Industrial Revolution and Unemployment in UK - Essay Example

Industrial Revolution and Unemployment in UK Introduction Industrial revolution was dependent on the ideologies of scientists in developed societies. During that period, the UK society embraced the radical revolutionary dynamics in the global society while focusing on technological advancements, and its essence in the assurance of positive acquisition of success in advancements. Certainly, the revolution implicated increased per capita in the society, but the problem was that the rate of unemployment increased and the semiskilled laborers were rendered inefficient thus they lose their employment positions (Wilson 142). However, the rate of unemployment challenged all individuals in the UK society since the revolution presented a definite boundary between the employers and employees. Ideally, United Kingdom was the first economy that witnessed fast revolutionary changes during the industrial edge, and the people witnessed inequities in securing employment positions. Further, the differences between the society emerged in accordance to social classes, genders, and the levels of literacy challenged the society adversely. For example, an historical factory worker named Edward Carpenter from Wales who previously served as a weaver lost his employment in the height industrial revolution. Since Richard Arkwright’s introduction of the Spinning Jenny, Edward secured an employment position as a factory superintendent in the late 19th century involved himself in a series of deeds that led to his death, and the death of a female factory worker. The following discussion evaluates the various existing arguments on the effects of the industrial revolution with an outline of the subsequent impacts that it presented to the society. Lastly, the discussion shall also involve Edward Carpenter social life and economic progress in the United Kingdom’s society during the industrial revolution period (Garside 68). An argumentative discussion on Edward Carpenter’s issues during the industrial revolution period Arguably, the industrial revolution influenced the English society to embark on various social and economic changes during the period. Edward was a weaver and having lived during the period, he worked at the Edmund Cartwright Looming Company to carry out managerial duties (Hill 241). However, the predominant aspect in Edward’s life is that the weaving community reigned over the UK’s clothing groups thus; he was able to secure a senior position in the looming firm despite the norm that the young generation was overly accepted as the most efficient workers in the factories thus rendering most of the mature population unacceptable in the society. Similarly, industrial revolution seemed the most influential factor to social divisions as the society recurred to the use of employer and employee title depending on the position that one held in the labor industry (Wilson 146). Differences in the UK society highlighted that the industrial race introduced many of the technological advancements that led to the loss of tenure for the self-employed individuals since a task that was previously undertaken by a broad number of individuals in the society transformed abruptly to require a few workers and the use of machines to produce a worthwhile output. Therefore, such changes transformed the economical perspective of Edward. Preferably, he turned out to be an employee who had limited time for other activities while his former weaving profession enabled him to address family, and other social issues (Tosh 75). Edward Carpenter’s undocumented history impounds the anti-social practices that existed during the time (Wilson 148). Child labor was prevalent, but it was poorly addressed during the industrial edge. The struggling character’s practices posed poor approaches to production, and delivery of the looms since he lacked factory-working skills, which differed broadly with his former weaving skills. Mainly, the use of machinery rendered hand weaving a useless tenure since the invented looms led to the efficient production of fabrics thus the customer population deviated from the use of handmade to the factory made fabrics (Tosh 79). The industrial revolution period changed the peasantry and agricultural society thus; farmers deviated from the norm of undertaking agricultural activities since the entire society was aiming for factory workmanships (Hill 249). The issue influenced Edward since he did not expect to compete for employment with peasants in the organization. Arguably, Edward Carpenter while still in the factory suffered from unemployment since his earnings did not equate to those he earned as a self-employed weaver. Therefore, the impacts of industrial revolution served to the best of the society while as an individual, Edward suffered from the rate of reduced income (Garside 168). However, Edward suffered as a factory worker since the industries undertook production of materials for profit reasons and was less concerned with the welfare of the labor force (Mullard 56). At a certain point, Edward Carpenter led a group of the unemployed factory workers to the Trafalgar square in London to induce the government into the documentation of their needs over those of their employers. The resultant of the demonstrations was the murder of one of the unemployed people. Historically, the society named this day the bloody Sunday. Arguably, Edward realized that some of the superiors enjoyed more benefits, and hardly accepted the accusations from the workers. Intentionally, Edward’s employment served negatively due to the health challenges that he met in the industrial job performances as the machine weaving comprised exonerated them to different dangerous situations. These difficulties further challenged Edward’s social life since he was unable to coordinate his work while still upholding family values. The cause and effect relationships in Edward Carpenter’s life during the revolution period Extensive revelations adapted from history show that Mr. Carpenter perceived oppression through unemployment as the tenure was uneven and short-lived since the employer ran the textile production in seasons. Further, Edward stirred demonstrations in the industry to achieve equated salary and wage schemes for all the employees. It is evident that the period included bias and prejudice since the aggressive relations between Edward and his superiors emanated from the unequal treatment of workers. Since United Kingdom was under social activist’s oppression seeking to accrue equated benefits for the citizens despite their demographic variations (Hill 251). The issue of being a poor and unskilled citizen in the nation was to be eased gradually since the variations depended mainly on the people’s former professions prior to the industrial revolution. Edward perceived that the rate of oppression translated to slavery. In such a case, Ethical theories were significant in changing the economic environment of all businesses (Wilson 149). The essence is that the study manipulated and established various principles as the ideal for conducting changes in the society. Edward relied on his position in the firm to progress in learning the effective nature of industrialization and ideological perspectives of weaving using machinery. The interrelations amongst the company’s employees improved during the Edward’s tenure since he managed to coerce most of the factory employees against