Business law exam Grade Course (30th, Oct, 2012) Business law exam Part A Unfair labor practices This refers to the practices that interfere with the workers’ right to join and participate in labor unions. Unfair labor practices are used by employers to deny their employees the legal rights they should enjoy in the work place…
This definition also ensures that the employer is protected against unlawful acts by employees, which might jeopardize the welfare of the organization. The Rand formula This stipulates the requirement of the Canadian employment laws, requiring that all employees should pay the trade union dues and subscriptions, notwithstanding their union membership status. The significance of The Rand formula for labor laws in Canada is to ensure that employees do not disassociate themselves with union membership through failing to pay the required dues, yet they benefit from the functions of the union. Wagnerism This is a provision of the law allowing employees in the private sector to engage in lawful labor practices, such as the establishment of labor unions, participating in lawful strikes and signing collective bargaining agreements with their employers. However, the law exempts certain employees from being considered eligible for Wagnerism, such as the domestic workers. The significance of Wagnerism for labor law in Canada is to give employees working under private sector the rights to exercise their freedom at the workplace, though within the confines of the law. Secondary picketing This refers to lawful protesting by employees in support of their union activities, in a different location that is not their employer’s premises. Secondary picketing allows the union members to undertake protests or demonstrations in favor of their union, where the employer has blocked them from accessing the premises. The significance of secondary picketing for labor laws in Canada is to allow employees a channel through which they can express their grievances, on the event that their employer has blocked them from protesting within the employer’s premises. Part B Question 1 The role of International Labor Organization (ILO) is to set and oversee the adherence of the international standards of labor, as well as fair working conditions and terms, for employees globally. Thus, the ILO provides guidance for the acceptable labor standards, while advocating for the improvement of the working environment for the employees. The ILO also defines the relationship between employees and employers, with a focus on the rights and responsibilities of each party. The impact of ILO functions, on the Canadian Labor laws, is to streamline the laws so they match the required international standards and requirements. Question 2 The role of the arbitrator, as stipulated by the Canadian labor laws, is to intervene in the conflict between employees and their employers. Therefore, an arbitrator plays the role of resolving the conflict arising at the work place, or any other work related conflicts between the employer and employees. The functions and powers of the arbitrator were extended by a court ruling, granting an arbitrator the powers to require specific performance from an employer or an employee, depending on who is wrong. The impact of the Weber decision to the powers of the arbitrator is that it extended these powers, to allow an arbitrator change the collective agreement terms between the employer and the employee, as the arbitrator deems necessary. Question 4 The relationship between a union and its members is that of a contract. Therefore, the contract is established on the basis of the union receiving dues and subscriptions from the members, and in turn the union represents the interest ...
Cite this document
(“Business law exam Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/law/75730-business-law-exam
(Business Law Exam Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Business Law Exam Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/law/75730-business-law-exam.
Along with the profile of the company all the ethical issues related to the company’s operations and the criticism raised against such issues would be analyzed as well. The company has been subject to ethical implications like; environmental pollution, bribery and false advertisement of its products.
In order to pass judgment in this case, the partnership agreement would be examined and discussed according to the court of law case. Issues like business law, business partnership, intellectual property, and limited liability will be investigated to further our understanding of the case.
5 (c)What was the nature of the term which the primary judge, Jagot J. had implied into the contract, and on what grounds and case law did the judges on appeal decide that such implied term (of fact) wasn’t required to give ‘business efficacy’ to the contract?
1). The same Act also provides that "every person who shall monopolize, or combine, or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among several states, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony  (codified in 15 U.S.C., sec.
It was evident that the injury was caused due to the negligence of the shop owner, and that Henry could sue the management of The Learned Wig for damages under the existing English Law. The warning put by the management would in no way was
federal and state government do enjoy such authority as the endangered species of birds needed to be saved from the radio active emissions of the vehicles. Also, there have been many such cases where the interracial marriages have not been successful and rather contributed to
eral government is supported by the Constitution to enact any laws that would serve the purpose of protecting the interests of US citizens; in a similar vein, state governments, which act as independent plenary bodies, can also make laws as stipulated in the diverse state
re the exam started, Eelbode was obliged to sign a document that stated in part, "I hereby release Chec and the Washington Readicare Medical Group and its physicians from all liability arising from any injury to me resulting from my participation in the exam.”, this document
A panel selected winners in different categories, over a period and one of the promotion’s regulations was that winners had to agree specific regulations before claiming their prices. A provision, put under
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Business law exam for FREE!