We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Frank Special Filed a Claim Against Ivo A. Baux, M.D - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
This paper tells that on March 17, 2005, Frank Special filed a claim against Ivo A. Baux, M.D who worked at West Boca Medical Center. The claim was filed not against the given medical establishment, but against the doctor in particular as he was accused of negligence that led to the death…
Download paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER

Extract of sample
Frank Special Filed a Claim Against Ivo A. Baux, M.D

However, medical examiner Barbara Wolf, who performed an autopsy, stated that no AFE was revealed, while it is usually revealed in such cases. The fault of Dr. Baux was actively disputed.
Petitioner claimed that the testimony of the important witness, Gary Didly, M. D. was considered in the wrong way by Judge Kelley. Gary Didly was an expert invited by defendants to confirm that the cases of AFE are not so rare as it was stated by the experts invited by Plaintiff. After the cross-examination Special was sure that he undermined the conclusion made by Daily, however, the court did not accept that and considered this to be an impeachment. The judgment was made in favor of the Defendants and Dr. Baux was considered not guilty. Petitioner wanted to have a new trial stating that the medical center has an epidemic of amniotic fluid embolism. He applied to the Fourth District Court of Appeal, which stated that “[t]o avoid a new trial, the beneficiary of the error in the trial court must show on appeal that it is more likely than not that the error did not influence the trier of fact and thereby contribute to the verdict” Id. at 771. On October 19, 2007 the verdict was returned for Defendants. On June 23, 2010 majority opinion was issued stating that the error made by the judge who did not include the testimony of Gary Deadly, was minor and did not influence much the case and the verdict. Discretionary jurisdiction was considered not necessary because even if the case is reconsidered, the opposite verdict would not be reached in any case. The claim of Special was rejected and the case was not reconsidered.
Special sued Dr. Baux because his wife died after her delivery. However, she was about 40 years old and had problems with health during her pregnancy. The results of delivery testify that the child was successfully delivered, thus spinal anesthesia was made properly. ... Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Frank Special Filed a Claim Against Ivo A. Baux, M.D Case Study”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/law/794908-case-study-analysis
(Frank Special Filed a Claim Against Ivo A. Baux, M.D Case Study)
https://studentshare.net/law/794908-case-study-analysis.
“Frank Special Filed a Claim Against Ivo A. Baux, M.D Case Study”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/law/794908-case-study-analysis.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Os Claim Against VC for Outstanding Freight
Admiralty Law Question 1: O’s Claim Against VC for Outstanding Freight O’s claim against VC for the outstanding freight depends largely on two factors. First, it must be determined whether or not VC breached the contract for the delivery of crude oil from Piraeus, Greece to Southampton, UK.
19 Pages(4750 words)Coursework
To analyze Michael Sandel's argument in The Case against Perfection and make and argue a claim about it
Sandel claims that genetic and other pharmaceutical types of biological enhancements to human efficiency of operation corrupt the telos or fundamental meaning and goal of the system they are deployed into in order to improve, both personally for the individual and for society as a whole.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Criminal justice process for a felony criminal charge filed in a state court
Hence, any act becomes a crime only when the act or action meets the legalities that describe it as such. The concept of crime and criminality is not static, as it evolves and changes with the changing society. The concept of crime can be understood by the use of the consensus and conflict models.
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
Frank Norriss Zola as a Romantic Writer
People internalize the meaning of Naturalism in a vague sense. Naturalism is a part of Realism and it represents matters in fiction as they are in reality. Norris in his essay ‘Zola as a Romantic writer’ says that the writings of Zola are a part of Romanticism, as Romanticism is just the opposite of Realism.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Can Sinkers claim demurrage against the cricket clubs
Isbrandisen-Moller [1951] 1 K.B. 240, at 2491. Demurrage forms one of the most important parts of carriage of goods by sea. Demurrage is the recovery of the consequential freight lost, due to the fault of other parties, and not that of the ship owners. Demurrage occurs when the vessel is detained beyond the agreed lay days, as it becomes a breach of contract.
17 Pages(4250 words)Essay
Developing a Lens Claim
Radtke (Jacobs, 2010) claims that the "fanciful melding of English and Chinese as the hallmark of a dynamic, living language" and preservation of this union, the Chinglish, is not unlike that of the preservation of endangered species. Just like soccer, which Foer described as a tabula rasa, Chinglish is also "something very different" (p.
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Homeowners file a tort claim against a theme park
In criminal law, the state is portrayed as the bigger offended party than the plaintiff such that if a defendant is proven guilty the state metes out the appropriate punishment. It is different in tort cases, in which the plaintiff, whose more popular assignation now is “claimant,” is the victim of the alleged wrong.
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study
Anne Frank - The Diary of a Young Girl
It could be considered a typical teenager diary, though with the flavorings that came with living during the Holocaust. As the book is a journal, there is no
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Should the U.S. Justice Department have filed suit against Arizona's new immigration policy
Further, any bonafide citizen in Arizona may bring suit to challenge a state or local policy that restricts enforcement of federal immigration law (Garcia, p2).The possible enactment of the
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Criminal justice process for a felony criminal charge filed in a state court
The process consists of a number of serious activities undertaken by professionals who ensure that they provide satisfactory closure to the criminal cases in the states while according the suspects the desired justice, fairness and dignity (Gibson, 2002).
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Frank Special Filed a Claim Against Ivo A. Baux, M.D for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us