Juvenile - Admission/Application Essay Example

Juvenile 2 The first group debate question is “should juvenile be tried as adults?” Pros a) Trying juvenile in court as adults helps in controlling crime. b) It acts as a deterrent for crime because it makes other juvenile to think twice before committing the crime because of the punishment. Cons a) Juveniles should not be tried in courts as adults because their brains are not fully developed. b) The punishment in adult court is hasher to be implemented on juvenile cases. Discussion In my opinion, juveniles should be tried in courts same as adults because it helps in controlling criminal activities among the youth. According to surveys, juvenile cases decreased due to attempts to judge young offenders in adults’ courts. However, there is an increasing trend among young people engaging in serious and dangerous activities. Several criminal cases involve offenders who have past records of criminal history. Juveniles with past cases such as murder and rape should not be exempted from adults’ courts because by judging them under juvenile courts will encourage other individual to bridge the law. The second group debate question is “should juvenile receive the death penalty?” Pros a) Juveniles should receive the same punishment as adults. b) Imposing the death sentence on juveniles will act as deterrence to others intending to commit crimes. Cons a) Juveniles should not receive the death penalty because their brains are not fully developed. b) The juvenile justice system is about rehabilitation thus death penalty should be excluded. Discussion Juveniles should receive the death penalty in courts because it deters other young people from committing offences. My opinion over this issue is based on the fact that options such as financial fines and short-term incarnation cannot stop young offenders from committing serious offences such as murder. At the age of sixteen and seventeen, youth are in a position to make informed decisions about their actions. Just like athletic competitions have some competitors that are brighter than them, thus some juveniles are more brutal in their actions than others. Implementing harsher punishments such as death sentence for violent juvenile crimes helps in stopping societal conditions which intrigue young people in committing crimes. Naturally most individuals fear death because it is an in born character that a person has and they reflect on it before taking any action. The death penalty among the youth is important because it saves the lives of many prospective victims who are at stake. Therefore, death is a familiarity that cannot be conceived in the minds of juvenile offenders because ends all practice. The notion that death sentence is more costly than detention is false. Maintenance of life time sentence cases for juveniles in prisons is always costly than the costs incurred when processing death penalty cases. The third group debate question is “should victim of child abuse testify in court?” Pros a) Victims of child abuse should testify in courts because it helps in preventing misunderstanding about what transpired. b) Court testimonies present by affected children helps them to attain sense of fulfillment. Cons a) Victims of child abuse should not testify in courts because it makes them to feel worse. b) Victims are prone to making false accusations in courts when they are given a chance to testify. Discussion Victims of child abuse should not testify in courts because social predicaments and legal proceedings increases stress in their lives. My take on this position stems from the fact that court settings are usually designed to address and resolve contentious issues. This, settings makes children to be haunted by the past occurrences. Court proceedings makes children to feel anxious since they the system does not fit them. Moreover, children are dependent on adults and their development both cognitively and emotionally is mostly disrupted when they are involved in court proceedings. Further, direct conduct between the offender and the victims leads to distress among the victims to the extent of affecting the legal proceedings. Cases involving family member as offenders causes much stress to the children called to witness. The last group debate question is “should juvenile dependants be tried in juvenile court? Pros a) Juvenile dependants should be tried in juvenile courts because it helps in stopping guardians and parents from neglecting their role. b) Trying juvenile dependants in courts helps in protecting the society against criminal activities. Cons a) Juvenile dependents should not be tried in court because it will lead to discrimination due to community labeling. b) It may make the parent to neglect the child more. Discussion Juvenile dependents children should be tried in court because it reduces criminal activities in the society. My argument is based on the fact that juvenile systems address issues that contribute towards presence of neglected and dependent children in the society. By trying juvenile dependents in courts, the society is protected from other crimes because it acts as a warning to other young people. Those youth who misses parental guidance usually learn to take care of themselves rather involving in criminal activities. In addition trying juveniles in courts helps the juvenile system to address several issues in the society such as divorce cases which leads to children abandonment, support and custody, civil commitment in regards to mentally challenged or mentally ill youth in need of special support, and youth emancipation. Handling of these issues improves the well being of neglected children in the society thus reducing the chances of them being involved in criminal activities. Apart from addressing causes of dependency or designing mitigation procedures, juvenile courts helps in keeping law and order in the society. Work Cited Tracy, Paul E. Decision Making and Juvenile Justice: An Analysis of Bias in Case Processing. New York: Praeger, 2002. Print. Read More