Killer Bureaucracies - Essay Example

Bureaucracies I agree with this article that services in many organizations in the modern world have been rendered impossible by bureaucracies. This fact is reiterated by DuBrin who posits that "Requiring several layers of approval to make a decision causes the process to take a long time" (266). The writer gives an example of Ebola whereby its rampant spread has been contributed by the international community to respond in a timely manner. In a bureaucratic system, major decisions are made by senior officials in the government rather than being made by public representatives.

Henninger in the article explicates that people have wrongly accused poor response to problematic issues to insufficient funding (para. 7). However, this is not the case. In fact, more funding only creates the need for additional accountability and therefore more layers are created in the system to deal with accountability issues. In my opinion, lower level representatives in the government as well as elected officials ought to be allowed to make independent decisions in terms of emergencies.

In doing so, problematic cases such as the Ebola outbreak can be responded to on a timely manner and hence curbing the situation. I also agree with the postulation from the article that introducing more rules and regulations, as is in the case with introducing additional funds, will amplify human errors hence increasing inefficiency (para. 12). In my opinion, inefficiency is contributed by the introduction of more funding that translates to more rules and regulations to account for the funds.

Consequently, this contributes to the amplification of human errors as it will also involve handling more people. Works citedDuBrin, Andrew. Essentials of Management. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2011. Print. Henninger, Daniel. "Killer Bureaucracies." CNN. 2 Oct. 2014. Web. 12 Oct. 2014.