StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Skeleton argument - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The trial judge was in the right direction look at term (a) in the aspect of its meaning and ruling that (b) was inconsiderate based on the Unfair Terms of Consumer Contracts Regulations 1977 and Edwards was not contracted by it.
5. The office of Fair Trading states clearly…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
Skeleton argument
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Skeleton argument"

Skeleton Argument due: In the court of appeal Between- of the East of England (Appellant)andEdwards (Respondent)Authorities1. Office of Fair Trading ‘Guidance on Unfair Terms in Tenancy Agreements’ [1.8].2. ‘The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission’ (LAW COM No.292) (SCOT LAW COM No 199) 1.93. ‘Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977’ 11 (3)Ground of response4. The trial judge was in the right direction look at term (a) in the aspect of its meaning and ruling that (b) was inconsiderate based on the Unfair Terms of Consumer Contracts Regulations 1977 and Edwards was not contracted by it.

Submissions5. The office of Fair Trading states clearly that the unfair conditions are not contractual on consumers. It therefore proposes that an individual consumer has the right to question terms they feel to be inconsiderate1. In this case Ms Edwards has legal rights to challenge term (b) that stated that the student will be liable for the destruction incurred when the responsible person is unknown. 6. ‘The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission’ established that in consumer contracts there are terms included that are not personally negotiated2.

The role of UCTA is to determine if the terms used are fair or unfair. In this particular case Ms Edwards was not involved in any kind of negotiations on term (a) and (b) of the tenancy agreement.7. The ‘Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977’ mentions that it is necessary for the terms in a contract to meet the specification of reasonableness3. This would permit a term to be fair and dependent. The terms in the tenancy contract did not meet these requirements.(Name) Senior Counsel for the respondentLaw FirmIn the court of appeal (Name of Counsel)On judgement from the trial chambersBetweenUNIVERSITY OF THE EAST OF ENGLAND (Appellant)-and-EDWARDS(Respondent)__________________________________________SKELETON ARGUMENTOn behalf of Ms Edwards (“the Respondent”)__________________________________________Introduction1.

This skeleton discusses the second ground. The trial judge did not fail by ruling that the term (c) was inconsiderate under UCTA. Submissions2. The ‘Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977’ 2 (2) states that in the event of harm or loss, the individual shall not limit or eliminate the liability unless the term fulfils the necessity of reasonableness4. In this case the term (c) is considered unreasonable.3. In the case of London Borough of Newha v Khatun, Zeb and Iqbal; CA [24-Feb-2004] held that the terms of a tenancy agreement are controlled by the Unfair Contract Regulations to determine the unfair phrases and prevent them from being enforced5. 4. In the event the established acts and regulations may not permit the enforcement of a principle in this particular case, this court has the authority to develop their implementations.a. The loss or destruction of property while in the university premises should not be assumed to be the student’s liability. b. If the student suffered the damage as a consequence of failure by the University to protect the property, she is entitled compensation.

Conclusion 5. Because of the above facts, we honourably plea your Lordships to reject this appeal. Name of the counsel(Junior Respondent)Law Firm - dateBibliographyAdmin ‘London Borough of Newham -v- Khatun, Zeb and Iqbal; CA 24-Feb-2004’Swarbcouk (May 21, 2014) ˂http://swarb.co.uk/london-borough-of-newham-v-khatun-zeb-and-iqbal-ca-24-feb-2004/˃ Accessed January 1, 2015.Office of Fair Trading ‘Guidance on Unfair Terms in Tenancy Agreements’ Www.gov.uk. (September 1, 2005) ˂https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284440/oft356.

pdf˃ Accessed January 1, 2015The Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor, and The Scottish Ministers ‘The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission’ Justice.gov.uk (February 2005) ˂http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc292_Unfair_Terms_In_Contracts.pdf˃ Accessed January 1, 2015.The Legislation.gov.uk. ‘Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977’ Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977(1977) ˂http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/50˃ Accessed January 1, 2015

