Running head: term paper Term Paper Course: Date: Table of contents Contents page no. 1. Part : Issues identified 3 2. Legal Memos 5 3. Personal approach to leading an ethical organization 7 Part 1: Issues identified 1. Nouv’s discussion with Betty: Isn’t Nouv violating the code of ethics by soliciting nonpublic information from insiders of another organization, the Dependable Optics Association, Inc, in exchange of profits that Nouv would make by using this information for trading on that organization?…
Is it right on Nouv’s part to dismiss Emily without investigating into the issue that she raised about Betty’s concerns regarding the incentive compensations for her team and herself? Is Betty right in supporting Nouv on this decision putting aside Emily’s character, performance and commitment? Is Nouv’s decision to terminate Billy Aged, Cindy Octane, Tommy Grey and Belinda Black right from the business and employment law perspective? Is Nouv abiding by the employment law or is he violating? Are the reasons for his decision ethically and legally correct? How good is Nouv’s offer to Betty in exchange of all the tasks he assigned to her? Are the favors he is expecting from Betty within scope of the business or their professional relationship? How good or bad was Betty’s reaction to this one? 2. ...
Did Betty do the right thing with other employees that were on Nouv’s list of employee termination? Was Betty biased in her actions? If yes, was she biased towards her boss or towards the company? Is Betty’s decision to delete the draft agreement sent to DOA upon receiving insider information ethically and morally the right thing? Will this have any legal implications in future? 3. Actions from Emily Ethical: Have Emily and/or others at QP faced discrimination of any sort? If yes, do they have the right to fight against it? Is Betty guilty of discriminating against Emily and/or others although she only followed Nouv’s orders? Is Emily right in filing a class action suit against Nouv, Betty and QP? Can she do it on behalf of other employees? Will Emily be able to provide sufficient evidence to the court to prove her point and has there actually been violation of some sort of law by QP, Betty and Nouv? 4. Bill in the new territory: Is the deal made between Mr. I Business and QP valid? Does it have information sufficient to be called legally satisfying? How justifiable was the deal given to Mr. Business, of the weekend trip, to QP? Did the person from the Ministry of Defense deserve the arrest? Did Bill do the right thing by writing a check? Was Bill’s action of abandoning his car after bumping into two vehicles and escaping from the site the right thing to do? What repercussions might he eventually face? 5. The Board Meeting: Is it justified to hold a board meeting with some members absent? Will the decisions taken in such meeting stand true? Is Nouv’s decision of extending credit to one of QP’s customers in exchange for security interest in the customer’s ‘general inventory’ correct? Was this action supported by legal formalities ...
Cite this document
(“Law Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/literature/5379-term-paper
(Law Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Law Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/literature/5379-term-paper.
Ageism and age discrimination are different from each other,as ageism is application of assumed age –based group distinctiveness to an person,regardless of individual‘s actual personal character.However age discrimination refers to the rough ‘age proxies’ in personal decisions in regards to selecting,hiring,discharging,promotion,transfer,training and mandatory training
The respondent sued the Appellants in 2008 on allegations of failing to abide by the non-competition terms. The hearing judge granted the respondent a preliminary injunction seeking to enforce the non-competition accord, but formed a ‘Restricted Territory’ that was not present in the earlier agreement. Before the transaction turned out to become a legal suit, there were steps the management of Rector could have taken to prevent it.
The ECHR also attempted to create a balance between the interests of society at large and protection of the fundamental rights of individuals in democratic countries. The HR Act 1998 gave binding effect to ECHR in the United Kingdom and thus allowed disputes regarding the rights in the Conventions to be brought under the purview of the courts in the United Kingdom.
While industrialisation has its positive aspects of generating revenues, offering employment opportunities and raising standards of living of people; it also leads to depletion of scarce energy resources, seriously
to the constitutionalization of the federal governments authority to support "Progress of Science and useful Arts" via copyright law, provisos for derivative infringement, and fair use requirements. In disparity, Canadian copyright law does not constitutionalize provision
iples which must be obeyed and followed by citizens, subject to sanctions or legal consequences” (Cheeseman 25). The concept of law is complex and is based upon the fundamentals of common and civil law. Both of these laws are essential in the American court system, and will
The member states had their own national rules and regulations. These rules governed areas that were to be modified under the new European Community Laws. The European Community Laws modified these national laws through the regulation of the economy and this