the murder of their colleagues. However, the organization’s stakeholders found it hard to incriminate Edward successfully as the political structure favored the rights of the unemployed (Tosh 114). Immensely, the men were superior over their female whites thus; Edward was secure from any forms of threats since the political structure seemed to hold to the superiority of the white races. Researchers observe that the benefits of industrial revolution served the superior groups of the population while others suffered as subjects to oppression and poor wages with the prevalence of social inequities (Mullard 76). Other observations are that the trend of prejudice in the organization in accordance to the level of skills and performances challenged Edward towards the aggressive demonstrations against the inequities. During the industrial revolution period, Carpenter fell under the circumstances injustices since the powerful majority of the industrial superiors constrained the achievement of better changes in relation to the minorities’ welfare (Garside 176). Edward relied on his position and economic prowess for he had a better lifestyle, wealthy upbringing, and a profound weaving background compared to all his colleagues in the factory. The character was surrounded by different circumstances; for instance, he distrusted the superior personnel and did not allow them to influence his decisions in the organization. It is evident that economic development during the revolutionary period favored some classes of people in the UK society, and further established chronological differences on the facts that reflected the ancient to the present practices of citizens in the society (Tosh 145). He depended on radical industrial revolution for enhanced standards of living. For example, the social developments witnessed during that period suited the male individuals of the white races and oppressed all individuals from the inferior races, and the female gender. Analytical reviews show that Edward’s social life and relationships were based upon the revolution of social interrelations that prevailed during 1740 to the early 20th century. The industrial advancements favored the will of the white superiors who despite the doubling of the wages of the employees relied formidably on the existing antisocial practices to ensure that the inferior groups of the society. Therefore, the existence of Edward Carpenter during the period indicates the impacts that the revolutionary changes expressed to the broader society. Dawning of the industrial age, the western economies advocated for different policies to shape their citizens towards adaptation of the desired culture and the value of civilization (Mullard 156). The practices varied accordingly from UK to other European economies. The countries encouraged different languages, arts, and religions among their citizens. The influential factors that affected Edward’s social welfare Prior to the beginning of the 20th century, the character was included in a series of industrial activities that led to the establishment of the payroll systems to various groups of the society who had been facing high levels of unemployment. For example, Edward allied himself to other workers together they formed a diverse group, which further comprised of the inferior gender. He embarked on worthwhile establishments of regulations to address the different interests of the group from different perspectives, and hindered any form of practices that would favor injustice afterwards. His immediate employer anticipated that the constitution was the only form of security by providing equity to the matter, and embarked on profound demonstrations such that the political hindrances would bar his intentions (Amman and Leigh 665). The advent of these rivalries was the indulgence in mechanization and the spread of technology in the development of the UK society with some groups of people benefiting while others were losing accordingly. There were high rates of unemployment to the inferior races and gender in the highly ranked job positions. Therefore, Edward and his colleagues differed in social status, and the level of skills thus; he was certain of his success over the others with an assurance that he would remain superior since the society identified different education programs for different races. Arguably, this is one of the reasons as to why most of the discoveries were made by people from the superior races during the period of the industrial revolution. The different practices led to the implementation of different forms of leadership styles and employment practices (Wilson 256). The workers rivaled against each other in severe demonstrations that led to severe psychological traumas amongst the participants and the entire population. The first world depicted significance in the industrial revolution changes of social, political, and economic structures. The industrial revolution changes further defined new approaches to work in the European society. It followed the anticipations that rivalry symbolized danger to the industrialization edge thus; the society embarked on practicing different approaches to social and economic variable. For instance, the UK politicians approached the majorly affected groups in different industries for the guarantee of social security, and the provision of equating benefits (Chabanet and Jean 650). The industrial revolution period prompted to the social advancement of UK in the 20th century, and Edward belonged to the weaving community that benefited tremendously from the outcomes of the implemented firms. Conclusion These inequities and practices fuelled the beginning of unending demonstrations from factory workers who eyed on the implementation of equated constitution for the welfare of the UK workers despite their social positions. The demonstrations led to the democratization of employment rights as other employees in different nations derived a new approach to labor, and thereby included women in their demonstrations to gain access to the workforce. The advent of civilization and equated justice through society’s cohesion and integration in UK served as a propellant towards job allocation in accordance with the levels of skills and competencies that different individuals showed (Garside 241). The edge was subject to competition on common interests in the job markets since there were new forms of industrialization. During the beginning of the First World War, women in UK merged to form organizations that fought for their rights. Work cited Amman, Hans M, and Leigh Tesfatsion. Handbook of Computational Economics: 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006. Print. Chabanet, Didier, and Jean Faniel. The Mobilization of the Unemployed in Europe: From Acquiescence to Protest?New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Internet resource. Garside, William R. British Unemployment, 1919 - 1939: A Study in Public Policy. Cambridge [u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002. Print. Hill, Berkeley. An Introduction to Economics: Concepts for Students of Agriculture and the Rural Sector. Wallingford: CABI, 2006. Print. Mullard, Maurice. The Politics of Recession. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub, 2012. Internet resource. Tosh, John. A Man's Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 2009. Print. Wilson, Elizabeth. Adorned in Dreams: Fashion and Modernity. London: Tauris, 2003. Print. Read More