You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Labor Relation: antinepotism policy case study
Logic & Programming
Pages 3 (753 words)
Running head: LABOR RELATIONS Labor Relations: Anti-Nepotism Case Study [Author’s Name] [Tutor’s Name] [Class] 16 July 2011 Abstract Nepotism is a complex issue. Organizations create anti-nepotism policies to promote equity in the workplace. This case study analyzes the issue of anti-nepotism policy in a Company.
Organizations want to promote equity in the workplace. This is why they develop and implement anti-nepotism policies. Nepotism can be defined as “the bestowal of patronage by reason of relationship regardless of merit” (Jones et al, 2008, p.18). In simple words, nepotism means hiring and promoting friends, relatives, or family members, when these practices lead to unfairness and discrimination against other job applicants and workers. The issue with Keith W. Walton is clear: he was fired once the company was reported that his uncle was working for the same company. Walton was fired for violating the company’s anti-nepotism policy. The main issue is whether at all Walton violated the policy of nepotism in the workplace and whether the grievant has the right to work in the company. The union is confident that the Company’s policy of anti-nepotism is misbalanced and ill defined. Although the company has the right to create such policies, Company employees have little knowledge of nepotism, its meaning, and its potential effects on the organization. The Union claims that the Company never tried to clarify the meaning of the “Employee of Relatives” section of the handbook for its employees. Moreover, the grievant might have been unaware of the fact that his Uncle worked for the same company when he applied for a job. ...
Not exactly what you need?