According to the discussion, the city mayor and the elite council members plan to fire the chief. The person is thinking about the responsibilities aligned in the job that will be offered. The stakeholders are intensely affected of the malpractices of the current police department. People would not trust the cops because of the latter’s unethical conducts. The possibility of replacement for the current chief is truly tangible owing to his mismanagement, but the risk is on the interim or next chief who will be implementing more changes in force and sustain credence of the minority groups. The court should investigate the atrocity of the current administration, and once the court has proven the malpractices of the police department, the department needs to be renewed. The greatest challenge for the court is to order an extensive revision of the police force staffing. It has been said that discriminations arise from the chief that criticized African-Americans, women, and Hispanics; therefore, it is best implicated to hire forty percent of blacks and Hispanic surnamed-Americans and ten percent women in order to desist the race, nationality, and sex discrimination happening in the state.
The attitudes of key staffing in the police force are the optimum significant ingredients in identifying the level of entity compliance with public regulation, and the extent to this freedom is exercised in the staffing process. Environmental elements include demography, behavior of the domestic community, and the domestic government support for assertive action. The state should uphold the greater notion of the necessity for equal employment opportunity for both men and women.