law case
Any delays or interruptions in their relationship caused by litigation could have a devastating impact on both parties regardless of which party is ultimately vindicated in the courts. Acme would find itself without essential parts that are hard to source
2 pages (500 words) Case Study
United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897
In a manner of saying, this jurisprudence promulgated an exception to the exception, which deliberately pertains to the essence of the fourth amendment. This decision has created a difference of opinion, on the one hand providing for
1 pages (250 words) Case Study
Read the attached case and write a legal brief of the case
However, officials installed the device on the 11th day when the vehicle was in Maryland. Using this, the agents tracked the respondent for 28 days and obtained a multiple-count indictment charging the respondent Jones with conspiracy to distribute and possess drugs. On
1 pages (250 words) Case Study
Interprofessional Network
In such circumstances the judge is capable to base decisions not only on the immediate issues at hand but also with a perception toward seeking more permanent solutions for the family’s future. The underlying professionals that build an
3 pages (750 words) Case Study
Brief Memo
the case, the court was deemed appropriate, in its function of regulating the fees paid to investment advisers; especially those within the mutual fund sector, as regulated in the aforementioned Act. In context, the investors viewed the fees as being not only excessive, but also
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Hire a pro to write
a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Jurisprudence for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
  • About StudentShare

  • Testimonials

  • FAQ

  • Blog

  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays

  • The Newest Essay Topics
Join us:
Contact Us