A Critical Analysis of the Statement that, “The statutory exceptions to the nemo dat rule “developed piecemeal and interpreted restrictively by the courts, do not in policy terms represent either a rational or a cohesive set of rules for balancing the conflicting…
t the owner and who does not sell the goods under his authority or with the owner’s approval; the purchaser acquires no better title to the goods than that which the seller had (Clarke and Kohler, 2005, p. 30). This rule states that if a bona fide purchaser unknowingly purchases and subsequently sells stolen goods, he will be held liable in common law for the whole market price of those goods as at the date of transaction (Atiyah, 2005, p. 28). Common law states that the proper owner of the goods retains the legal title; as such, the nemo dat rule applies to the successive bona fide purchasers, implying that the actual owner can successfully bring an action against the fifth bona fide purchaser in trover as decided in Beverly Acceptances Ltd. v. Oakley, (1982) RTR 417.1
Goode (2004, p. 16) notes that even though this rule was put in place to protect the true owners of personal property and to allow them to assert their superior title over anyone else over the property, the rule propagates to a greater extent injustice to bona fide purchasers. Besides, it propagates injustice to third parties who are innocent making them lose their claim the moment the true owner appears to assert his title (Sealy, Hooley, and Hooley, 2008, p. 23). Therefore, in order to prevent injustice on the bona fide purchaser and third parties, there are a number of exceptions to nemo dat rule which have been put in place in English law as noted in Lowther v. Harris, (1927) 1 K.B 393.2 It is worth noting that these exceptions only provide a certain degree of protection to the bona fide purchaser and innocent third parties as well as well as the true or original owner (Goode, p. 2009, p. 45). In the English Law, this principle is clarified under the Sale of Goods Act.
The Sale of Goods Act 1994 specifies that the seller has to fulfil certain responsibilities before goods are sold legally. Rose (2001, p. 14) says that one of the most important clause of this rule is the ‘retention of ...
Cite this document
(“The nemo dat rule and its statutory exceptions - commercial law and Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/law/484136-the-nemo-dat-rule-and-its-statutory-exceptions-commercial-law-and-transactions
(The Nemo Dat Rule and Its Statutory Exceptions - Commercial Law and Essay)
“The Nemo Dat Rule and Its Statutory Exceptions - Commercial Law and Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/law/484136-the-nemo-dat-rule-and-its-statutory-exceptions-commercial-law-and-transactions.
That case will be discussed below but to fully understanding their reasoning a review of prior law is appropriate. In an older case Cundy v Lindsayii Lindsay & Co were manufacturers of linen handkerchiefs. They received correspondence from a rogue named Blenkarn who purported to be 'Blenkiron & Co',.
Many businesses have lost cases and many customers have lost cases in cases dealing with fraud and sale of goods. In accordance to the sale of goods acts, any individual is expected to be sold a good while in a good condition and should have the transfer of goods from the seller to the buyer.
57). In this regard, goods sold by a person who is not the owner and who does not sell the goods under his authority or with the owner’s approval; the purchaser acquires no better title to the goods than that which the seller had (Clarke and Kohler, 2005, p.
Article 2 of the UCC governs the sale of hard goods. The product that the UCITA deals with is strictly computer information and does not meet the definition of a "good." Information is not a hard good but merely intellectual property, even though it is stored on a material medium.
Laws are enforced by the police, supported by the court and prison systems. Laws are written by legislators, such as senators or congressmen. In America and many other countries, laws must uphold and not contradict the Constitution, a document outlining the most basic rules of the country.
In this context the theory does not apply to this case. Firstly the way John Leonard did. He believed that the Harrier jet was really in existence that he could win it. Mere advertisements in the media do not give rise to valid contracts. For instance there is lack of acceptance, which is more important to constitute a valid contract.
As an initial matter, the amount of commerce which takes place electronically continues to increase at significant levels. The United States Commerce Department “forecasts Internet retailing will exceed $50 billion
fully addressed, because even though the federal government was limited to exercising only enumerated powers, these powers included the power to regulate commerce.
Notwithstanding this expansion of federal power, certain actions and policies prevalent in several States have