The occurrence of a zombie invasion can result in various foreign policy implications given that the incident would warrant extreme rebuttal from governments. Drezner intends to enlighten the governments to prepare to include zombies by looking at various international relation principals and theories. He establishes that it can be a very intrinsic affair trying to amass zombies with humanity based on the belief that they crave for the flesh of humans (Drezner, 2011). Accordingly, such an attack can solicit various forms of diplomatic coercion as a norm practiced by governments globally.
Analysis of Different IR Theories Presented and Best Policy Response Zombie Attack
International relations takes different forms of theoretical approaches. For instance, realism argues that countries are autonomous due to their sovereignty, and no parallel societies can exist to mediate relations between them, not unless the move is forceful. On this, Drezner (2011) suggests that realism can favor a zombie universe. Further, he argues that the failure of humans collaborate and the futility of international cooperation can lead to zombies forming agreements with other countries. It is important to envision the assumptions of realists by looking at the principal goal of every State, a foreign invasion with the intent of occupancy is technically impossible. In view of realism, every State is required to meet certain international obligations and amongst them pivots around self-defense. Given that States can formulate international laws to institute their existence, chances are less for zombies to negotiate for a place of survival.