US Government vs Israelis Controversies - Essay Example

However, there are a lot of controversies related to the establishment of the ICC. These controversies have created a complex political nature of International lawsuits which eventually has created attention for remedy (Carroll, 21).

The U.S. government and the Israelis were reluctant to sign the agreement meant to ratify the development of the international criminal court. This is because the two states feared that the ICC would be a threat to their internal situations. For instance, they feared that their soldiers would be prosecuted due to war crimes. In addition, another state also saw ICC as a threat due to the introduction of hybrid procedures. However, all these political issues led to complexity in handling international trials (Carroll, 21).

The International criminal court carries out proceedings that are faced with a lot of problems. The first one is that their trials are long and expensive. However, as a global community, we should solve this problem through the application of Guilty pleas. These are the admission of blameworthiness by an individual accused of a crime. In most cases, a prosecutor in the international criminal court can be allowed to play a part in a plea bargain. In this case, the prosecutor will agree to reduce punishment or charges in return for a guilty plea. This guilty plea is important because it helps in avoiding complicated, expensive, and lengthy trials. In addition, the international criminal court will avoid consuming resources and will help in handling a sizable caseload and dealing swiftly with complex cases (Carroll, 23).

The second problem is that the International Criminal Court fails to recognize the basic rights of the accused individuals. To solve this problem, the set of procedures used in the ICC should include the basic rights of the accused individuals (Carroll, 22). These rights include the presumption of innocence, the right to know the evidence used by the prosecutor, the right to remain silent, the right to ask for a lawyer, and the right to understand his or her trial.

The other problem is the inefficiency of the ICC to handle the world’s malevolent wrongdoers. The international criminal court has inefficient judicial proceedings. To solve this kind of problem, it should conduct proceedings that are fair and expeditious (Carroll, 21). In addition, the judges should act as the final decision-makers and managers of these proceedings.

Despite the establishment of an international criminal court to solve serious crimes, there are a lot of political issues which have increased the complexity of international trials. This complexity is related to problems arising from the proceedings of the ICC. However, these problems can be solved through the application of a guilty plea, recognizing the basic rights of the accused individuals, and improving the utilitarianism of the ICC.