Making Globalization to Bring Prosperity - Essay Example

Making Globalization something that brings prosperity to everyone. This paper critically evaluates how globalization can bringtransformation hence prosperity using Transformationlist, theoretical perspective. First, the paper summarizes the Transformationslist theoretical perspective and its assertions on globalization. Second, the paper discusses globalization while linking it to the theoretical perspective used. In this section, the paper describes the positive and negative effects of globalization. In particular, it examines the effect of globalization on America. America is the focus since nations such as it is a powerful nation with a well-developed in the region. Finally, the paper concludes with an overview of the aforementioned issues, in particular, the results of the critical evaluation based on the featured theoretical perspective while highlighting the positive impacts of on overall globalization. Keywords, Tranformationalist, Globalization, Satellite, and age, Global Village, Global politics, Global economy and Culture Tansformatiomationlist Theoretical Perspective on Globalization The transformationalist theoretical perspective offers a deep insight into the globalization debates. In its view, globalization is something that is occurring and is changing the face of modern societies, however while the change is occurring many aspects remain the same (Mozaffari 34). Transformationalists still see nation states as retaining much power to steer their own course in the global economy. For instance, while the global capitalist system cuts across most parts of the globe; many nations retain the power to determine their own taxation and economic policies. On the political platform, rather than being consumed by a system of global governance where sovereignty and power are eroded by global institution, transformationlists suggests that governments are compelled to adapt an active and outward stance towards governance within the complex conditions of globalization (Heywood 45). This view suggests that nations have to adapt and interact with new Institutions, social movements, and international bodies on a global level and rather than lose power many nations are adapting to this process. On a cultural level, transformationlist see a two-way dynamic happening where global migration telecommunication and mass media are contributing to the diffusion of cultural influences (Giddens 50). From this perspective, whilst the western cultural aspects penetrate many regions across the globe as depicted in Coke and McDonalds, there are counter flows of non-western cultural aspects, which is evidenced by the increasing number of foreign restaurants in major cities and towns across the globe. This scenario is seen in the satellite and age where the spread of information on an intercultural basis is rapidly taking shape. Ideally, the world is experiencing a cultural exchange in a two-way traffic. Critical Analysis Suddenly, the world appears to have turned into a small place as people can connect and learn of information and events happening in distant places. The optimistic term “a global village,” coined in the early 1990 refers to the world, becoming, more integrated and hence resembling a village, where people have constant interactions and often depend on one another for survival. Globalization is a product, which has been made possible through the introduction of some important technological innovations including the . The appearance of undoubtedly contributed much to globalization. Today, the affects Globalization in many aspects. Ideally, it imparts the three dimensions of Globalization cultural, economic, and political (Modelski 32). In many respects, affects globalization. Some of the components are cultural and business aspects connecting many people across the globe and the governance of the . globalization relates closely to Transformationslist theoretical perspective on globalization. Globalization relies on the profound transformation change and the major driving force reshaping the face of the earth. There are no clear distinctions between domestic and the international in terms of the social economic and political processes. For example, aspects of the national cultural aspects such as religion, media, film fashion, food and music are so infused with inputs from the international arena such that the national culture are difficult to identify (Held 45). However, each of these globalization components has its own pros and cons. First, release of into the commercial market, sparked the irrevocable process of bringing individuals, organization, and nations into increased close contact and the formation of online networks, and becomes inevitable. America is a region leading in its innovative technologies. In particular, America has emerged as an influential global partner credit to the technologies. America ranks first among countries offering high-speed connection. Online social interactions have transformed personal relation. People connect with and share information to people in distant places. It appears that there are no boundaries. Although it appears is pulling towards a common standard, many American states still uphold their own unique tax and economic policies. Besides, has led to the modernization and improvements in the business world, especially to the American states. In this region, businesses have improved on their global competitiveness and have become more productive with much more efficient transactions and quick access to information. With the , markets have become competitive with consumers providing consumers with numerous choices (Xu 34). Still on the American front communication have increased tremendously where many people are connecting to other parts thus helping to promote social economic, cultural, and political, aspects of every nation. The positive impact of conforms to the Transformationlist theoretical perspective. As there are positive impacts of the , there are some negative impacts of , as well. First, while ’s advancements have increased in some regions of the world, majority of the nations are less developed and have limited access to the . In this respect, political control of the implies that the ruling authority censors and bans the access to certain WebPages. There is no universal access to the . Therefore, it disadvantages businesses and people in developing countries who are unable to utilize the global potential. Based on the unregulated, decentralized, and open nature, the has served an anarchic tool, which poses great risks to governments (Wooldridge 42). In particular, it has influenced countries politics since it explicitly propagates while implicitly spreading western democratic values (Gazleh 25). Such negative views are normally spread through government sponsored and governmental organization groups in the west. Besides, has received criticisms on addictions to social networking sites and as well as x-rated content, cultural assault and copyrights infringement. Conclusion In conclusion, based on the transformationlist theoretical perspective, the contemporary world is now, more globalized than before. The transformationlists see this as a unique opportunity for adaption and cooperation for nations and an increasing cultural interaction from all sides. With proper use and guidance on the , world is set to transform into a more globalised place; a world of positive cultural interactions, competitive business, and quality. Besides, increased communication is set to promote social economic and political interactions. In particular, the is causing a two-way dynamic happening where global migration telecommunication and mass media are contributing to the diffusion of cultural influences. This scenario is seen in the satellite and age where the spread of information on an intercultural basis is rapidly taking shape. Ideally, the world is experiencing a cultural exchange in a two-way traffic On the political .platform, rather than being consumed by a system of global governance where sovereignty and power are eroded by global institution, the is causing governments to adapt an active and outward stance towards governance within the complex conditions of globalization. In overall, the seems to be transforming the world, this correlates to the view held by the Transformationlist that globalization is something that is occurring and is changing the face of modern societies. Work Cited Gazleh, Mose. Globalization and Politics: The effect of Globalization on Human Life Aspects, Retrieved on November 30 2013 from http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/110500/globalization-and-politics-the-effects-of-globalization-on-human-life Giddens, Armstrong. Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009. Print. Held, Det. Global Transformations, Politics, Economics and Culture, Cambridge: Polity Press, Print. 2000. Heywood, Alforce. Politics. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave and Macmillan, 2009. Print. Lenin, Violet. Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism, London: Pluto Press, 1996. Print. Modelski, Grace. The Global Transformations Reader, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2003. Print. Mozaffari, Mark. The transformationalist perspective and the rise of a global standard of civilization, International Relations of the America pacific: 2001; 1(2): 247-264 Wooldridge, Micklethwait. A Future Perfect: The Challenges and Hidden Promise of Globalization. London: William Haniman, Print. 2000. Xu, Justus. Public Attitudes toward Globalization in East America: Findings from a Cross-National Survey, Journal of Intercultural communication, 2013; 32 Read More