Please boost your Plan to download papers
Michael Sandel's critique of John Rawls' Theory of Justice - Essay Example
Author : beattydarrion
Pages 12 (3012 words)
This research aims to evaluate and present Michael Sandel's critique of John Rawls' Theory of Justice. Sandel’s thoughts on Liberalism and the Limits of Justice are the most comprehensive and extensive critique of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice. …
The paper tells that John Rawls has an exposition of Justice as Fairness. He believes that justice should be the primary virtue of social institutions and any false theory must be rejected or revised however classic or economical it might be. The same applies to unjust laws and institutions which Rawls believes should be reformed or abolished however adept or well-organized they might be. A good society should therefore be based on principles of justice. Rawls assumes that, “a society is a more or less-sufficient association of persons who in their relations to one another recognize certain rules of conduct as binding and who for the most part act in accordance with them”. Despite societies being cooperative ventures for mutual advantage, they are usually characterized by conflict and a status of interests. The status of interests is present because societies make it a possibility for people to have better lives than they would have if every person was to live only by his own efforts. Sandel argues that the primacy of justice is problematic since justice is not just a single important value among other values that is to be measured and examined according to requirements of convenience. He states that, “it is rather the means by which values are weighed and assessed, the value of values is not subject itself to the same kind of trade-offs as the values it regulates”. Justice as a standard reconciles conflicting values and accommodates competing conceptions of good when unresolved. ...
Not exactly what