Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Jurisprudence - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : gradyprosacco


This question requires the discussion of the historical and judicial tussle between law and morality which goes right back to the Roman times with ancient writings suggesting that the law givers and the judges of a society should determine what is right and wrong…

Extract of sample

For philosophers like Plato there is a very close connection between law and morality as true justice is indispensable to human well-being. The field of ethics has often criticised legal arrangements and how the mechanical application of law provokes ethical and moral injustice.1 The discussion that follows will centre around and discuss the above mentioned conflicting themes in this area.
Firstly it has to be seen whether the existence of unjust laws shows that law and morality are a gulf apart. Secondly whether the existence of laws that serve to defend basic fundamental rights like laws against murder, rape and defamation are a testimony to the compatibility of law and morality. Thirdly that the law only identifies offences and prescribes punishments for crimes and does not take into account the motives and morality behind a defendants actions no matter how noble they are. The fourth theme which is going to be tested in this regard is the internal or habit like nature of morality as opposed to law, as it is said to govern law without compulsion or fear of punishment. Fifthly whether morality can form the basis of making several laws illegal because they are immoral, no matter how procedurally valid they may seem. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Keeping in view the most fundamental of the human desires, statutes of prevailing law offer unflinching liberty to the individuals provided the freedom does not challenge the rights of others in such a manner that could place afflictions and tribulations to others. It is therefore national and international laws introduced by the states as well as the UN Charter of human rights vehemently look for the allowing freedom to the people without discrimination.
12 pages (3012 words)
Jurisprudence - Liberal Feminism
Just as feminism, feminist jurisprudence cannot be explained by any single theory4. It is a family of different frameworks or view-points that are used in the analysis of the desirable or real relationship between gender and law5. In her view, Christine Littleton considers feminist jurisprudence as a collection of various attempts aimed at critiquing, changing and explicating the law for the sake of, and from women’s point of view6. Christine Littleton argues that, feminist jurisprudence aims at explaining women’s experiences and at the same time transforming the law. Despite the fact that…
14 pages (3514 words)
Jurisprudence Law Essay
The law should be generally found on the established legislative pronouncement. The task of lawyers and judges thus is to apply positive law. They need not concern themselves with the question of whether law is just or unjust. The law is thus what the court says it is and statutes such as usages and customs are not the foundation of law. Lawyers and judges put life into the dead words of the laws. Their articulated intentions and feelings should not be ignored. There should be separation of legal validity matters from morality questions because what the law should be does not have anything to…
6 pages (1506 words)
Jurisprudence Assignment Question
Antigone decided to defy the proclamation that her brother not be buried properly, and gave him a burial against the state's wishes. After this she was imprisoned and hanged herself in her prison (Sophocles). Natural Law According to Stoner (1992),1 the story of Antigone is one in which the individual is entitled to break the law. He cites Thomas Hobbes as distinguishing between right and law (ius and lex) – right being the basis for liberty and law being the basis for obligation.
10 pages (2510 words)
Secondly, the new government appoints new judges to the Albaland Supreme Court in accordance with a new constitutional requirement that there be a gender balance of 50:50 among the judges and always a gay judge in any case ‘where interests of the gay community were relevant’. The minority of dissenting judges resigned, with many using language such as ‘against natural law’. This only shows that the judges feel the requirement is unjust/illegitimate and been imposed on them (the judicial officers).
5 pages (1255 words)
Jurisprudence (Ethics and Morality)
Kautilya2 an ancient Indian scholar who's Arthasastra is famous for its depiction of instructions and advices to a king clearly required the state to provide for the maintenance of childless women. In his view moral considerations were not to occupy the politics, which should simply concentrate on victory only. The magnum opus Arthasastra fulfils the requirements of twentieth century international law for the recognition of a state. In ancient Rome, pontiffs and their sons were alone empowered to deliver judgements. Only in third century BC some eminent groups like Proculians and Sabinians…
8 pages (2008 words)
ral law perspective, laws are intended to enforce moral codes.2 Thus if, the lawyers and judges are required to apply and interpret natural law, it would be up to them to determine that which is just or unjust. The main question is therefore whether or not lawyers and judges are required to apply and interpret positive or natural law.…
8 pages (2008 words)