Analysis of the Classification of the Web - Term Paper Example

? Analysis of the ification of the Web Analysis of the ification of the Web ification of the Web: Challenges and inquiries is a scholarly journal by Jens-Erik Mai where he focuses on the approaches that are centered in their usage regarding an organization as well as knowledge representation. The author puts an interest in comprehending how individuals utilize information in their places of work as well as how that information ought to be organized and presented in an effort to give support to their work. This paper aims at analyzing both the strengths as well as the weaknesses addressed by his article in regards to web classification and search of information. Results of a search are made possible by words as well as phrase that users’ type into the search engines. These terms and phrases match the terms being searched. Before any type of marketing of a search engine is conducted, one has to comprehend the target audience and be aware of the search terms being used (June, 2010). These terms are what help in diversion of web traffic. According to Jens-Erik Mai, there is efficiency created when keywords are used when conducting a search on information concerning specific places, people, or even things with names that are unique (June, 2010). This is a major strength as, when using major search engines, what guides a search result is use of keywords. The search engine contents are rich in specific keywords and as such, they aim at attracting more traffic (June, 2010). Use of keywords tends to provide specific information as searched without much strain. If the Search engine contents did not incorporate use of keywords, they would be less effective as searches would result to a wide range of resultant information, both relevant and irrelevant. Therefore, use of keywords is essential as it saves time, energy and even costs of finding information and thereby acting as an effective tool in information searching when using search engines (June, 2010). Another strength addressed by Jens-Erik Mai’s article is the use of search engines in the notion of classified Web directories when conducting a research on concepts expressed in numerous ways (Koraljka, 2005). As such, it is an effective tool where synonyms and antonyms are controlled. A web directory works in such a way that web sites are organized based on the subject matter of a site. People and not software maintain web directories (Wesley & Tsau, 2005). When using a web directory, a researcher is provided with an option involving sites organized in category series as well as menus. They are smaller as compared to databases of search engines (Koraljka, 2005). In support of this strength, directories are links to subjects that are classified. They are effective tools, as they tend to deliver a similar service to search engines but there is a modest difference. As such, the directories do a classification of the internet web Pages in terms of categories and then present it to a researcher. This is done whereby; it simplifies the ways in which an individual comes across the most appropriate websites (Koraljka, 2005). Introduction of a related technique of retrieval as well as a related organizational technique called Thesaurus is a major strength in web classification as presented by Mai. It is an effective tool, which offers the benefits of search by phrases rather than notations. Thesaurus gives classification as well as records management a support. This is usually at file level. This tool ensures that terms of classification are utilized in a consistent manner all through the system of recordkeeping (Koraljka, 2005). As such, by classifying records based on functions, provide numerous benefits for management as well as records retrieval. The classification of records, which is functional, establishes a structure used to assist in determination and retention implementation, access of decisions and security and this is inclusive of creation in sentencing (Terry & Fabio, 2003). Still, a consistent tilt of records as well as use of language that is in nature consistent all through the organization help in retrieval of records and information sharing across the entire organization (Wesley & Tsau, 2005). Furthermore, there is a tendency for functional classification to establish as well as documenting business activities and records relationships. As such, it is vital in record comprehension, and particularly over a period (Wesley & Tsau, 2005). One of the weaknesses accessed by Jens-Erik Mai concerning the web directories is that, due to emphasis on use of free keywords in the strategy of search, they tend to struggle to find their role as well as individuals as and search engine services tend to unrecognized it as a valuable tool. In support to this, web directories bring forth information regardless of the quality (Wesley & Tsau, 2005). The only important aspect is that the directories only link individual web pages and as such, all links represents a recommendation, which is based on interest rather than quality (Terry & Fabio, 2003). In practice, algorithms assign a rank on every page. This depends on the number pages that are linked to it. This is a bias, as there is unequal value in the links. As such, a recommendation is important when the information comes from having a high rank. On weaknesses of web classification concerning web directories, there is no adoption of scheme of classification as the structure of their organization. Instead, the web directories tend to create their own structures. An immense interest exists in creation of web directories (Wesley & Tsau, 2005). Even though there is a large use of directories, how they are constructed has no principle-guiding factor as those attributable to bibliographic knowledge community organization. It is important that classification principles as well as structures of classification be subject to further exploration and applied together with the internet if it intends to survive as an information source that is effective (Terry & Fabio, 2003). Still, a weakness of web classification as addressed by the article regards the bibliographic organization of knowledge theory. As such, the practice has been unable to avail its knowledge to the community of the web directory. However, according to the article, it is clear that the established principles based on organization community’s bibliographic knowledge necessitate adaptation for it to be essential in the environment, which in itself, is dynamic (Terry & Fabio, 2003). Again, another weakness of web classification is addressed concerning the value as well as the role of the approach, which is classified, to web documents retrieval is not yet crystallized. In most services concerned with searches, use of free keyword is stressed and as such, it seems like those renowned web directories are in a state of struggle in finding their role as well as recognition of their value to the web search services users (Terry & Fabio, 2003). Jens-Erik Mai article puts a focus on the approaches that are centered in their usage regarding an organization as well as knowledge representation. The author puts an interest in comprehending how individuals utilize information in their places of work as well as how that information ought to be organized and presented in an effort to give support to their work. The strengths as well as the weaknesses addressed in the article concerning classification of the web are justifiable as discussed in this paper. As such, web classification is an effective tool for which a researcher gets the desired information without strain and thereby saving a lot of resources as well as time and energy. Irrespective of this ineffectiveness, it is evident that there is still a weak aspect when web classification is made use of. References June, A. (2010). Structures for Organizing Knowledge: Exploring Taxonomies, Ontologies, and Other Schemes. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers Koraljka, G. (2005). Automated subject classification of textual web pages, for browsing. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning Terry, W., & Fabio, R. (2003). Multiple classifier systems: 4th international workshop. Oklahoma, OK: Springer Wesley, W.C., & Tsau Y.L. (2005). Foundations and advances in data mining. Oklahoma, OK: Springer Read More