In the case Ricci Vs DeStefano was a decision given by the US Supreme Court in a case brought from 12 city firefighters (11 were Whites and 1 Hispanic) against the New Haven, Connecticut Fire Department alleging that they were discriminated in their workplace and not given…
icials claimed that if they validated the results they could in turn be sued by a minority community for developing a practice that disadvantaged the minority groups (Supreme Court of the US 2008).
The use of disparate treatment as an alternative to disparate impact has to be strongly justified based on evidences and reasonable standards (remedial action). The Judge rejected the claim that the Department did not discriminate but said that the Department was involved in making a decision based on race, which was more like disparate treatment. IF there is a conflict between disparate treatment and disparate impact, then disparate treatment should be avoided based on clear and outright evidences and standards.
Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964: “Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (CRA) and the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 amend several sections of Title VII.”
By invalidating the results, there was an impermissible disparate impact, which in turn amounted to a racial preference, and was against Title VII. The Court gave a decision in favor of the 12 firefighters claiming that invalidation of their test results was a violation under Title VII.
Another judge mentioned that the court failed to provide a clarification between the provisions of disparate impact under Title VII and the equal protection clause under the US Constitution (14th Amendment). Other evidences suggested that there were many flaws in the testing system adopted by New Haven, and if the testing system was better, the results outcome was have not been skewed.
The court found the racial decision making adopted by New Haven Department as discriminatory and hence had to reinstate the results. However, it was also found that the testing system adopted by New Haven was improper compared to that of other Departments. However, this was not a basis invalidating the results obtained by the White ...
Cite this document
(“Business Law Conference Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/law/498983-business-law-conference
(Business Law Conference Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Business Law Conference Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/law/498983-business-law-conference.
This essay discusses that the senior partner has the ability to, personally, file a lawsuit against the client without even involving the firm, as it was his public image and reputation that was compromised. Additionally, he charges for any type of endorsement of service or product because he has been involved in television previously.
Did Alex have a legally enforceable contract with Francis? Does Francis have to sell the special offer set to Alex? A contract is an agreement between two or more individuals concerning agreed terms. A contract access when two people agree to the set terms while indicating interest to the offer.
This act strictly prohibits any act of bribery from or to any person to get things accomplished in an unlawful manner. The law was enacted because there was a serious concern for corrupt practices among American traders. These trading activities had a profound impact on the image of USA among other major trading partners.
Engaging in a business in a foreign country is entirely different from conducting a business domestically considering that a foreign country may have laws material to the business that are conflicting to domestic laws. Moreover, there is the issue as to how the business is to be conducted, which comes after a determination of the viability of Russia as market for chocolates, considering the distance between the UK and the Russian Federation.
These legal constraints cannot be understood in a singular fashion but rather must be understood within the context of the times that necessitated them. Accordingly, this brief analysis will review some of the laws that constrain business, seek to integrate an understanding of why they came to be in existence, and draw an overall level of importance with regards to the means by which these constraints help to benefit society and the end consumer.
The Holocaust was essentially realized by the ascension into power of the dictator Adolf Hitler. This period witnessed a significant transformation of the mode of life of the Jews. It is imperative to highlight that the lifestyles of the Jews plummeted all across Europe.
Arbitration refers a situating whereby two parties involved in a dispute agree instead going through a court process; they each propose a team of neutral members who oversees the process of reconciliation (Noussia 8). Arbitration is an alternative mode of resolving rows