(Information Resources Management) - Case Study Example

Case Analysis: Government of Alberta Canada – Enterprise Architecture Enterprise Architecture is very effective and efficient tool for planning and maintaining other organizational activities of the managers. The management experts advise that, businesses and the other departments as if Ministries of Government should implement this ER process in their system so that they can get the maximum output and the efficiency in their work. The Government of Alberta Canada is trying to implement this EA process in all the ministries so that a streamline workflow among all the departments and the ministries can be achieved.

In this way, the value maximization of these ministries is the basic purpose behind the implementation of the EA processes (Fukuyama 2). If we talk about the governance in any particular ministry or department then there is a need of achieving the efficiency in the processes. This efficiency can be achieved by implementing different technological tools and EA is at the top of list of those technological tools. If the Government or the CIO wants to make investment to increase the efficiency of the ministries then a better option is to develop the tradition of implementing the EA processes in them so that the investments can be fully utilized to achieve the greatest value.

The suggestion of investing in the implementation of the technological tools and tactics is really a valuable option for the businesses. While implementing EA process within the departments, there is a need to develop an integral process of governance, therefore EA can be effective at its maximum (Grembergen 1). Architecture governance is really needed because it helps to manage and control all the processes and the activities throughout the enterprise. Many of the researchers define different aspects of the process of governance; if the enterprise fully implements all of these governance processes then it will be more effective and efficient from investment point of view.

This may include corporate governance (which refers towards the streamline processes at the entire corporate level), technology governance (the advancement in the technological tools but according to proper resourcing) , IT governance (proper use of different software tools and databases )and architecture governance (whole ER processes). If all these governance processes are fully implemented in the EA system then it will be beneficial to get the maximum of the efficiency of the EA system. The implementation of the EA processes can achieve the maximum of its efficiency in the capital planning process of the Government.

The reason is that the EA process is implemented in all the ministries and the departments of the Government and it also contain the data and the information which may help in the capital planning and the budgeting process. If the executives utilize this information availability in a wise manner then they can plan their budgets and investments according to the requirement within different ministries (Multi Year Capital Planning 1). In this way, EA also play an important role for the capital planning and the investment control process.

Businesses and the Government can take advantage of this ER tool in their working. Reference List:Fukuyama, Francis, ‘What is Governance’, An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institution, Volume 26, Issue 3, (July 23, 2013), page 347 – 368 Grembergen, Wim, ‘IT governance and Its Mechanism’, Information System Audit and Control System Journal, Volume 1, issue 1, (September 24, 2004), page 16 – 24‘Multi Year Capital Planning’, Local Government Management Guide, Issue 2, Chapter 1, (October 12, 2011), page 4 - 8