The question of whether or not Microsoft represents a monopoly has long since been settled. With fully 90% of all computers running Microsoft operating systems, the reality of the current market speaks for itself…
As will be demonstrated in this brief analytical response, it is the belief of this author that an monopoly, regardless of its shape, size, or form, is ultimately destructive to the market and harmful to the end consumer (Kapoor, 2009). As such, the case of Microsoft and a discussion of economic theory, as well as the behavior that Microsoft has indicated over the past several decades, will be engaged as a means of understanding this particular approach. Furthermore, it is the hope of this author that the reader will come to a more profound level of understanding with respect to the fact that monopolies are ultimately harmful and do not represent a net benefit to the society as a whole (figures 1 and 2 within the appendix of this brief work demonstrate the harm that a monopoly can have with regards to increased prices paid by the end consumer). Monopoly and Microsoft: In understanding the monopoly that Windows has on the user experience of operating a PC, one should not only look to the way in which the firm dominates the operating system itself. Instead, a quick consideration of recent history reveals that Microsoft has long cultivated the monopoly that it now holds (Ohlhausen, 2004). For instance, Microsoft purposefully packaged Internet Explorer within Windows 95 and after as a means of decreasing the market presence and overall level of profitability that Netscape could have in the market (Gisser, 2011). As this was an effective tool towards decreasing competition, and Microsoft soon learned the benefit of packaged software’s ability to further define the market that it had already captured, much the same technique was employed with regards to the audio/video player of Windows Media Player (Vogelstein, 2004). Realizing the a litany of different startups were threatening to take market share from Microsoft, the same strategy of packaging Windows Media Player into the operating system as a means of integrating the product with what can only be described as a captive market (Greene et al. ,2004). As can be firmly noted, the monopolistic model of competition is ultimately harmful to the market and to the consumer. The only entity that benefits from such a model is obviously the producer. As figure 1 and figure 2 both denote, a certain level of deadweight loss is portended by the monopoly. As a graphical representation helps the reader to understand, this deadweight loss is actually stolen from the equilibrium price and demand; thereby making the good under monopolistic competition greatly higher priced than it would be in normal competition. As previously denoted, this in and of itself is engaged by the monopoly seller as a means of incurring further profits. Figure 1: Figure 2: Microsoft’s Approach to Profitability and the Engagement of the Monopoly as a Function of Capitalist Drive Likewise, in seeking to understand the approach that Microsoft has engaged, it can only be defined as one that is bounded by rational self interest in the sense of continuing to accrue further levels of profitability and continue to integrate into further markets (Cohen et al., 1999). Even a cursory review into the current time does not reveal a Microsoft that allows its fate to be pinned upon the success or failure of an operating system; rather, when one looks at the face of Microsoft, one can see a firm that has recently expanded to purchase a controlling ...
Cite this document
(“Monopoly and Microsoft Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/macro-microeconomics/105777-windows-owned-by-microsoft-is-the-operating-system
(Monopoly and Microsoft Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Monopoly and Microsoft Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/macro-microeconomics/105777-windows-owned-by-microsoft-is-the-operating-system.
The company has been accused of pursuing anti competition strategies that are unlawful in order to dominate the market and benefit from the monopoly power (Meller 2009). In a monopoly, the firm will have the entire control in setting prices and sometimes derails innovation due to lack of competition.
Name: Course Name: Course Instructor: Date of Submission: Microsoft monopoly-Why was Microsoft investigated for antitrust behavior? Microsoft Company is one of the biggest companies in the world. It is also termed to be a computer software industry that is diversified.
The main objectives of the following research are to observe the strategical marketing plan of business success, product, and pricing & promotional scenario, steps taken by the company to competitor prevention, reasons for being called as Monopoly, facts vs false paradigm behind Microsoft as Monopoly.
Computer and software industry is the leader in bringing about such changes. Microsoft is one such company, which has made a mark in this industry to the extent that the company has established a monopoly kind of lead in many segments.
Monopoly as such is defined as a situation when a company or group holds majority stake for a product or service in one or more markets.
In such a case it might have been quite difficult for other firms to devise substitutes in any reasonable amount of time.
The new world of the web, of global capital, of footloose businesses and of rapid technical change is teeming with opportunity. It is also making the old political ideas look rather dated.
Monopoly can be considered as one of the goals of a company due to the fact that it can be equated to control in the market.
There are different prerequisites that can determine monopoly in a particular market. One is the
Therefore, a sole provider of petroleum cannot be considered a pure monopoly as natural gas is a close substitute for heating or electricity purposes. Thirdly, due to some strong reason there must be barriers to
The paper discusses the negative and positive aspects of Microsoft’s monopoly.
There are strong barriers to entry to the market. In a monopoly market, the seller sets enjoys maximum market share. More the
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Monopoly and Microsoft for FREE!