Moral Responsibility of a Leader.
The main focus of the paper is Rush Kidder’s concept of “Ethics Recession”. The world population is in a crucial state of shedding all its national identity and maturing into one global village…
Intercultural impacts and massive communication facilities are leading us towards next major evolutionary step in human history, the world citizenship. Every individual involved in this process is required to lead an interconnected group in a subtle way. Hence every citizen of the planet is required to hone their leadership abilities like never before. Their leadership quality should be governed by ethics more than personal or group oriented preferences (Schmidt, 2007). But, the way the world works show we are treading in the exact opposite direction. No one ever takes responsibility of any mishap. Rush Kidder pinpoints the lack of this major moral responsibility as “Ethics Recession”. We will discuss the reasons for the situation, its adverse affects and the means to change into better leaders in this paper.
Every moral leader is responsible not only for their actions but also the dealings they could have prevented doing for the welfare of everyone. Huge corporate companies and conglomerations which will lead this technological era should have iron willed leaders capable of choosing the best for both their company as well as the world in general. This is where ethics come is picture.
Every good leader considers all the given options and its alternatives before taking any major decision. They analyze the consequences and the emotional impacts that might affect his crew and others in general. They take firm decisions which are profitable to the company and his employees. They also take the moral responsibility for any discomfort caused by this action (Taylor, 2000). They compensate groups or people affected in the required way and convince them to co-operate in the big picture of development, putting aside their personal grievances. This is exactly how moral leaders behaved for centuries. But the question here is ‘Why is there a sudden decline in such effective leadership?’ Every problem the world faces today, from economical recession to, terrorism and infiltration are a result of this lack of moral leadership (Anello, 2006). The US housing bubble, a major reason for the recession is the best example for what lack of work ethics will do. What happened to our modern and moral citizens? Will world citizens be well dressed cannibals eating others opportunities whenever possible? If so is it development or a path to destruction? To find suitable answers to these questions we should first define “Morals” and “Ethics” The Enormous Responsibility of Leadership The word “Value” refers to something of importance. A commodity or a products value is determined based on its importance. Similarly the “Value” of a person is also determined based on his position or status. The decision taken by the ruler or the leader has more “Value” than the decision taken by a normal man. But every leader including the King was expected to follow some moral conducts known as “ethics” to maintain this “value” or their position in the ancient world. When the mob refused to follow its ethics, dictators arouse. When Kings failed to add “Value” to their decisions through non ethical conduct, the church condemned them and revolutions arouse. The higher the position is the necessity to follow the code of conduct or ethics increases. Hence most of the nobles, church dignitaries and Kings ...
Cite this document
(“Moral Responsibility of a Leader Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/management/11702-moral-responsibility-of-a-leader
(Moral Responsibility of a Leader Research Paper)
“Moral Responsibility of a Leader Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/management/11702-moral-responsibility-of-a-leader.
The research describes the role of Collectivism in Chinese Management and develops the proposition that Collectivism leads to a strong perception of Chinese management. By describing the role of Moral Judgment the paper also develops the proposition that Confucianism and collectivism are positively related to Chinese management’s moral judgment.
But if scholars assessed him a failure president, US veterans regarded him a great military leader. Why was Grant perceived differently as a leader? How Grant’s leadership should be assessed? How Grant as a leader would fair in the five practices of exemplary leadership framework?
Unlike deposed Tunisian president Zine el Abidine Ben Ali (ruler since 1987) and former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak (ruler since 1981), Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has defiantly remained entrenched in his position four months after the revolt began (Burns, 2011).
Leadership is the process of influencing people socially where one individual enlists the help of other people under them in the achievement of certain goals and objectives. It is also the mobilization of people in an organized manner in order to accomplish a certain task.
2. The U.S. record on women’s rights is among world’s best. 3. The U.S. Constitution, the country’s moral compass and basis of law, serves as the model for many other nations’ constitutions. 4. The U.S. has a large military budget, in part, to provide security for other nations and to act as a deterrent to aggressor nations.
Despite Oprah Winfrey not being on TV screens daily following the end of her talk show in 2011, she remains among the world’s headlining billionaires. With the much interest elicited among scholars on charismatic and transformational leadership theories with regard to organizational research, Oprah offers an appropriate illustration for this article.
Various soldiers have risen up the ranks from adhering to the values. Their hard work in their training and value system has yielded fruits in battle field, bringing victory to nation. This paper will talk about General Henry Harley Arnold who was a General of the Army, and was later made the general of the Air Force.
He discusses morality on the basis of voluntary and involuntary actions. He also believes that virtues are of two kinds, intellectual and moral virtue. Apart from involuntary and voluntary criteria, there is another criterion that Aristotle