An Unmanageable -Management Quandary - Case Study Example

Case study of An Unmanageable Case Management An Unmanageable Case-Management Quandary Case StudyIn law, case management is key in administration of justice. This has proved worthwhile in handling of cases filed within verifiable time period, hearing cases satisfactorily and speedy delivery of the final verdict. However, a growing caseload and increasing difficulties in avoidance of the backlog have proved quite a challenge in managing the cases adequately. A hybrid system that is a combination of individual and master case-management have evolved in due time to handle these cases.

This paper focuses on the advantages and difficulties of the hybrid system of case management. In addition to that, there will be a look at the advantages and disadvantages of individual and master calendar systems with regard to issues in the criminal division. Thereafter a recommendations with regard to this courts statistical report. Case management approach constitutes of two systems namely individual and Master calendar system. In individual calendar system a filed case is dealt with by one judge to full completion.

The advantage in regard to this is that cases are heard fully, there are no interferences from other forces such as other judges and any other potential rivalries. This enhances speedy delivery of final judgment but, it rather limits the judgment since other different perspectives and opinions are not in play. On the contrary, the master calendar system seems to be much effective according to Chung (2011). It allows different views into play and thus not limiting the judgment. It is disadvantaged in that it delays decisions on cases as the other judges who come into play differ in decisions, philosophies and fear contradicting earlier judgment made by judges thereon.

This slows down decisions on cases as they deliberate more on the diverse issues raised. Criminal division is a rotation of judges between criminal and civic law system. This has far implications in regard to its advantages and disadvantages associated with it. One of the merits is that it relieves burn-outs of judges due to emotional intensity cases and facilitates ease from workloads. On the other it’s quite limiting in cases where final verdict on a case was not reached. This leads to prolonging of the case as newest judge has to familiarize with the case before determining its verdict.

Therefore, it leads to delay of judgment upon the prevalent case and many cases are left pending. Juvenile division refers to the courts put in place in correction of the minors in the society as Sutton (1985) elaborates. For instance, judges deployed on a permanent basis in this court face quite a number of problems. First, they burn-out due to handling huge workload of cases and emotional intensity of such cases. In cases of delinquency they are obligated to decide on age-related offenses to verify whether delinquent act was committed.

There are difficulties in deciding cases dealing with dependency and emancipation when the minor’s defendants oppose on the custody of the minor (Chung, 2011). Lastly, one recommends that in this particular court, all case statistics should be compiled and there should be issuance of 6-month circuit court. A digital operations sytem ought to be incorporated too. In addition to that statistical and financial reports should also be issued from time to time so as to prepare adequately for any unforeseeable comings such as pending legislation and handling of workload.

ReferenceChung, C. (2011). What Type of Problems Does a Judge Have in the Juvenile Court Division? Retrieved on 25 March 2013 from http://www.ehow.com/info_8570913_type-judge-juvenile-court-division.html#ixzz2OcRLri3WSutton, J. R. (1985). The Juvenile Court and social welfare: dynamics of progressive reform. Law & Society Review, 19(1), 7-9