It has to be the same what it is, “Asia Unravels: Could this be the sequel to the fall of the Berlin Wall? (Economic Crisis)”, it should clearly focus the Berlin wall and the reasons around it neither discussing the economic growth in past years around the globe. The essay really needs to focus and expand the essay with the concerns of Berlin Wall.From the article and its observatory contents, it seems that the author is not an economist rather a critic writer and has a deep observed the economic growth of the world through different frequent studies done for the article. It can know with the statements like, “many observers believe South Korea's new president, Kim Dae Jung, will succeed in mobilizing the public, the business community, and the labor unions to transform the old system there.’ Or, “Japanese families, in turn, are forced to live in tiny houses, commute long distances to work on standing-room-only railways, and forgo consumption on a startling amount of their income.” Though, the author is matured enough to write a lot about the economy throughout the globe from past years. As towards, its contents for words and their texture along with the grammar, the content is peer – revised not focusing on the word document format i.e., taking care of spaces after commas wherever used. Moreover, the peer revision is definite as it’s an article by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research and though can’t be copied.
This article, “Asia Unravels: Could this be the sequel to the fall of the Berlin Wall? (Economic Crisis)” uncovers the secrets of economic crises around the globe but also conveys the alert for the second fall of Berlin Wall with reasons…