StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Land Law - Case Study Example

Nobody downloaded yet

Extract of sample
Land Law

In this case study, the facts to be observed is with regard to provisions of Land Registration 2002 which was operationalised from 2003. Section 29 (1) of the Land Registration Act 2002 states, interalia, "if a registrable disposition of a registered charge is made for valuable consideration, completion of the disposition by registration has the effect of postponing to the interest under the disposition any interest affecting the charge immediately before the disposition whose priority is not protected at the time of registration." (Disposition of Registered Land. 2002).
The aspects of restrictions, as is evident in this case study are found under Sections 40 and 41 of Land Registration Act 2002. Section 40 circumscribes the circumstances under which certain restrictions could be imposed with regard to mortgage and they seek to place restrictions on the making of any entries, either for a specified or unspecified period of time or depending upon the happening of any event. The law under Section 40 (2) states that "A restriction may, in particular
(3) Without prejudice to generality of subsection (2)(b)(iii), the events which may be specified include- (a) the giving of notice,(b) the obtaining of consent, and (c) the making of an order by the court or registrar. (Notices and restrictions. 2002).
In this case of Nicole and Silky Smooth Limited, it is seen that the following restrictions were placed by the mortgagee (lender) Silky Smooth Limited while negotiating a Registered 1st Charge on the property of Nicole, the mortgagor as pre-conditions for giving of the loans: 1. She would be the sole supplier for the Nicole's beauty product Company until year 2034. 2. There would be no repayment of the loan amount of 100,000 from the loanee, or demands from loaner for a period of 25 years. 3. The interest rate would be at 3% more than the prevailing bank rate.
The effect of these registered charges now binds both the mortgagee and the mortgagor as per Section 40 of the Registration of Property Act. The aspect of "restrictive covenant "that was seen in the case of Tulk v. Moxhay 1848 and it is said that this established that the burden of a covenant which was restrictive in nature could run with the land', despite privity of contract. (Tulk v Moxhay (1848). 2006).
The aspect of higher interest rate that is seen in this case study cannot be termed as unconscionable since as per the legal framework, there are no restrictions on the rate of interest that may be charged on mortgages, and in the absence of disagreement or protest on the party of the mortgagor regarding higher interest rates, there is a valid agreement.
(Are there limits on the interest rate that can be charged: (How to know your rights and obligations as mortgagee (lender) 2006).
Thus it could be seen that as per Section 40 of the Registration of Property Act, once the restrictions have been registered as charge, as is evident in this case, it should be enforceable on the parties and except, ...Show more

Summary

The facts of this case relates as to whether clauses restraining the behaviour of mortgagors, in terms of re-lease of the mortgaged property under restrictive clauses relating to time and mode of further lease could be enforceable under the provisions of the relevant laws, especially in the event of a collateral contract specifying the terms of re-leasing…
Author : zulaufsigmund
Land Law essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
"Land Law"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Propery Law
Mr. Anderson entrusted the purchase transaction to Alex Draper, a trainee solicitor with Biedale Solicitors. To help Laex, in the work, Mr. Anderson engaged also the services of the Rogers and Co.(Surveyors). Rogers Adrian did not report any problem after checking the Glebe House personally and recommended that the House is good for the price.
9 pages (2250 words) Case Study
Land Management
The review decision by the BLM engineer was administrative rulemaking. The BLM is not a court of law nor is it a legislative body; therefore, the decisions it makes that have legal weight are neither laws nor adjudications but only administrative rules. Furthermore, the decision was not based on any sort of litigious conflict.
1 pages (250 words) Case Study
Case Study on Land Law
Broadly speaking, any third party interests against registered land will either be deemed an overriding interest, or a minor interest. An overriding interest will be binding on the purchaser, whereas a minor interest will only be binding on purchasers if it is protected by an entry on the register.
10 pages (2500 words) Case Study
Property rights under land laws
The aspects of property law discussed in this case are the legal power or authority of easement, lease and rights of entry, as granted to Rajinder, Imran and Anita. An easement is a document which allows the neighbors or a neighbor to use the property. In this case a positive easement was granted to Rajinder by Zac and Julie, as Rajinder got the right to use the property owned to Zac, Julie.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Land Law Degree Case Study
At the same time, it is imperative to note that Paul had actually assumed full ownership of the entire property in question. In this Paul was the legitimate owner of the property then he passed over its ownership to Nitin and Miriam by virtue of sale. In this regard, as at October 2009, they became the landlords of this whole real estate property.
10 pages (2500 words) Case Study
Land Law (case study)
In legal parlance, a restrictive covenant is one in which the covenantee is restrained, or prohibited from performing a deed or action, mutually agreed upon, by covenant. Although restrictive covenants of the kind seen above between the original owner and the co-owner are valid under law, a question would arise whether similar restrictive covenant would be enforceable in the event of a new purchaser coming into the scene.
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Property Law Master Case Study
With the facts of the case given in the above cited case of Amy and Brian with regard to their purchased house in the name of Brian, hereto are the grounds for the claim of Amy in the aforesaid property to wit: Based on the decided case Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset1 of the House of Lords which re-affirmed the essential elements of the establishment of a constructive trust it stated that, "(1) That the parties must share a common intention to share the ownership of the land concerned which may be either expressed or implied from the conduct of the parties; (2) That the party claiming beneficial intention by way of a constructive trust must show proof that she significantly altered her position
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Land Law Case Study
Legal owners mean people who are named on the title documents and the number of them would not exceed four. "Where the property is registered in the public District Land Registry (as all properties bought on or after 3 December 1990 will be), the legal owners are the people listed as the "registered proprietors".
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Business Law - land law
Upon requesting Hill Bob to leave the land, Hill Bob stated that he had squatter's rights. "Adverse possession is the taking of title to real estate by possessing it for a certain period of time. Title means ownership of real estate. The person claiming title to real estate by adverse possession must have actual possession of it that is open, notorious, exclusive and adverse to the claims of other persons to the title.
3 pages (750 words) Case Study
Race and Law: Oyama v. California case
The sociopolitical atmosphere in which the verdicts were rendered is not maintained by the majority outlook of the case. The Alien Land Law was criticized on several fronts and ambiguities. Firstly, Fred Oyama, the father, was dispossessed of his civil liberties as
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Hire a pro to write
a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment