Exploring how Japanese managers adapt in the United States - Essay Example

? Exploring how Japanese managers adapt in the United s Leeds Metropolitan Faculty of Business and Law Cross Cultural Management Student Name: Mohamed Elamin Student ID: 33272678 4th April 1, 2012 Introduction When we talk about culture, we talk about mostly our up bringing, where each one of us has grown and become accustomed to their surroundings. Each one of us is shaped into the way he/she is by an exceptional blend of experience and inheritance. Natives in a similar community or environment contribute to many practices and erudite patterns of behavior which become so well-known that they may be oblivious that other groups have totally dissimilar systems (Trompenaars & Hampden- Turner 1998). Culture in most cases is thought of and is composed of the producers of civilization, for instance, dance, music, foods, literature, architecture, festivals, clothes and art. These are the features of culture, which can be exposed through the senses and are clear sources of deliberations, delight and contrast (Adler 1997). When working on terms that are of international work, it is the concealed aspects of cultural dissimilarities that have the most impact on every day relations with members of the local community, with staff, managers, or colleagues. There are a number of things that are learned from childhood and reinforced through adapted through experience. An instance is the ways of problem solving, relationships building, conversing, requests making. By watching our parent, siblings, and peers in short our close relations as they interrelate, we are not only setting up prototypes of behavior but sets of beliefs and values (Dawling et al. 2008). Groups that are in places of work set up their own set of rules, which are dictated by roles, academic field, and status and funding tasks. Policies of behavior become so well instituted and internalized that we may never be aware that our own culture is not universal. According (Hofstede 1992) these erudite rules, beliefs and values turn into the software of the mind or else the filter through which we understand events surrounding us. Considering that we live in a small world after all, in today’s business relations, international markets are becoming the focus of majority of the companies. This in turn makes the organizations to send their local professionals to foreign countries. This however happens most of the time. In order to survive in a foreign country, one of the things that will make it easy for you is to understand the culture of your host country. This enables smooth and effective communication. In understanding the culture of that given country, the most important thing that the Japanese learn is in particular what each society and what they display mean. Cultural adaptations should be on the key front when these manager of organizations decide that they are to send their employees to work in a foreign country (Hoecklin 1995). By implementing a moderate level of cultural adaptation in main settings, professionals create more effectual business relationships, in that way furthering tactical corporate goals. Globalization generates new business opportunities for multinational corporations (MNCs) These MNCs increasingly employ expatriation approaches to make their entrance in to markets that are new easy and to administer their coworkers. As much as the responsibility of the worker who is sent to a foreign country is very important, the strategy in which they adapt in is surrounded with a lot of danger. Additionally, the emigre also posses multiple risks for instance if their result outcome is low, this leads to major financial hitches to the organization. (Hodgetts 2005). Many expletory studies of how Japanese emigres become accustomed to working in the United States after a while have been conducted at length. The final results recommend that the managers of Japanese origin adapt ways that are way above their normal concrete and vigor in their stay in the United States. It is also to be noted that the bigger the group of emigres, the more the understanding of the language and adaption to the environment becomes more slow. In addition to that, unlike their counterparts the managers who are from the US, it is also noted that depending on the demands of the culture in which they live in, their ways of learning are in correspondent to that. According to mead and Andrews, it is to be observed that in adapting to the culture of the country that hosted them, these managers from Japan don’t directly copy and adapt in to the culture of their host country (2008).To understand more on how emigre adapt in a foreign country, the Japanese give a very good show of how they manage in host countries. Researches that have been taken into account display the differences within the culture of the Japan and USA. An instance is how the Japanese have a culture which is high in contenxt while for the USA is the opposite. In addition to that, Hofstede notes that compared to their host country the US which is based on individualism, the culture of the Japan people appears to be collectivism(2008). These instances of inconsistencies between the foreign and the local culture possibly will give out very difficult challenges that the emigrants will not be in a position to handle. Compared to the way the USA emigrants adapt, it can be concluded that in the case of the Japanese, they find it a very hard task adapting in the USA. French approaches this in trying to make us understand the discrepancies that the difficultuies that are faced by using the Japan and the US cultures (2007). Regardless of the huge comparisons that exist between the two cultures, the Japanese have been noted for adapting quickly and effectively despite the differences that exist in their culture (Boyatzis & Kolb 1991). If these findings are anything to go with, it should be noted that in understanding the strategy that is set up in a global platform the Japanese should give a clear insight. These expatriates from Japan have been among the list of the companies that are mostly admired in the world. To elaborate this more clearly, in the list of the ten top organizations that function well in the US but are not from their, 4 Japan emigres were named and quite a lot of them made the top 50 overall (Boyatzis & Kolb 1995). Emigre’s learning manner in cross-cultural circumstances that have been examined, lead us to surmiseone of the influential forces that determine how the emigres sufficiently react to their host environment is culture (Browaeys & Price 2008). Consequently, leading to a number of questions that are based depending on the environment that the learning takes place and the changes that are experienced by the emigrant working in a foreign land. How learning techniques change the stay in a foreign state According to (Yamazaki & Kayes 2004), from the evaluation of studies taken, it is evident that a key style of learning is definite to occur in any given company that mirrors the leading environment of learning to be the culture of the host country. An instance is where the concurrent style which is based on experience that is concrete and a lot of observation appears to be the key factor in the Japanese emigrants. This is unlike their USA counterparts, who learn from experimenting and conceptualization of facts. This clearly gives out the difference that exists between the two given cultures (Brislin et al. 1973). How learning is different over time between the managers fro the host state and the expatriates The findings of studies that wanted to investigate these divergent cultures of both the US and how they manage to work and survive in a host country. According to Deresky, the Japanese emigres display a fondness in their manner of learning which is divergent, leaning from a lot of experience and experimentation which is active. This clearly implies that if a Japanese emigrant stays longer in a host country, his fondness is likely to grow from the experience he has gained more than the ones who have been there for a short time (Mead & Andrews 2009). This implies that the longer an expatriate stays in the host country; they will learn the culture of the US people through experimentation rather than being observant. This leads us to conclude that an emigre from Japan learns a lot leading them to appear as active emigrant learners (Trevino & Nelson 2010). The quick learning of the English Language gives out a positive outcome These conclusions are evident from the fact that states the result of the relationship is positive given the time the emigrant spends in the US. In addition to that, their basis of conceptualization which is abstract show that if the Japanese stay a while in the US they will give a positive outcome and utilize their method of learning which is usually from experiment which is active and experience which is concrete (Trompenaars & Woolliams 2003). Their method of learning which is concrete is usually vital for the Japanese emigrants who live in the host country. In addition to that, it also shows that their method of learning is important in becoming accustomed to their host country in order to produce performances that are effective and adapt fully to the cultures of their host country (Trompenaars 2007). According to Ratiu (1983), international managers that are successful are more likely to have a concentrated environment of learners compared to learners who appear abstracted. This simply shows that if a triumphant adaptation is to occur, then it is essential for the managers to adapt a mode of learning which is concrete. According to Yamazaki, in this manner expatriates who adapt this concrete mode of learning appear to have a more social life with their collogues and the residents of their host country (2003). This in turn indicates interpersonal respect and makes them appear to be a friend in need. The skills that are interpersonal are most of the time linked with their mode of learning. If the emigres are to adapt fully to their host country, then the requirement is that they should adapt these skills of learning. This makes us to sum up the following: The abstract conceptualization mode of adaptation is negatively connected to the duration of time in the host country-US Short foreign staying implies that the chances of thriving are limited for emigres. They do not offer emigrants enough time to study how local culture expects their managers to behave in relation to adapting the environment of their host country (Tung 1984). In order to adapt efficiently in their host country, then it is advisable that the Japanese emigre should stay at least two years so that they can acquire the needed skills unlike their counterparts who need around five more years to obtain a good basis of learning. Japanese MNCs gave their emigres around three years to show complete performance as (Tung 1984) continues to suggest. In the first two years spent in putting labor effort, the MNCs anticipate for a performance that is beneficial of Japanese emigrants at the third year or afterwards. Consequently, a general declaration that the time factor is essential in order to adapt in the host country’s culture can be shown as The active experimentation mode of adaptation is positively connected to time spent in the US. In adapting skills of decision making in the host country, Japanese emigrants are requisite to obtain them and as Kolb suggests that they should be in a position to handle the responsibilities given to them in their staying in other countries. These skills are evidently associated with their method of learning which is usually active. In addition to that if they become fluent in their way of communicating the English language they tend to display the qualities of a persuasive and an individual who is quick to reconcile with others. These gives us the suggestion that the Japanese emigres tend to be abstracted less and as time goes by for their stay in the host country, they appear as active individuals. As time goes by, these individuals become accustomed by switching off their modes to be more accommodating (Kolb & Boyatzis 1991). The adjustment of Japanese and US managers In time, both the managers from Japan and US appear to be more distinguished in terms of their concreteness level. According to Yamazaki and Kayes (2004), the method of adapting in a foreign land is essential if the concrete mode is to be activated. If the managers are to be trained to Copley and understand their divergent culture, interrelate nicely with other culture members and be in a position to see the signs of culture, then it is likely that they will develop a concrete mode. Therefore, the emigres individuals need a depth understanding of the culture in comparison to their hosts’ managers (Bolino & Feldman 2000; Schneider & Barsoux 2003). In the concreteness rank, both managers appear diverse in the way they adapt yhe culture of the foreign country The Japanese and U.S managers turn out to be more homogenous after a while in relation to being active in experimenting. This is to be expected due to the verity that both managers are acting in response to the action required by the host business culture-The US. Additionally, as (Kolb 1984) suggests, if active learning is to be developed, then company and the position it holds in the production and manufacturing is to be shown. The manager moves from the observation mode of the Japanese and tend to be active members. This clearly shows us that both managers in relation to their mode of experimenting actively, they appear to be homogenous as the emigre individuals become accustomed to the foreign culture (Black et al. 1999). How the level of assimilation and cohesiveness of the managers relate This shows a multifaceted in the way of adaptation. Evidence show that both emigres, whether in the home or host culture in the US/Japan have to fit in the first years of a new company in their transitional method. The model in which change is depicted is dissimilar in the host/home culture (Black et al. 1999). Generally, both the Japan and U.S managers modified to the difficulties they experienced. The emigres adapt in the culture by moving in the direction of being active in the culture that dominates the place. In some cases, some emigres managers display a multifaceted method of adjustment by replicating the culture which is dominant but some take the opposite direction. Kolb suggests that the adaptive flexibility show what these multifaceted movements symbolize (1984). While Yamazaki and Kayes (2004) have shown how becoming flexible in adaptation is important if the managers are to succeed in the host country. Expatriates build up many mechanisms to become accustomed the host culture instead of being dependant on a single way There have been quite a number of insinuations in how the practice should be carried out in a global business set up. It shows that the adaptation of managers in their host country involves the divergent modes of learning that exist, which we earlier point out an exclusive feature of cultural adaptation through expatriates’ learning (Argyris, 1999). Additionally, According to Balck & Mendehall, the assessment of how different expatriates survive in their host country should be solved more in a hypothetical and a methodological problem (1991). If Kolbs findings are anything to go with, he tries to show us that the majority of the emigres learn from experience and in turn their method of learning is what they are measured up with (Deller, 1997). According to results that have been accounted for, concrete experience is more likely to be a vital requirement, on the whole, for emigres’ adaptation to cross-cultural environments. Numerous findings put forward that the learning mode should be active in all the Japanese expatriates if they are to adapt in their host country. This type of learning mode appears to be more successful (Black 1999). There have been a number of suggestions associated with international behaviors of the HR. This shows that the mode of learning, the environment and the individual are very influential if a cultural match that is effective is to be experienced. In addition to that, if these Japanese expatriates are to adapt fully, then they should spend a minimum of two years in the host country. As a result, the typical posting of Japanese emigrants, which is four to five years when you add it all together, should offer expatriates with the abilities to carry out effectively the rest of the stay in a foreign country after the original adaptation period (Aycan 1997). Depending on their duration in the US, the learning patterns in Japanese emigres vary. These cultural models have been helpful in understanding the exact modes of learning in a host environment. These studies are very useful since as shown, the Japanese emigres have proved to be successful in the US (Auyeung & Sands 1996). Conclusion In conclusion, For managers to be effectual in becoming accustomed to their know-how and practices in an overseas country, it is clear that they must have fine technical knowledge in management, excellent understanding of local culture that is culture-specific knowledge in addition to high-quality cross-cultural communications abilities. even though it may be fair to presume that all emigre managers sent abroad have to necessarily be technically capable which may differ in some cases, it should be comprehended that being able to function well in one’s own culture does not automatically