This essay will attempt to briefly analyze each of the Four Perspective of Organisational Change, weigh them, classify them as to their specific strengths and weaknesses, provide the reader with an understanding of which of the Four Perspectives of Organisational Change is most aptly suited for use by management currently…
Firstly, the structural/functional perspective grew from the age of industrialism. This was a time of modernism where defined inputs equalled to defined outputs. The total was the sum of the parts. Cause was based on effect; measurement was a rigid and mathematical science that was believed could properly define every level of an organisation. During this period of modernism, the ideas of people such as Henry Ford and others helped to further regiment the organisation and labour processes that helped to define them. As Grieves states, “(Functionalism) was able to look at an organisation as a control mechanism: that is to say, to understand the important structural components and to articulate the functional interrelationships between he parts...because it is a model for controlling operations, this model is therefore mechanistic. It tends to ignore the motivations, behaviours, attitudes, and values that contribute to effective performance” (Grieves, 2010). As such, this approach, born out of rationalism, defined the unit as a sum of its component parts. This extremely scientific and methodical approach tended to miss the mark with regards to who and what actually made up the backbone of an organisation. Such thinking is doubtless one of the causal factors that made institutions such as the League of Nations such short-lived experiments.
Doubtless, there is a distinct need for exactness and measurability when analyzing the inner workings of industry. ...
It tends to ignore the motivations, behaviours, attitudes, and values that contribute to effective performance” (Grieves, 2010). As such, this approach, born out of rationalism, defined the unit as a sum of its component parts. This extremely scientific and methodical approach tended to miss the mark with regards to who and what actually made up the backbone of an organisation. Such thinking is doubtless one of the causal factors that made institutions such as the League of Nations such short-lived experiments. Doubtless, there is a distinct need for exactness and measurability when analyzing the inner workings of industry. This is not to say that there is no place for such regimentation and cold precision; however, this type of analysis is dangerous in that it does not take into account the human factor at any level whatsoever. At its core, any organisation, any unit, any work group is comprised of people; as such, it only stands to reason that by completely ignoring the effects that the individual will have on any process or change dynamic, one is in danger of oversimplifying the organisation as a sum of its mechanistic parts (Kotter, 2012). As such, sole use of the functional/structural perspective will likely lead to an oversimplification of the organisation and will result in faulty and/or incomplete information being relayed back to the management. Indeed, the text states the following concerning the functional/structural perspective: “Structural theory assumes that organisations are amenable to change – because organisations are rational and should seek to better themselves and achieve their objectives” (Grieves, 2010). Due to the very nature of change, the known effects of culture, the very real threat of resistance to change within an organisation, ...
Cite this document
(“Perspectives on Organisational Change Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/management/11378-perspectives-on-organisational-change
(Perspectives on Organisational Change Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
“Perspectives on Organisational Change Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/management/11378-perspectives-on-organisational-change.
The vitally of change is evident in the adjustments made by organisations in their goals. There are several elements that contribute to this observation. External and internal changes are usually the classification maintained by organisations.
From the research it can be comprehended that the process of changes in an organisation is expected but the approval of the change management by the entire hierarchy of the organisation is appreciably a critical procedure. In order to meet the challenges of globalisation, individuals or organisations are facing rapid changes.
Organisational Change and Development Contents. Why are there different perspectives on change within organizations? Organizational change is the much discussed topic and the most important question arises is how to bring in change within the organization.
Transformational leadership is a system whereby leaders charged with governance and systems design utilise inspirational, visionary and commitment-based strategies to build subordinate confidence and motivation toward change goal attainment (Leithwood and Poplin 1992).
This study is based on the theme of management of change in organisation, taking into account the challenges that the change agents face while proceeding with the process. The objective of this study would be to utilise the 5D framework in order to evaluate the planned and unplanned challenges that can be seen in organisations, while conducting this change process.
It also allows governments the flexibility to initiate and terminate programs, as well as respond to changing needs, without start-up costs associated with such changes. One of the agencies privatised by government is a topic for discussion in current study.
In other words it's a dynamic process intended to bring about systemic improvement and change. Thus organizational culture plays a very significant role here. The process of transformation from what an organization now is to a new dimensional growth trajectory is determined by how best change is accepted by the staff.
opment along with strategy formulation and also implementation is known in the realm of human resource management as strategic human resource development. Strategic human resource development is a part of an organisation’s long term views regarding human resource policy. Also,
Change is the most inevitable requirement of an organisation as it helps to optimise the level of performance of the employees. This is because; organisational change is a sort of response to combat the challenging scenario or it may be triggered by the higher authority of the organisation to augment the image in the market.
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Perspectives on Organisational Change for FREE!