[T]he government has a duty to protect the lives and properties of its citizens. But that is a duty which it owes all the time and which it must discharge without destroying our constitutional freedoms.The real threat to the life of the nation, in the sense of a people living in accordance with its traditional laws and political values, comes not from terrorism but from laws such as these…
This was regarded as a breach of the UK's obligations under the Human Rights Convention2. But the Government asserted its right on bringing about such limitations on human rights and civil liberties, as the whole issue was borne out of a desperate situation and keeping in mind the national security. National security concerns thus have become an intrinsic reason for curbing fundamental Human Rights that seek to restore greater danger to the well being of world citizens and that which is not only threatened by terrorism but also the erosion of basic human rights, and freedoms upon which delicate democracy is based.
Rights of people, as per ECHR, are put above the rights of states out of a realization, borne out of harsh reality, that states acted in self-interest to the detriment of humanity throughout history. From time immemorial, the concept of States always shares a sense of being threatened: a cause and effect relation of dominating and trying to offer resistance. It is generally believed that though there are peaceful and controlled environments existing within states, the international arena is anarchical and prone to uncontrollable violence. What these motifs do is put the focus of national security on the protection of one's territorial boundaries and sovereignty. Power comes to be measured through military capability, where everybody starts sharing a sense of being marginalized. The world begins to have an absurd dynamism and begins to operate on a zero-sum game in which, according to Peter Stoett, "security is obtained at the expense of others."3 Thus, is the issue of human rights is being traded off for more security, or whether security concerns, as Blair argued, should trump over human rights
In this regard, it is important to realize that Theodore Roosevelt's discourse on four freedoms is often cited as the nucleus of the development of the post-1945 human rights system. It was a model where freedom from fear and freedom from want were seen as being translated into the concept of civil and political rights and economic and social rights. Yet, when talking about the freedom from fear, Roosevelt referred to arms control, and not to human rights or individual security!4 Interestingly, nobody can deny that freedom from fear is an easily understood and tangible idea and a powerful wish which all of us share. However, if we study the matter closely, we find that that its promontory is definitely beyond the simplistic idea of human rights. For example, if we take Canada, we find that the country has taken up the idea of human security and has started to formulate it as a foreign policy priority.5 And following the initiative of Canada, other countries have come together to form the Human Security Network. The organization has been created as an amalgamation of the like-minded nations and aims to advance human security globally6. It also has a high level Commission on Human Security, which is co-chaired by Amartya Sen and Sadako Ogato.7 Yet, some view Human Rights as a paradigm, which has made a dramatic departure of traditional foreign policy concepts. Critics have accused the concept of being far to universalistic with conceptual flaws and have argued that it does not serve the victims of insecurity, but rather creates ...
Cite this document
(“European Convention of Human Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/law/311600-european-convention-of-human-rights
(European Convention of Human Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
“European Convention of Human Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/law/311600-european-convention-of-human-rights.
The basis on which Wicket World would defend the claim would be founded on a number of provisions of the law as enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act, 1998. The claim according to Article 8 on right to privacy is however limited by Article 18 that limits on use of restriction of rights.
This division is largely jurisdictional, based on the differences between immigration law and criminal law, as well as being technical in founding the division on the notion of difference between the rights of a citizen and non-citizen. The nature of human rights is for them to apply to all people regardless of race, nationality, sex, or ideology.
The focus has been put on the issue of the rights of detainees. Owing to the allegations of human rights violation by the UK government in the course of the War on Terror, the question of detainees’ rights has emerged as a complicated issue. The issue of the rights of the detainees is a very complex and dynamic legal debate and sometimes it may amount to ethical and technical dilemmas.
The act makes it illegal for all public bodies to take any actions or decisions which are in contravention to the European Convention on Human Rights.The only exception to this is Parliament, because it has the legislative capacity in the United Kingdom, and should, therefore, remain sovereign
It also explains their relationship in connection to the safeguard of individual rights in Europe (Aria-Takahashi 240). There are effects of these laws on the parliamentary sovereignty which are explained in this paper. The researcher also looks at which body is superior to other when it comes to human rights and implementation of these laws.
The arguments on whether the United Kingdom should withdraw from the European convention on human rights have raised great debate in the UK. Some have claimed that the adherence to the convention has been a hindrance to prosecution of criminals especially in case of international crimes.
A thriving and robust democracy, it is often said, can only be achieved when basic human rights are preserved. Cherished principles like press freedom, religious freedom, diversity and pluralism are indispensable requirements of a democratic society. It is difficult, if not altogether impossible, to argue against the validity of these principles.
They also signed 5 other protocols. The main objectives of the Convention are to maintain and protect the Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom, to achieve the unity between the members of the European Countries, to implement collectively the Human Rights proclaimed by General Assembly of United Nations as Universal Declaration of Human Rights on 10.12.1948.
rights within a legal framework is that an individual has certain rights, which will be the same for everyone, irrespective of age, gender, religion, nationality or sexual orientation. The European Convention on Human Rights has therefore set out certain provisions with the aim
In some cases, one needs only to show a strong likelihood of being affected instead of actual breach so long as you belong to a specific class of persons. For example, homosexual men were permitted to challenge laws that criminalized
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic European Convention of Human Rights for FREE!