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Skeleton argument Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Skeleton argument Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1673143-skeleton-argument
(Skeleton Argument Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Skeleton Argument Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1673143-skeleton-argument.
“Skeleton Argument Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1673143-skeleton-argument.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Skeleton argument

Contract law incorporation notice UCTA 1977

Acting as counsel for the appellant MML prepare a Skeleton argument for your client dealing with both of these points.... IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JUSTICE Case No: 12/03/07 IN THE MOOT COURT OF APPEAL Magnificent Marquees Appellant V IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JUSTICE Case No: 12/03/07IN THE MOOT COURT OF APPEALMagnificent MarqueesAppellantVJuicy Drinks LimitedRespondentSkeleton Argument of Counsel for the AppellantJuicy Drinks Limited Respondent Skeleton argument of Counsel for the Appellant 1....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Contract law incorporation notice UCTA 1977

Acting as counsel for the appellant MML prepare a Skeleton argument for your client dealing with both of these points.... At the marquee they hoped to entertain some valuable customers.... These customers will potentially sign a very lucrative sales contract at lunch in the… Joseph, the Managing Director of Juicy Drinks Limited, visits the small office of MML and looks at some brochures of the marquees, agrees to hire one and is given a booking slip....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Oral Presentation: Principle of Evidence

Fiona makes her application on various grounds, which are helpfully outlined in the Skeleton argument filed on her behalf.... Firstly, the skeleton refers to the fact that Elizabeth had a limited understanding of English and therefore she should have been accompanied by an… Additionally, the skeleton refers to the fact that Elizabeth was questioned continuously for four hours without any break for food or drink, which clearly created a significant risk of any subsequent answers given by her being unreliable....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Manslaughter Case Analysis

Nevertheless, such a CRIMINAL LAW Task Skeleton argument A.... As such, he plants a bomb in a leading lab in Sheffield city centre.... Prior to that, he offers a warning despite the fact that the person who disarms the bomb (Sarah) dies… Analysis of the case indicates that Ben will be charged with voluntary manslaughter....
2 Pages (500 words) Coursework

Intellectual Property Right: The Case Rihanna v Topshop

Examine the factors leading judge to make his decision on the case.... How did the judge substantiate the claim of passing off?... Was the defendant's act a deception to their clients, did it case damage to plaintiff, and did it affect plaintiff's goodwill? Intellectual… y right may refer to the creation of something of values such as patents, designs, trademarks and copyright, that is distinctive from what have been created by other people....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Intellectual Property: Fenty v Arcadia Case

In Fenty v Arcadia [2013] EWHC 2310 (Ch), the issue of using of celebrity images on merchandising without celebrity consent or authority has been addressed.... The case involves Rihanna who is an American pop star and Topshop, an England based fashion retailer.... Rihanna was… The photograph in question was taken by an independent photographer and Topshop had obtained a licence from the photographer, but it had not obtained a licence from Rihanna....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Argument on Behalf of the Appellant

This case is quite different from the case of Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995] in which the OF COURT XXX BETWEEN: Hasting (Appellant) And Sunburst (Respondent) Skeleton argument ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT The Grounds of Appeal The award of £1000 as damages is inadequate because the damages are not sufficient in proportion to the £30000 cost of replacing the mahogany....
1 Pages (250 words) Case Study

Representations of Virgin Mary in Day of the Dead

The paper "Representations of Virgin Mary in Day of the Dead" discusses the argument against depicting the Virgin Mary with a skull face and skeleton hands during festivals such as the Day of the Dead.... Depictions of the Virgin Mary as essentially a skeleton go against the religious tenets of not only the Catholic but Orthodox faiths as well.... It is essential to note that because of the many centuries during which the Virgin has been venerated by Catholics, she has achieved an extremely high position within the Church, and to represent her as a skeleton shows a lack of respect for those faithful who venerate her....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us