imply that one can do well in a different culture. This possibly will not just be due to the lack of cultural knowledge. To be efficient as a manager in one’s own culture does not usually necessitate one to question lots of the cultural suppositions behind one’s actions or to recognize the cause’s actions, whether they are technically necessary or culturally pleasing to attain good outcomes. To be able to transplant management or technical processes in a different culture, or to expand such processes from zero or from accessible local processes, would necessitate one to question many essential suppositions and to set up the fresh premises based on fine perceptive of in cooperation technical and cultural requirements. It is this final feature of technical capability, which is often tricky to identify. Though, such competence are most probably there in people who are inventive in their own culture, such as those who are capable of setting up novel processes and systems to manage with environmental changes at home and to augment organizational efficiency otherwise, such capability could also be found in people who have already a triumphant track record in cross-cultural management References Adler, N 1997. International Dimensions of Organisational Behaviour (3rd edition) London: International Thompson Press. Argyris, D. 1999. On Organizational Learning, 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Auyeung, P. & Sands, J. 1996. A Cross-Cultural Study of the Learning Style of Accounting Students. Accounting and Finance, 36: 261–74 Aycan, Z. 1997. Expatriate Adjustment as a Multifaceted Phenomenon: Individual and Organization Level Predictors, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(4): 434–56. Black, J.S. 1993.The Role of Expectations During Repatriation for Japanese Managers’. In Ferris, G.R. (ed) and Show, J.B., Kirkbride, R.S. and Rowland, K.M. (guest eds) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management: Suppl 3. International Human Resource Management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 339–58. Black, J.S. & Mendenhall, M. 1991. The U-curve Adjustment Hypothesis Revised: A Review and Theoretical Framework’, Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2): 225–47. Black, J.S., Morrison, A.J. & Gregersen, H.B. 1999. Global Explorers. New York: Routledge. Black, J. S, Gregersen, H.B., Mendenhall, M.E & Stroh, K 1999. Globalizing People Through International Assignments. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman. Black, J.S. and Mendenhall, M. 1991. The U-curve Adjustment Hypothesis Revised: A Review and Theoretical Framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2): 225–47. Bolino, M.C. & Feldman, D.C. 2000 Increasing the Skill Utilization of Expatriates, Human Resource Management, 39(4): 367–79. Boyatzis, R.E. & Kolb, D.A. 1991. Assessing Individuality in Learning: The Learning Skills Profile’, Educational Psychology, 11(3–4): 279–95. Boyatzis, R.E. & Kolb, D.A. 1995. From Learning Styles to Learning Skills: The Executive Skills Profile’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(5): 3–17. Brake T, Walker. M.D &Walker T, 1995. Doing Business Internationally: A Guide to Cross- Cultural Success, Princeton Training Press - Training Management Corporation, London: McGraw-Hill. Brislin, R., Lonner, W. and Thorndike, R. 1973.Cross-Cultural Research Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Browaeys, M J & Price, R 2008. Understanding Cross-cultural Management. Harlow, FT Prentice Hall Deresky, H 2008. International Management, Managing Across Borders and Cultures, Text and Cases. 6th edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Dowling P, Festing M, & Engle D.A, 2008 International Human Resource Management: Managing People in a Multinational London French, R. 2007. Cross Cultural Management in Work Organisations. London, CIPD. Hodgetts, R, Luthans, F & Doh, J. 2005 International Management, Culture Strategy and Behaviour 6th edition London: McGraw –Hill/ Irwin. Hoecklin, L 1995. Managing Cultural Differences: Strategies for Competitive Advantage Addison Wesley. Harlow Hofstede H.G, 2005. Culture's consequences comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, New York: McGraw-Hill Hofstede, G. and Hofstede, G.J. 2005. Cultures and Organizations Software of the Mind, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw Hill Hofstede, G 2001. Cultures Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organisations. 2ndedition. London: Sage. Mead R, & Andrews G.T 2009. International Management: Culture and Beyond, Chichester UK: John Wiley & Sons.  Ratiu, I. 1983. Thinking Internationally: A Comparison of How International Executives Learn. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(1–2): 139–50. Schneider, S.C. & Barsoux, J-L 2003. Managing Across Cultures. 2nd edition FT Prentice Hall. Harlow Trompenaars, F & Hampden- Turner, C .1998 Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business.2nd edition. London: McGraw Hill. Maidenhead Trompenaars, F 2007. Riding the Whirlwind: Connecting People and Organisations in a Culture of Innovation. London: Oxford. Trompenaars, F & Woolliams P 2003. Business across Cultures. Chichester Capstone Publishing. Tung, R.L. 1981. Selection and Training of Personnel for Overseas Assignments. Columbia Journal of World Business, 16: 68–78. Trevino K.L &Nelson, A.K 2010. Managing Business Ethics NJ: Hoboken Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Tung, R.L. 1984. Human Resources Planning in Japanese Multinationals: A Model for U.S. Firms? Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2): 139–49. Yamazaki Y & Kayes C.D 2004. Expatriate learning: exploring how Japanese managers adapt in the United States. Applied human resource management: strategic issues and experiential exercises. London: Sage Read More