Trust Law Case Study

Masters
Case Study
Law
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
It is assumed that the will, by which the 950 shares have been bequeathed to the Accountant, Tom, to be held in trust for Ben's nephew, Andrew, is a written one, since, f Section 53 (1) (c) of the Law of Property Act 1925 categorically states that any verbal or non-written disposition of Equitable interest is void and unenforceable…

Introduction

2006).
In the Vandervill v. IRC (1967) 2 WLR 87 case, the main issue that arouse was the question of the demarcation of legal and equitable interests. The Provisions of Section 53 (1) (c) is possible only when the legal rights and the equitable interests have been suitably demarcated at the time of passing of the interest. However, the Courts held that since, Vandervill had bypassed this requirement, by first transferring the shares to himself and then to the ultimate beneficiaries, and thus, the requirement for invocation of this section does not arise. (The Statutory requirement for the creation of the Trust. 2001).
Although the law is dealing with the Property Act it also extends to other aspects of equitable interest. Under the Section 5 (1) of the Wills Act, 1988, " it is seen that every person may dispose by will, executed in accordance with this Act, of all real estate and all personal estate owned by him at the time of his death" (Wills Act 1988. 2005).
In this case it is seen that a trust has been created in favour of Ben and he has nominated Richard to hold the 2000 shares in trust on his behalf. Through his written will, he has directed that 950 of the above shares may be bequeathed to his Accountant, Tom, to be held on behalf of his nephew, Andrew, the legal beneficiary of the gifted shares.
In the decided case of Goldcorpe RE 1995, 1 AC 74, claims ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

company law, study case
1 Thus, in Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation the disputed transaction was not held to be void. The court came to this decision as the transaction was not wholly beyond the capacity of the company.2 The directors of a private company with just one class of shares are permitted to allot the same class of shares. In addition, they can convert securities into such…
Workplace Law Case Study
Hence all the laws and regulations related to awards, state or federal industrial laws are applicable and can be enforced, in case of such contracts (CCH Australia, 2010). For the purpose of this case study, the contractual true nature of contractual relationship of Jane Jones and TMMS will be studied from the perspective of Common Law, and the various legal issues pertaining to the case will be…
Equity and trust, Case Study. Case-Barclays Bank v Quistclose (1970) AC 567
2. Facts of the case. Quistclose lent money to a company Rolls Razor Ltd for a specific purpose of payment of dividends to its shareholders at a time when the company was having overdrawn facilities from Barclays Bank. Eventually, Quistclose went into liquidation when Quistclose sought to recover the money it lent lying in a separate account meant for that purpose, with the dividends remaining…
Law Master Case Study
Over a period of time, it is creating problems over the ownership of the house when the sharer dies or leaves the shared home for another place (Sharing Homes, The problem).…
COMPANY LAW / Case Study
However, she has not been paid her emoluments, although the other directors have been duly provided with their full emoluments.…
Property Law Master Case Study
or acted to her detriment on the basis of the common intention."…