Manchesters Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership - Essay Example

The objective of this paper is to assess the Manchester's CDRP 2005-2008 Strategy through mapping its objectives and current outcomes. This will require the study of the program's rationale, objectives, methods and results. In the course of this study, the research will be able to develop insights regarding the prevalence of crime in the area, its impact to the community and determine future needs regarding the issue. At the end of this assessment, the research will demonstrate understanding and knowledge of criminality in Manchester, provide analysis of the Manchester's 2005-2008 CDRP Strategy and evaluate the significance of "culture of control" to crime and related activities in the area.

The significance of the role of society in criminal control has grown in significance in criminal justice systems due to its inclusion in the prevailing management programs for the concern. This view is supported by Garland (2001, pp. 44-48) in his emphasis of the correlation of social order and crime in contemporary societies. He sees in particular the growing directness of the relationship between control and crime which he characterizes as a "culture of control". . Albert Bandura's (1975, pp.

57-59; 111-117) studies, considered as foundations of modern criminal behaviors studies, highlight the importance of the interactions of individuals and their respective environments. The suggestion is that as one's personality develops, his social experience creates the conditions for behavioral tendencies (Weisner et al, 2003, p. 321). As such, the Crime and Disorder Act has emphasized its perspective that the prevalence of crime or any disorderly behaviors can be then considered as a product of the individual personality traits and one's social experience.

In the same manner, the Act has also recognized that deterring crime is dependent on the level of reinforcement socially learned behaviors are in an individual. In a study of juvenile crime behavior, researchers suggested that the focus on control rather than prevention deters the effectiveness of programs directed towards crime (Tarolla et al, 2002, pp. 17-18). Efforts are limited as management measures, reactive rather than responsive to crime issues. This leaves the issue of prevention at a disadvantage, a state which does not deter the impact of crime to society and contributes little to actual reduction of crime (Weisner et al, 2003, pp. 322-323). Management of interventions is then developed from the identification and matching of competencies of the offices involved in the program.

Governance is done collectively subscribing to the requirements of Crime &Disorder Act provisions but also in recognition of the need to develop collective insights to crime issues and trends. To be able to create develop insights to crime control strategies there is a need to consider the